|
Post by brentleyjames81 on Dec 8, 2008 1:55:22 GMT -5
I have a feeling its gonna be better then WrestleMania 17 & 19. Just look @ the rumoured matches already.
HBK/Taker Austin/Orton Cena/Batista Edge/J.Hardy.......THESE 4 MATCHES WOULD MAKE WM25 THE GREATEST
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Dec 8, 2008 1:58:55 GMT -5
I doubt it'll top 17 for me tbh.
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Dec 8, 2008 2:00:55 GMT -5
I don't know... But WWE will go all out for it, for sure! I'm looking forward to it!
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Dec 8, 2008 2:01:05 GMT -5
The matches look good on paper.. i dont think they will live up to the hype.
|
|
Eskimo Joe
Main Eventer
Signature Pharmacy
Joined on: Dec 6, 2004 16:56:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,757
|
Post by Eskimo Joe on Dec 8, 2008 3:01:31 GMT -5
Topping seventeen with the company in the state that it's in would be really hard. It would especially be hard to top it, in my mind at least, with a show that has Batista vs. Cena on the card.
|
|
|
Post by Deadshot on Dec 8, 2008 3:14:00 GMT -5
Considering the quality of feuds/PPVs recently...it won't come anywhere close to the best. Well, maybe if Cena/Batista is the most important WWE match ever to you. WM 17 was great. Austin/Rock still goes down as the best match/feud/ending in WWE history in my eyes. You also had a very solid list of matches. What a damn good WrestleMania...
|
|
|
Post by scsa on Dec 8, 2008 3:40:43 GMT -5
Wrestlemania 17 > all
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Dec 8, 2008 3:54:36 GMT -5
Better than Mania X7? Not think so. Maniax7 is BEST WrestleMania EVER. I dont think new attitude era will better than that tbh.
|
|
dtldiva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 25, 2005 11:29:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,132
|
Post by dtldiva on Dec 8, 2008 7:36:33 GMT -5
I have a feeling its gonna be better then WrestleMania 17 & 19. Just look @ the rumoured matches already.
HBK/Taker Austin/Orton Cena/Batista Edge/J.Hardy.......THESE 4 MATCHES WOULD MAKE WM25 THE GREATEST I'd rather see Triple H and Hardy have a match since their rivalry is going pretty good and what about a triple threat with HBK/Taker/Austin, now that would be a killer match!!
|
|
|
Post by hugemetsfan on Dec 8, 2008 8:10:00 GMT -5
I have a feeling its gonna be better then WrestleMania 17 & 19. Just look @ the rumoured matches already.
HBK/Taker Austin/Orton Cena/Batista Edge/J.Hardy.......THESE 4 MATCHES WOULD MAKE WM25 THE GREATEST Those are some Crazy mother ing matches
|
|
|
Post by Great White Shark on Dec 8, 2008 8:43:59 GMT -5
I really think it should be Austin vs Cena and not Orton.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 8, 2008 9:34:09 GMT -5
In order for them to top Wrestlemania X-Seven, the product would have to be, you know, enjoyable.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 8, 2008 10:22:42 GMT -5
In order for them to top Wrestlemania X-Seven, the product would have to be, you know, enjoyable. Could not have said it any better.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 8, 2008 10:25:43 GMT -5
In order for them to top Wrestlemania X-Seven, the product would have to be, you know, enjoyable. While I don't fully agree as I currently enjoy the product, it is all about the Rumble and forward. It's not just the matches that were incredible that blew every other 'Mania away, but it was about the build up to them. Shane vs. Vince and the Rock vs. Steve Austin were both feuds that were just untouchable. It really depends on how the next couple of months going leading to those matches. But yes, on paper, it does look like this has possibilities at being one of the best 'Manias ever. I don't see it topping 17, but I have faith that it'll be a classic.
|
|
|
Post by instant classic on Dec 8, 2008 11:07:02 GMT -5
Austin vs Taker vs Michaels plz
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Dec 8, 2008 12:08:29 GMT -5
Nothing will ever top Wrestlemania 19 as the greatest Wrestlemania of all time.
I like 17, but 19 takes it for me.
|
|
|
Post by man on Dec 8, 2008 12:09:15 GMT -5
WM 17 was alright, but I don't think it was the best.
You guys only say that because VAST MAJORITY here grew up with the Attitude era. That's why Austin/Rock seems so big to you. In reality, it pales to the hype of Hogan/Andre or Hogan/Warrior.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Dec 8, 2008 12:15:01 GMT -5
WM 17 was alright, but I don't think it was the best. You guys only say that because VAST MAJORITY here grew up with the Attitude era. That's why Austin/Rock seems so big to you. In reality, it pales to the hype of Hogan/Andre or Hogan/Warrior. That maybe true, but WM X7 was great not just because of the Main Event, but for its solid undercard.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 8, 2008 12:18:20 GMT -5
WM 17 was alright, but I don't think it was the best. You guys only say that because VAST MAJORITY here grew up with the Attitude era. That's why Austin/Rock seems so big to you. In reality, it pales to the hype of Hogan/Andre or Hogan/Warrior. I disagree. Even life long fans say that 17 was the best. It wasn't just the feuds, it was the matches themselves. Angle vs. Benoit, the TLC, Austin vs. the Rock, and Shane vs. Vince were all arguable ****+ each, while you had Eddie Guerrero vs. Test, Chris Jericho vs. William Regal, and the Undertaker vs. Triple H around the *** range. I started watching in 1993, well before the Attitude era, and I hate the Attitude era and think it's highly overrated on these boards. I still call 17 the best for the incredible Austin vs. Rock feud and the amazing card is put on. The only bad match was Chyna vs. Ivory, but it served its purpose, and everything else (the Hardcore title match, the Gimmick Battle Royal, APA and Tazz vs. Right to Censor) was good, harmless fun. You really just don't get better than that.
|
|
CMC
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 18, 2008 10:34:53 GMT -5
Posts: 2,373
|
Post by CMC on Dec 8, 2008 12:28:08 GMT -5
nothing could top wrestlemania 17. that was awesome
|
|