CWE OWNER
Main Eventer
2015
Joined on: Oct 1, 2005 20:47:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,896
|
Post by CWE OWNER on Dec 15, 2007 21:39:09 GMT -5
Now i don't wanna start a fight or arguement. So lets discuss this like adults. But a fact i noted about TNA. Is that a wrestler jumps from WWE to TNA. TNA treat them as they have just come from the big place. Unlike WWE who treats wrestlers that came from TNA to WWE then they treat them as if there no ones or people who are just making there debut. For exzample. Monty Brown TNA to WWE As Marcos Cor Von. Brown was a huge star in TNA but gets pushed down to a low carder on some crappy remake show ECW. On the other hand when WWE Tomko & Test & Christian came from WWE to TNA. The commentators and storylines revolve around there past persona. Discuss
|
|
|
|
Post by gunnerbri on Dec 15, 2007 21:59:48 GMT -5
WWE already have enough star power meaning they can afford to start afresh with certain characters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Dec 15, 2007 22:13:41 GMT -5
It's because WWE is bigger than TNA. When a person of noted popularity (Whether you are John Cena over or Tomko Over) goes from the bigger place to the little league, they seem WAY bigger of a superstar. When a REALLY big star from the little league goes up to the big leagues, they have to try alot harder and unless they are really good, they are going to take longer to move up the ladder in the bigger promotion. It's kind of like the NHL, if Ty Conklin goes from being back up goalie for some team in the NHL to the AHL, Conklin would likely look better their so he might start more often in the AHL. Where as someone moving from the little league (AHL, WHL, etc) to the NHL will probably have to try harder to get a guarenteed spot on the team unless you are like Sidney Crosby or Alexander Ovechkin... It's all the same dynamic...
|
|
Erdrtyu
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 9, 2007 19:07:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,291
|
Post by Erdrtyu on Dec 15, 2007 22:23:37 GMT -5
Creepy, I was thinking this exact same thing a couple of days ago. I do agree with you. You don't see people debute in WWE in a Main Event of a PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 15, 2007 22:48:30 GMT -5
It all boils down to one thing: if WWE were to push a TNA guy the way TNA pushed him, they're essentially acknowledging that TNA is just as good as they are, which is not something WWE wants their fans to believe.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Dec 16, 2007 1:07:10 GMT -5
It all boils down to one thing: if WWE were to push a TNA guy the way TNA pushed him, they're essentially acknowledging that TNA is just as good as they are, which is not something WWE wants their fans to believe. Exactly, and contrastly, what does TNA do? |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Dec 16, 2007 2:04:12 GMT -5
^^^^
Put the WWE guy over their stars 95% of the time...
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 6:33:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2007 6:30:42 GMT -5
It's because WWE is bigger than TNA. I think its as simple as that. And I thoght Marcus Cor Von got put over pretty well by the announcers for TNA. Cause I remember Taz going oh yeah, I heard about this guy! |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Dec 16, 2007 9:25:52 GMT -5
It's because WWE is bigger than TNA. I think its as simple as that. And I thoght Marcus Cor Von got put over pretty well by the announcers for TNA. Cause I remember Taz going oh yeah, I heard about this guy! Yeah heard of him as an ex football player, not a tna wrestler or wrestler in general. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Dec 16, 2007 9:47:16 GMT -5
^^^^ Put the WWE guy over their stars 95% of the time... DING DING DING!!! which translates to: "Hey are wrestlers aren't as good as yours and our show isnt as good as yours as a consequence" OR Gun, shoot, foot! BRILLIANT STRATEGY!!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by thunderliger on Dec 16, 2007 13:59:14 GMT -5
Every WWE name in TNA is hailed as an 'aquisition' and pushed. Every blow TNA gives WWE is celebrated in a very obvious way.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 16, 2007 15:39:27 GMT -5
Every WWE name in TNA is hailed as an 'aquisition' and pushed. Every blow TNA gives WWE is celebrated in a very obvious way. And WWE retaliates by acquiring the likes of Monty Brown and Frankie Kazarian...and promptly proceeding to make them look like jokes. Well, OK, maybe Kazarian was partially to blame for his situation...but still. |
|
|
|
Post by bowlofpetunias on Dec 16, 2007 22:40:02 GMT -5
Every WWE name in TNA is hailed as an 'aquisition' and pushed. Every blow TNA gives WWE is celebrated in a very obvious way. And WWE retaliates by acquiring the likes of Monty Brown and Frankie Kazarian...and promptly proceeding to make them look like jokes. Well, OK, maybe Kazarian was partially to blame for his situation...but still. Hey, I watched Velocity for an entire month because of Kazarian. |
|
|
|
Post by thunderliger on Dec 17, 2007 4:26:15 GMT -5
I never knew Kaz was in WWE  |
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on Dec 17, 2007 4:53:02 GMT -5
I never knew Kaz was in WWE Indeed, he was. He had a bunch of Velocity matches, and was actually undefeated, I believe. He never made it to Smackdown! but he had some kickass matches with Paul London, Brian Kendrick, etc. I wish he'd have stayed, because the Cruiserweight Division was brilliant at that stage. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Dec 17, 2007 10:12:12 GMT -5
The alleged story goes that after this undefeated month, Kazarian went to pitch ideas to a writer, and the writer had no idea who he was, so Kazarian got frustrated and quit.
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Dec 17, 2007 17:25:57 GMT -5
They really just do this because Vince doesn't want to put over talent from another promotion unless they really have a fan following. Cor Von didn't have that much of a following.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Dec 18, 2007 16:08:50 GMT -5
bottom line is as lng as TNA sees WWE aquisitions as bigger than there own talent, TNA will always be seen as WWE lite, the B show, second rate, etc. And that's their own stupid fault!
|
|
