|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 5, 2008 22:07:39 GMT -5
Championship Maintenance PUNK for the [glow=red,2,300]WIN![/glow] I have to say that the fight he had was very fun to read! ;D TNA is far inferior to WWE. Sure some of there knockouts are better wrestlers than some of our divas but, TNA's title has had 3 champions so far. But the divas are better. TNa wants to push Shantell Taylor who sucks then they can do that but Beth would squash her in one second! Hell Michelle Mccool may even beat her..  The wwe women's title has been around for over 50 years and has been the best women's belt a women's wrestle can win. There is NO denying that. And TNA is very second rate compared to WWE. Impact can barely beat ECW! That is sad..  Back to the main topic, Gail Kim. If she retakes her job at TNA she must like getting screwed because she is the BEST KO in TNA and the Kos get the best ratings yet get crapfor pay? I hope she used her logic in her decision.. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 5, 2008 22:12:46 GMT -5
Lol, you do reliaze wrestling's scripted right? I find it funny how everyone acts like Gail sucks yet if she goes to WWE she'll be some kind of God.
Also, I'm about sick of hearing how ECW can beat iMPACT. No crap - it's a WWE product. You act like it's some small indy fed on TV beating them. WWE promotes ECW since it's their product there for they get promotion 2 nights a week (During RAW and ECW) while iMPACT only has iMPACT to promote iMPACT and when SpikeTV gets off their can and promotes them. RAW gets 2's and 3s and SD gets 2's - take the fans watching that and they watch ECW because it's WWE. Simple as that.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 5, 2008 23:52:43 GMT -5
So do you agree that Impact's ratings are sad?
What's your opinion on the Ko's mostly getting the best ratings yet getting paid the least?
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 5, 2008 23:56:21 GMT -5
No, it's not "sad" with TNA only being 6 years. People's going to bring up how the orginal ECW got higer ratings at 1am or whatever it was but that was during a "boom" period and there's not one today. Rating's don't mean a better product really. Also, when Gail signed with TNA (just like all the KO's) they didn't know they was gonna be this big. But they're not going to get near what the men paid - period and FACT. It's a male dominated bussiness and will always be.  |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 5, 2008 23:59:22 GMT -5
Well then how come the ratings show that the females dominate?
Gail is renegoiating her contract and if she is smart she would demand more $ than she was earning in her old contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 6, 2008 0:00:32 GMT -5
They're not dominating the BUSINESS. Wrestling is proven to be a mans sport.. hence why men = higher pay.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 6, 2008 0:03:37 GMT -5
Of course men will be paid more $ than women, it's not right all the time but shouldn't the gab be closing if the women do a good job and pull their weight?
Do you think that the ratings for Impact would be less if all the KO's were gone?
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 6, 2008 0:07:44 GMT -5
No and No. Not every single guy makes six figures like people assume - Sting & Angle are the two top paid guys. Sting's pay is rumored around 500,000. Gail nor non of the other knockouts deerve that.
Now, you're just being whatever. The Knockouts aren't bringing in new fans. The fans that are watching every week (that 1.0/1.1 group) are just watching the Knockouts over other things on the show. They're not making the ratings "sky rocket" to 1.2-1.5. If they did yeah - pay them as much as the "boys". The ratings have been the same as they were before the Knockouts division started.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 6, 2008 0:18:56 GMT -5
No and No. Not every single guy makes six figures like people assume - Sting & Angle are the two top paid guys. Sting's pay is rumored around 500,000. Gail nor non of the other knockouts deerve that. Now, you're just being whatever. The Knockouts aren't bringing in new fans. The fans that are watching every week (that 1.0/1.1 group) are just watching the Knockouts over other things on the show. They're not making the ratings "sky rocket" to 1.2-1.5. If they did yeah - pay them as much as the "boys". The ratings have been the same as they were before the Knockouts division started. So how much do you think Gail deserves? I don't think she deserves $500,000 but neither does Sting. He sucks. Angle deserves that since he is a great wrestler and carried the company on his back. Do you know what the amount that Gail was paid in her old deal? |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Sept 6, 2008 0:23:48 GMT -5
I don't know. That's why I'm a fan and I'm not in the business. I don't care how much she gets paid because it has no affect on the product. If she thinks she deserves more money go to the WWE and more power to her. If she would rather stay where she loves then she won't care about the money. I'm done with this man. We both have our opinions and it was nice to finally have a discussion without name calling.  |
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 6, 2008 0:40:36 GMT -5
I don't know. That's why I'm a fan and I'm not in the business. I don't care how much she gets paid because it has no affect on the product. If she thinks she deserves more money go to the WWE and more power to her. If she would rather stay where she loves then she won't care about the money. I'm done with this man. We both have our opinions and it was nice to finally have a discussion without name calling. I didn't name call? It must be the warning bar.. It "kinda" puts me in check!  LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Sept 6, 2008 2:36:20 GMT -5
Championship Maintenance PUNK for the [glow=red,2,300]WIN![/glow] I have to say that the fight he had was very fun to read! ;D TNA is far inferior to WWE. Sure some of there knockouts are better wrestlers than some of our divas but, TNA's title has had 3 champions so far. But the divas are better. TNa wants to push Shantell Taylor who sucks then they can do that but Beth would squash her in one second! Hell Michelle Mccool may even beat her.. The wwe women's title has been around for over 50 years and has been the best women's belt a women's wrestle can win. There is NO denying that. And TNA is very second rate compared to WWE. Impact can barely beat ECW! That is sad.. Back to the main topic, Gail Kim. If she retakes her job at TNA she must like getting screwed because she is the BEST KO in TNA and the Kos get the best ratings yet get **** for pay? I hope she used her logic in her decision.. I don't agree with you on that.. Shantelle Taylor does not suck - she can wrestle.. The problem I have with her as champ, is that there should be a pecking order, for the Knockouts title - and she should be at the bottom of it.. |
|
warmachine76
Main Eventer
Big Sexy! I'm gonna kick your ass from here to Jacksonville!
Joined on: May 30, 2006 13:43:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by warmachine76 on Sept 6, 2008 9:09:39 GMT -5
Championship Maintenance PUNK for the [glow=red,2,300]WIN![/glow] I have to say that the fight he had was very fun to read! ;D TNA is far inferior to WWE. Sure some of there knockouts are better wrestlers than some of our divas but, TNA's title has had 3 champions so far. But the divas are better. TNa wants to push Shantell Taylor who sucks then they can do that but Beth would squash her in one second! Hell Michelle Mccool may even beat her.. The wwe women's title has been around for over 50 years and has been the best women's belt a women's wrestle can win. There is NO denying that. And TNA is very second rate compared to WWE. Impact can barely beat ECW! That is sad.. Back to the main topic, Gail Kim. If she retakes her job at TNA she must like getting screwed because she is the BEST KO in TNA and the Kos get the best ratings yet get **** for pay? I hope she used her logic in her decision.. I don't agree with you on that.. Shantelle Taylor does not suck - she can wrestle.. The problem I have with her as champ, is that there should be a pecking order, for the Knockouts title - and she should be at the bottom of it.. I completely agree with you on Taylor. I didn't mind the quick hot shot title run but they need to get the title off of her now. I'm hoping that Angelina Love will win it at No Surrender. That would be a breath of fresh air. |
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Sept 6, 2008 19:37:26 GMT -5
Gail Kim needs to stay in TNA
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Sept 7, 2008 20:19:29 GMT -5
Championship Maintenance PUNK for the [glow=red,2,300]WIN![/glow] I have to say that the fight he had was very fun to read! ;D TNA is far inferior to WWE. Sure some of there knockouts are better wrestlers than some of our divas but, TNA's title has had 3 champions so far. But the divas are better. TNa wants to push Shantell Taylor who sucks then they can do that but Beth would squash her in one second! Hell Michelle Mccool may even beat her.. The wwe women's title has been around for over 50 years and has been the best women's belt a women's wrestle can win. There is NO denying that. And TNA is very second rate compared to WWE. Impact can barely beat ECW! That is sad.. Back to the main topic, Gail Kim. If she retakes her job at TNA she must like getting screwed because she is the BEST KO in TNA and the Kos get the best ratings yet get **** for pay? I hope she used her logic in her decision.. I don't agree with you on that.. Shantelle Taylor does not suck - she can wrestle.. The problem I have with her as champ, is that there should be a pecking order, for the Knockouts title - and she should be at the bottom of it.. The reason why I hate Shantell is because she got the title before other KO's who were there WAY longer than her. She is an undeserving ho who imo can't wrestle that good. |
|
