|
|
Post by littlerock947 on Aug 9, 2008 0:38:36 GMT -5
I allready know theres a different topic simpler about this with WWE letting go all these superstars that can still do different things and last year this happen with WWE letting go these superstar but that was differnt they didn't follow the rules and what not everyone knows that story about the let go of a number of superstars such as Booker T.The question is what happen and why.And Why can't WWE does this for a change keep with there ideas but look into what the fans want why can't they do some thing like go to a ppv and talk to people in the line and hear there suggestions and have an open conversation online.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 9, 2008 0:48:52 GMT -5
Cuz Vince knows what we want.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 9, 2008 0:51:52 GMT -5
The fans in line would tell them to continue what they are doing. Internet fans are a very small number.
If WF had it's way, the WWE would end up folding, because the IWC cannot support the WWE by itself.
|
|
|
|
Post by littlerock947 on Aug 9, 2008 2:20:42 GMT -5
Why did WWE let them go.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Aug 9, 2008 2:34:27 GMT -5
I personally believer it's mostly the wrestler who asks for a release, but WWE wants to look strong and say they released them....
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Aug 9, 2008 2:42:50 GMT -5
It's called cutting costs, trimming the fat... when you are old enough to understand how business works... you'll know why  |
|
|
|
Post by The-Rock on Aug 9, 2008 2:51:45 GMT -5
WWE has via Cyber Sunday and Taboo Tuesday. the truth of the matter is what WWE books is what the common fan would love to see. in terms of firing guys, its like any other sport...once an athlete is underperforming or of little use to a team they let him go to make way for new/up and coming athletes who are less expensive. It's a tremendous cost to employ a wrestler and not use him, not to mention wrestlers don't like traveling and not wrestling as they don't receeve their bonuses for appearances and they are away from their families for pretty much no reason at all. The guys WWE has let go (with the exception of Big daddy V) have been good decisions from a business stand point. If you ever take economics you'll learn about the law of diminishing marginal returns...and that will explain why they fire people/choose not to have such a large roster. I did a report on the Economics of Pro Wrestling and you'd be suprised how much thought goes into the simplest of decisions.
|
|
