|
|
Post by adhaynes on Jun 14, 2008 14:59:47 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Y3RP: LA MARAVILLA!!! on Jun 14, 2008 15:02:33 GMT -5
saddd
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 16, 2024 12:39:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2008 15:05:40 GMT -5
Lame. 36 years in the business, the greatest of all time, and he's still a slave to WWE, when isn't even where most of his career took place. Thanks Vince!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Jun 14, 2008 15:07:44 GMT -5
It sucks yeah, but people are forgetting he is under contract to WWE. You wouldn't see Triple H or Randy Orton showing at other shows, So its just the same thing, whilst he is still under contract.
One thing I didn't agree with is the NWA HOF thing though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jun 14, 2008 15:11:07 GMT -5
So the WWE doesn't want to let guys they have under contract promote competitors. What's the big deal?
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jun 14, 2008 15:15:34 GMT -5
So the WWE doesn't want to let guys they have under contract promote competitors. What's the big deal? Um... I wouldn't call the NWA a competitor with the WWE in this day and age... or any independent promotion for that matter -_- |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Jun 14, 2008 15:20:49 GMT -5
So the WWE doesn't want to let guys they have under contract promote competitors. What's the big deal? Um... I wouldn't call the NWA a competitor with the WWE in this day and age... or any independent promotion for that matter -_- Doesn't matter. People will come out just because it's a WWE star on the bill. Why should the WWE allow it's stars to promote other feds? The WWE makes no money off of it (other than possibly an appearance fee). They get none of the gate. Why should some other fed benefit from a star the WWE made? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 16, 2024 12:39:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 14, 2008 18:37:29 GMT -5
Um... I wouldn't call the NWA a competitor with the WWE in this day and age... or any independent promotion for that matter -_- Doesn't matter. People will come out just because it's a WWE star on the bill. Why should the WWE allow it's stars to promote other feds? The WWE makes no money off of it (other than possibly an appearance fee). They get none of the gate. Why should some other fed benefit from a star the WWE made?You had me until that part. WWE made Ric Flair?!?  |
|
|
|
Post by adhaynes on Jun 15, 2008 7:44:28 GMT -5
I wonder if that means he'll be pulled from the MAB Celebrity Sports show in Secaucus NJ in December too. That's not a WWE event.
|
|
