|
Post by nohomo on Jan 1, 2008 15:57:59 GMT -5
Dutch Mantell. Usage of their X-Division and Homegrown stars. Hiring all these has-beens (Dudleys, Hall, Nash) as WRESTLERS. If they were managers or writers that be ok, but don't hire 51 year old wrestlers, if your company's slogan is "New face of professional wrestling" Right on the spot with that one If TNA IS the Future, then why is Sting, Steiner, Nash and Team 3D wrestling? Sure, they have some Value to them to what they have done in the past, but TNA should be the Future and should be pushing their own talent. Their have value based on what they have done. TNA is cashing in on their names. It's easier to get new fans to tune in if you've got recognizable names. I'm not saying that I agree with what TNA is doing, this is just the way they are probably looking at it.
|
|
rollinhardcore
Main Eventer
No ghost humping
Joined on: Sept 17, 2005 22:14:25 GMT -5
Posts: 2,192
|
Post by rollinhardcore on Jan 1, 2008 16:17:51 GMT -5
Being a wrestling company.
|
|
|
Post by nohomo on Jan 1, 2008 17:43:29 GMT -5
Being a wrestling company. Greatest post of 2008. It'll be hard for anyone top this.
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jan 1, 2008 18:06:56 GMT -5
Letting Angle virtually take control... and not putting the belt on Joe...
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 2, 2008 21:04:16 GMT -5
5) 3D kidnapping the X-Tittle, and bassicly making them X Stars. I don't think that made Team 3D X Division stars, but it certain made the entire X Division look weak. It made Jay Lethal look the weakest of them all since he's been the X Division champion during the entire angle and has done almost nothing to get his title back. If Team 3D is about to compete in an X-Division signature match, and the other 4 guys in the match are X-Division stars, then I think it's safe to say that they're officially X-Division competitors, whether TNA wants to admit it or not.
|
|
newfrigginshow
Main Eventer
NFS
Joined on: Jul 13, 2006 8:23:46 GMT -5
Posts: 1,427
|
Post by newfrigginshow on Jan 3, 2008 11:40:45 GMT -5
Trying too hard to be a bigger company than they are. Ditch the fireworks and ditch the six sided ring. What always made them different was their X division, simple storylines, and good solid wrestling. All that has been replaced by too many backstage skits, a devalued x division, and Original talent getting tv time taken away by former wwe guys. ECW had the right idea back in the day when they hid their weaknesses and just went with what they did best.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Jan 3, 2008 12:52:06 GMT -5
Trying too hard to be a bigger company than they are. Ditch the fireworks and ditch the six sided ring. What always made them different was their X division, simple storylines, and good solid wrestling. All that has been replaced by too many backstage skits, a devalued x division, and Original talent getting tv time taken away by former wwe guys. ECW had the right idea back in the day when they hid their weaknesses and just went with what they did best. Well said. I completely agree with everything you said, though I would probably keep the six-sided ring because it adds some exciting spots for the X-Division.
|
|
robl7up
Main Eventer
139 refs
Joined on: Feb 16, 2006 12:34:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,848
|
Post by robl7up on Jan 12, 2008 12:02:29 GMT -5
Get rid of that freakin 6 sided ring!
|
|
|
Post by jorge4903 on Jan 12, 2008 13:04:45 GMT -5
putting too much time into ex-wwe garbage. turning their own aj styles into an f'n joke, not pushing samoa joe to the world title, turning jay lethal into a joke. I feel like I'm watching wcw in their last year.
|
|
|
Post by papiontheshortbus on Jan 15, 2008 1:17:24 GMT -5
Making AJ a heel(he and Jeff Hardy reason why I started watching TNA). Not using that much of "actual" x-divison matches(springboards, suicide dives, moonsaults, 450 splashes, etc.). Breaking up AMW. Having weak usage of tag team divison. Having a lot of monster chacters(estimate: 10). Dumbass gimmicks("the guru"sonjay dutt, "maple leaf muscle"petey ING williams, no more needed, figure it out). Too many old WCW wrestlers(Scott Stiener, I got my eye on you). Merchandice not sold at many of major retailers. I'm stopping right here because I could go on, and on, and on...
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jan 15, 2008 5:05:52 GMT -5
TNA's biggest mistake is letting Kurt Angle have Impact revolve around him.
|
|
Returnal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 5, 2005 3:05:14 GMT -5
Posts: 3,679
|
Post by Returnal on Jan 16, 2008 9:23:33 GMT -5
TNA's biggest mistake is letting Kurt Angle have Impact revolve around him. Yeah basing the show around one of there biggest stars and there current World Champion is there biggest mistake...
|
|
Eskimo Joe
Main Eventer
Signature Pharmacy
Joined on: Dec 6, 2004 16:56:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,757
|
Post by Eskimo Joe on Jan 16, 2008 11:18:56 GMT -5
TNA's biggest mistake is letting Kurt Angle have Impact revolve around him. Yeah basing the show around one of there biggest stars and there current World Champion is there biggest mistake... I think he meant that since Kurt Angle has come to TNA, it's been Total Nonstop Angle. You should have your champion be the focus of your show, but putting every single title on one guy is ridiculous. I don't care who it is.
|
|
|
Post by JTG on Jan 16, 2008 22:51:06 GMT -5
I agree. AJ was their top face for a long time and now he's lost in the shuffle with all the "big names" that they've brought it. I hope he turns face soon and goes against Angle for the TNA Title.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jan 16, 2008 22:51:59 GMT -5
Being a wrestling company. lmao
|
|
|
Post by The Dude on Jan 18, 2008 20:08:09 GMT -5
Yeah basing the show around one of there biggest stars and there current World Champion is there biggest mistake... I think he meant that since Kurt Angle has come to TNA, it's been Total Nonstop Angle. You should have your champion be the focus of your show, but putting every single title on one guy is ridiculous. I don't care who it is. Yeah that's what I meant. Everything is all Kurt Angle, it's getting old. and BTW I think that Angle should have won the ECW title before leaving WWE, that way he would be the most decorated champion in the history of professional wrestling.
|
|
|
Post by BV on Jan 18, 2008 20:24:53 GMT -5
Letting Angle take over, hiring Booker T, degrading AJ Styles, not giving James Storm a push he damn sure deserves and hiring Blackdust..oh i mean black reign
|
|
|
Post by hardyboyzwwe on Jan 18, 2008 22:06:05 GMT -5
having shark boy rip off stone cold
|
|
Eskimo Joe
Main Eventer
Signature Pharmacy
Joined on: Dec 6, 2004 16:56:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,757
|
Post by Eskimo Joe on Jan 19, 2008 16:05:29 GMT -5
hiring Blackdust..oh i mean black reign I agree. It makes me sick every time I think about the fact that he is featured attraction while poor Petey Williams is working the undercard with Scott Steiner. I mean, freakin' 3 Live Kru was better than Black Reign. And that, is pathetic by every meaning of the word.
|
|
|
Post by ovw4life on Jan 19, 2008 16:58:15 GMT -5
The biggest mistake TNA's making is, not giving Robert Roode the TNA Title.
|
|