|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jan 16, 2009 9:39:31 GMT -5
I just saw SD and it was a tag match between swagger & henry vs finlay & hardy. Swagger took the pinfall. Why the hell would wwe do this, the momentum he had just got destroyed. He took his 1st pinfall loss in a tag match right after winning the ECW title, what the hell were they thinking. This is a very stupid decision in my view.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by reddragon94 on Jan 16, 2009 9:43:09 GMT -5
well i think they were dumb to since he was undefeated winning streak and it ending in a tag match which sucks
|
|
|
|
Post by PhoeniX™: Valoween on Jan 16, 2009 9:44:08 GMT -5
WWE seem to try to push new stars....and then go back on it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deadshot on Jan 16, 2009 10:26:36 GMT -5
Haha..
What a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by White Trash Lucha on Jan 16, 2009 10:27:34 GMT -5
I agree he had great momentum and WWE just ruined it
|
|
|
|
Post by machoking on Jan 16, 2009 10:32:58 GMT -5
Well Hardy pinned him, so I don't see much harm in it; personally.
Swagger needed a loss eventually and why not give it to Hardy after he had just lost the ECW Championship. Hardy gets a 'big' win and Swagger takes his first loss from a somewhat credible opponent.
|
|
craignwo4life
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Oct 25, 2008 15:58:32 GMT -5
Posts: 132
|
Post by craignwo4life on Jan 16, 2009 10:37:15 GMT -5
He's a singles wrestler who is still undefeated in singles competition so it won't do much damage to his reputation and it wasn't as though he has been built up an an indestructable figure like Goldberg once was.
A champion needs an opponent......!!
|
|
|
|
Post by lancewiget on Jan 16, 2009 11:04:41 GMT -5
His streak in WWE is nothing. He went 62-0 in Developmental. I do agree that he shouldn't of lost in a tag match, a non-title rematch would have been a better way to do so.
|
|
warmachine76
Main Eventer
Big Sexy! I'm gonna kick your ass from here to Jacksonville!
Joined on: May 30, 2006 13:43:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,032
|
Post by warmachine76 on Jan 16, 2009 11:27:21 GMT -5
Who really cares. This guy shouldn't have a title anyway. I can't stand listening to his lispy voice. Sounds like a total idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by ericbischoff on Jan 16, 2009 11:27:51 GMT -5
Yeah, I read spoiler, and I think that was silly. undefeated winning streak won ECW Champion, then now his undefeated winning streak end. Make no sense
|
|
Vintage ToneBoat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 27, 2008 14:17:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,097
|
Post by Vintage ToneBoat on Jan 16, 2009 11:33:20 GMT -5
he will drop the belt back to hardly in less than a month im calling it
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Jan 16, 2009 11:54:16 GMT -5
I agree. What a sad way to end his "undefeated streak" though Finaly has beat him at house shows tons of times.
|
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Jan 16, 2009 12:09:54 GMT -5
I hate that he's even ECW Champion. He does not deserve to hold that title. He has so much more to prove.
|
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on Jan 16, 2009 12:34:54 GMT -5
I agree thats stupid. they should of had him go 2 more months then lose a non title match too Ricky Ortiz and beat Ortiz in all title matches. Then lose the belt in a hardcore match too Tommy Dreamer then win it back 2 months later.
|
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Jan 16, 2009 12:51:00 GMT -5
WWE are beyond belief sometimes, basically Triple H is a ****.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 18:34:15 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2009 13:27:20 GMT -5
What does Triple H have to do with Hager?
|
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Jan 16, 2009 14:31:16 GMT -5
1 step forward, 3 steps back with the WWE.... *Sigh*
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 16, 2009 16:05:09 GMT -5
The wwe is stupid for putting the title on him right now..
They are even stupider to just make him have his first loss on a regular sd..
I'm sure in a month they will act like it never happend, the wwe likes to erase things.. ?
|
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on Jan 16, 2009 16:13:24 GMT -5
What does Triple H have to do with Hager? You haven't noticed that what goes up right now in the wwe generally goes down just as fast? They, the wwe and HHH, do not seem to want anyone to rise to the top. Yh this is only one loss and not that big of a deal really but what if he stayed unbeaten for alot longer and got moved up the totumpole and eventually lost to someone like HBK or Taker, they should have run with this for alot longer. Same with Punk's run a couple years back, it establishes them as "main event calibre" guys, even if they turn out to be shoddy in the ring, not saying either are, it gives them more ebb. |
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Jan 16, 2009 17:26:54 GMT -5
At first I thought it was dumb, but not anymore. A lot of the times an "Undefeated Streak" isn't a good label to have. Because, when they finally get that loss, it takes away so much momentum (such as Goldberg). But if they get the loss out of the way, then the next time they lose it isn't the world's biggest deal.
|
|
