|
Post by P@ul on Jan 5, 2010 2:12:48 GMT -5
RING OF HONOR ON HDNET!!!
Richards/Strong was an unreal match.
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jan 5, 2010 2:16:03 GMT -5
F*cking seriously?! There is no war! Next week TNA goes back to Thursday night, pre-taped, and WWE goes back to Monday, live. It's not a war. It was a battle. In order to have this be "night one", there would need to be a "night two", which, for the forseeable future, will NOT happen. Jeez. I love You
|
|
zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Jan 5, 2010 2:34:29 GMT -5
F*cking seriously?! There is no war! Next week TNA goes back to Thursday night, pre-taped, and WWE goes back to Monday, live. It's not a war. It was a battle. In order to have this be "night one", there would need to be a "night two", which, for the forseeable future, will NOT happen. Jeez. its only the start of the war. im for TNA, it kept me more entertained then raw did and when i was watching raw i had to turn back to tna to see what was going on.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 20:11:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2010 3:10:22 GMT -5
There's no chance that TNA won in the ratings, but as far as quality, I think they were a bit better. There's a lot of things in TNA that make me roll my eyes on a regular basis, and that didn't change tonight. But I really felt that they were trying their damnedest to put on a great show. Raw wasn't bad, but aside from Bret's presence, it was a thoroughly average show, nothing special about it.
|
|
dam
Main Eventer
Number 4? I wanna be number 1
Joined on: Jan 22, 2008 18:57:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,024
|
Post by dam on Jan 5, 2010 4:01:28 GMT -5
I hate to say it but I think TNA. How many times do we need to see the same matches over and over?
|
|
sevb30
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 14, 2008 12:55:21 GMT -5
Posts: 1,378
|
Post by sevb30 on Jan 5, 2010 5:17:20 GMT -5
This is an inherently WWE forum so it's gonna be slanted in their favor, but notice it's not even winning by that much! 50 some to 40 some in favor of the WWE, in a WWE biased forum!
|
|
Irish Gaz
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Nov 10, 2009 17:31:48 GMT -5
Posts: 159
|
Post by Irish Gaz on Jan 5, 2010 5:52:34 GMT -5
To be perfectly honest, I would sum it down to this. As someone said, it is not a war, due to the fact that last night was only a one-off in the sense that TNA will be moving back to pre-taped shows airing on Thursday. So, I don't think WWE recognise TNA or a war at the moment. Basically, IMO, TNA were trying their hardest to show WWE that they will step up and try to capture more viewers. Whereas WWE were showing that they don't even have to step up and they will still win against TNA (which, by the way, they will). Thus, TNA provided a good show. In contrast, WWE put on a similar show to the one we see each week (with the exception of the return of the Hitman)
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Jan 5, 2010 6:06:57 GMT -5
TNA definatly had more suprises. Yeah, nothing but a bunch of WWE rejects from what I heard. TNA is doing the same thing WCW did in the past and I'm sorry, but it just won't work. Hiring nothing but a bunch of WWE rejects will get your company NOWHERE. WCW tried that and they went bankrupt. And they were a whole hell of alot bigger than TNA is, that's for sure and they still bit the bullet. Here's a list of debuts and returns from TNA last night: -Hulk Hogan (HUGE WWE reject.) -Eric Bischoff (WWE reject) -Ric Flair (WWE reject that doesn't know when to walk away) -Jeff Hardy (Burn out druggie WWE reject) -Shannon Moore (WWE Reject) -Scott Hall (Drunk WWE reject) -Sean Waltman (WWE reject that banged a dude) -The Nasty Boys (Fat pigs who are OLD WWE rejects) -Val Venis (Big WWE reject here) -Orlando Jordan (Geez, TNA is stooping low. Another WWE reject) -Jeff Jarrett (NOBODY cares about this WWE reject) -Sting (Ah, big deal. He's old and washed up. Don't care about him) -Bubba The Love Sponge (Who the ?) Yeah, bringing in Hall, X-Pac, O.J., Venis, Moore, Flair, Druggie Hardy, Bischoff, Sponge-boy, and The Nasty Boys is really going to help the company. That's the most sorry list of ing WWE rejects I've ever seen in my life. Desperate actions by a desperate company, if you ask me. The countdown is on for TNA's demise. Bringing in nothin' but a bunch of Hogan's buddies will be the death of TNA.
|
|
|
Post by The-Rated-Welsh-Superstar on Jan 5, 2010 6:23:28 GMT -5
Wwe Won it!!! yes am a wwe mark Just look at it this way Tna had 3hrs and on that show about 4-5 matchs and had Loads of promos. Now I know Raw has promos but if trying to beat the wwe and all u do is Bash the wwe for about the frist 5 mins Then you bring back old wwe wrestlers. Frist - Jeff Hardy (wow...he's gone to a company thats more lack on drugs. LOL!!!) Second - Ric Flair ( your retired......no disrepect or anything but plz just Off) Third - Hall & Sean ( What the point!! god its nWo all over again) fourth - Nasty Boys ( LOLz) Last - Hogan & Bischoff ( its not going to make a diff. all they could do with 3hrs was talk. Tna = Tnp=Total Non-Stop Promos) WWE all the way haha
|
|
hbklique1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 8, 2008 23:52:42 GMT -5
Posts: 1,300
|
Post by hbklique1 on Jan 5, 2010 6:47:09 GMT -5
I voted for wwe just cause i thought the overall show was better than tna But if TNA can put out more matches like the kurt/aj or even the knockouts tag match, then i can see themselves slowly but surely becoming competition to wwe
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Jan 5, 2010 7:30:03 GMT -5
Overall I enjoyed iMPACT a lot more than RAW. However Bret's segments were awesome.
I am hoping iMPACT does well rating-wise in hopes of Spike signing them on to a regular time slot on Monday nights.
|
|
|
Post by bobsfedder on Jan 5, 2010 7:30:38 GMT -5
TNA BY FAR! I mean WWE knew it was a battle one tonight and they brought nuttin to the table.I mean their wwe champ again in a sorry match with a jobber.LAME LAME skits with dx and that midget.Most of their show was nothing but talk.TNA did bad in the open making it end in a DQ but Jeff Hardy showing up was huge.Also ric flair but the knockouts match was fantastic just as the tagteam match was.Plus Sting was back but I'm a Sting mark Do you know what bad angles are? (camera angles?) The TNA show had by far the most unprofessional camera work I have seen. I make better shots using a tripod!
|
|
|
Post by The Champ is Here! on Jan 5, 2010 7:56:08 GMT -5
neither.....
|
|
|
Post by bobsfedder on Jan 5, 2010 8:02:20 GMT -5
^^ Yeah you know RAW won it was unreal, great matches and everything. The tag team match was great and Kofi/Orton was another good match too. The ending had everything, and now it''s like a cliff hanger ending I can't wait to see next week's RAW.
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Jan 5, 2010 8:03:24 GMT -5
TNA just tried way to hard if you ask me. Having all these appearances and guests just pop up in the first hour alone just seemed too rushed. I was somewhat paying attention to TNA till Raw came on that was...then after Bret Hart started off Raw...I simply didn't care about anything else. I think I checked back over to TNA twice after that and I just wasn't impressed. I just get such a chuckle at how TNA constantly mocks WWE for this and that...meanwhile the WWE doesn't acknowledge them whatsoever. And until they become a real threat (if that ever happens) they have no reason to do so. I mean Raw wasn't great by any means. But it still had Bret ing Hart. Which is enough to get me to watch any wrestling program.
|
|
eenyc21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2009 10:50:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,873
|
Post by eenyc21 on Jan 5, 2010 11:50:55 GMT -5
I watch both shows religiously and to me it wasn't close. WWE. It seems like tna was on commercial every three minutes. I enjoyed the final two matches tna put on but it wasn't enough for me. The show just seemed to drag along. That's not sayin Raw was great but it was better then what TNA have us.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 5, 2010 12:01:57 GMT -5
I watched both and I didn't think that TNA was that special. Sure they had a few surprises but only Jeff was a real shocker. I mean the Nasty Boys, really? Way to many commercials, & they tried to bring in too many people in just one night. It was an okay show to me.
WWE did some things better than usual. The tension between Hart & HBK and between Hart & Vince was great TV.
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jan 5, 2010 12:05:46 GMT -5
TNA definatly had more suprises. Yeah, nothing but a bunch of WWE rejects from what I heard. TNA is doing the same thing WCW did in the past and I'm sorry, but it just won't work. Hiring nothing but a bunch of WWE rejects will get your company NOWHERE. WCW tried that and they went bankrupt. And they were a whole hell of alot bigger than TNA is, that's for sure and they still bit the bullet. Here's a list of debuts and returns from TNA last night: -Hulk Hogan (HUGE WWE reject.) -Eric Bischoff (WWE reject) -Ric Flair (WWE reject that doesn't know when to walk away) -Jeff Hardy (Burn out druggie WWE reject) -Shannon Moore (WWE Reject) -Scott Hall (Drunk WWE reject) -Sean Waltman (WWE reject that banged a dude) -The Nasty Boys (Fat pigs who are OLD WWE rejects) -Val Venis (Big WWE reject here) -Orlando Jordan (Geez, TNA is stooping low. Another WWE reject) -Jeff Jarrett (NOBODY cares about this WWE reject) -Sting (Ah, big deal. He's old and washed up. Don't care about him) -Bubba The Love Sponge (Who the ?) Yeah, bringing in Hall, X-Pac, O.J., Venis, Moore, Flair, Druggie Hardy, Bischoff, Sponge-boy, and The Nasty Boys is really going to help the company. That's the most sorry list of ing WWE rejects I've ever seen in my life. Desperate actions by a desperate company, if you ask me. The countdown is on for TNA's demise. Bringing in nothin' but a bunch of Hogan's buddies will be the death of TNA. Well the crowd care about Hogan, Hardy, Bischoff and Flair.
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Jan 5, 2010 12:10:55 GMT -5
This. , I wish HDNet was available here.
|
|
|
Post by Gore on Jan 5, 2010 12:24:51 GMT -5
I think the winner can be defined by who is still going to broadcast a show on Monday next week.
|
|