Post by deskjet on Aug 9, 2008 21:31:56 GMT -5
I never said it wasnt a positive for TNA. the question is why is it that TNA can only book one aspect of thier show correctly to draw high ratings and not the rest of the show. that's what the numbers tell you. Peoplple are obviously tuning in to what they like, which begs the question, what a bout the rest of the show? You can rationalize that people like the women better, or that people wanna catch the main event, or that their's a bunch of pervs out there. the problem is the lack of consistency through the whole show...which IS a direct reflection on the booking committee which, Overall, Is more negative than positvie.
It's not always booking's fault though. Some people don't tune in for MCMG/Joe and others because they don't know who they are, usually why they lose ratings during some of their segments. Also another reason as to why Angle drew more ratings than Joe, it's about being known. Also, the main events usually lose ratings on shows, so this increasing ratings shows how regardless of what you wanna say, the Knockouts draw.
So how many of these knockouts are "known" that would be the reason for a ratings spike? taylor Wilde? Roxxi? Velvet sky? You're trying to tell me the average person knows these people better than Booker T, Sting, Rhino, etc? Yeah right! Maybe if they think they're porn stars. sorry your rationale isn't convincing me.
