|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 12:06:10 GMT -5
From nodq.com: "The seating chart for the Impact Wrestling World Tour live event on September 17th, 2015 at the Kansas Expocentre in Topeka, KS reveals a ramp leading up to a six-sided ring instead of the traditional four-sided ring. This could be an early indication that the six-sided ring could be making a return to the company. You can check out the chart in the photo posted below." included is this picture. Hopefully maybe that will be one of AJ Styles demands to Dixie or something, because in the Immortal Forever? DVD when they were talking about changing it to a 4 sided ring, AJ said it was stupid and that it was what made TNA unique. Or on the other hand, maybe that arena never updated their seating chart from when TNA use to have the 6 sided ring... I really hope that's not the case.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Oct 23, 2013 12:15:35 GMT -5
The 6 sided ring made TNA unique, I liked it.
|
|
Doctor Worm
Main Eventer
They Call me Doctor Worm, Good morning, How're you? I'm Dr.Worm.
Joined on: Aug 2, 2006 8:04:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,261
|
Post by Doctor Worm on Oct 23, 2013 12:22:33 GMT -5
Hopefully this is the case, because that is one of the things that made TNA, well, TNA. They took the 6 sides and wore it proud.
|
|
China Claus
Main Eventer
I can feeel your sensitivity
Joined on: Apr 17, 2012 20:05:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,737
|
Post by China Claus on Oct 23, 2013 12:30:09 GMT -5
September 2015? That's 2 years away! Who knows if TNA will even be around by then.....
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 12:43:15 GMT -5
September 2015? That's 2 years away! Who knows if TNA will even be around by then..... Just get out of here if all you're gonna do is be negative.
|
|
China Claus
Main Eventer
I can feeel your sensitivity
Joined on: Apr 17, 2012 20:05:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,737
|
Post by China Claus on Oct 23, 2013 12:48:56 GMT -5
September 2015? That's 2 years away! Who knows if TNA will even be around by then..... Just get out of here if all you're gonna do is be negative. In what way was I negative?.....All I was saying is September 2015 is a long time away. If anything, I'm being realistic.
|
|
|
Post by Punk on Oct 23, 2013 12:58:49 GMT -5
September 2015? That's 2 years away! Who knows if TNA will even be around by then..... They will. But yes, 2015, lolololol.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 23, 2013 13:00:48 GMT -5
TNA using the 6 sided ring did make the company look unique, but I also think it took away the feeling that it was a wrestling federation.
If TNA wants to strictly just worry about TNA and compete with itself - in that making it become better - than yes, go back to the 6 sides.
If they think they can truly compete with the WWE or at least have that mind set, they need the normal 4 sided ring.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Oct 23, 2013 13:03:02 GMT -5
They had the same seating chart when they had a show there a few years ago, if I remember correctly.
Spent 3 days putting up posters all around Kansas City, MO and Kansas City, KS to promote, got free tickets to the show from TNA for promoting, and it was an awful show.
Both Kurt Angle and AJ Styles were advertised, and Samoa Joe and Abyss and Jeff Jarrett and Mr. Anderson is who we go. I also got my first glimpse at the "Be the loudest fan and get tickets backstage" aka "Do you have breasts? Here's tickets backstage" system.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Oct 23, 2013 13:19:38 GMT -5
It isn't going to help their financial problems either way.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 13:25:16 GMT -5
Just get out of here if all you're gonna do is be negative. In what way was I negative?.....All I was saying is September 2015 is a long time away. If anything, I'm being realistic. You're saying TNA doesn't have what it takes to stay alive for another two years.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 13:26:02 GMT -5
TNA using the 6 sided ring did make the company look unique, but I also think it took away the feeling that it was a wrestling federation. If TNA wants to strictly just worry about TNA and compete with itself - in that making it become better - than yes, go back to the 6 sides. If they think they can truly compete with the WWE or at least have that mind set, they need the normal 4 sided ring. They're not trying to compete with WWE. Hogan and Bischoff made them try that once... Failed.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 13:28:08 GMT -5
It isn't going to help their financial problems either way. What's your point? This thread has nothing to do with their financial situation. Go to a different thread if that's what you want to discuss.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Oct 23, 2013 13:30:57 GMT -5
It isn't going to help their financial problems either way. What's your point? This thread has nothing to do with their financial situation. Go to a different thread if that's what you want to discuss. It was a joke. Are you just making this thread to argue with other members? Don't be angry with all of us, jees.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 13:34:34 GMT -5
What's your point? This thread has nothing to do with their financial situation. Go to a different thread if that's what you want to discuss. It was a joke. Don't be angry with all of us, jees. I'm sorry, but everywhere I go, all I hear is "TNA's going out of business" and "TNA doesn't have money" and "TNA doesn't sell tickets" and I'm really sick of it. If people don't want to just talk TNA, then don't. Also, everyone who says bad things about TNA can't back anything they say up. Why do people think TNA's going out of business? Because they're losing money? Who cares, Dixie's daddy is funding it. TNA DOES have money. And everybody keeps saying because they didn't sell out BFG that they suck, and people keep comparing it to WWE and they're two different things completely.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Oct 23, 2013 13:37:47 GMT -5
It was a joke. Don't be angry with all of us, jees. I'm sorry, but everywhere I go, all I hear is "TNA's going out of business" and "TNA doesn't have money" and "TNA doesn't sell tickets" and I'm really sick of it. If people don't want to just talk TNA, then don't. Also, everyone who says bad things about TNA can't back anything they say up. Why do people think TNA's going out of business? Because they're losing money? Who cares, Dixie's daddy is funding it. TNA DOES have money. And everybody keeps saying because they didn't sell out BFG that they suck, and people keep comparing it to WWE and they're two different things completely. I didn't say they were going out of business. I just simply said it wouldn't help their financial issues.
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 23, 2013 13:38:27 GMT -5
TNA has the better wrestling shows and pay per views, hands down.
I know hardcore WWE fans will say "but WWE has CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, and The Shield!!"
Who cares??
TNA has Austin Aries, AJ Styles, James Storm, Bobby Roode, Samoa Joe, Kazarian, Christopher Daniels, Chris Sabin, and a former WWE star who I never thought would be a great singles star in Bully Ray.
TNA over WWE, hands down.
Does TNA have financial problems?? Sure. But so did WWE, look back to 1995.
As long as TNA has Spike TV they will be fine.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Oct 23, 2013 13:41:14 GMT -5
TNA at this point is no more or no less the Arena Football League to the WWE's National Football League. It's stable enough to carry on and retain what fanbase it does have. There's some cities that LOVE their AFL team and are die hard fans. Likewise, there are people who only prefer TNA because it's a different format of the same "sport" or think it's on par.
I think some people get frustrated with TNA, because at times it has the potential to be really good and live up the hype and even bring back some of us that watched it in the past or bring on new viewers that have never seen it. But a majority of the time, it doesn't live up to the hype.
A little of this frustration also has to be placed on TNA's shoulders. They are the ones that made the comparison between themselves and WWE. They are the ones that said we can go head to head. They are the ones who have taken "cheap shots" in promos from previously employed WWE superstars. So it's not like disgruntled or uneducated fans are the ones that started comparing.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Oct 23, 2013 13:47:02 GMT -5
TNA has the better wrestling shows and pay per views, hands down. I know hardcore WWE fans will say "but WWE has CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, and The Shield!!" Who cares?? TNA has Austin Aries, AJ Styles, James Storm, Bobby Roode, Samoa Joe, Kazarian, Christopher Daniels, Chris Sabin, and a former WWE star who I never thought would be a great singles star in Bully Ray. TNA over WWE, hands down. Does TNA have financial problems?? Sure. But so did WWE, look back to 1995. As long as TNA has Spike TV they will be fine. Exactly.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Oct 23, 2013 14:01:47 GMT -5
Holy crap when I first saw this I was in shock thinking that they booked a show a year in advance. Now I realized it's ing TWO years away. Who's the clown that is booking shows two years in advance? TNA does some ridiculous stuff business wise but this is at the top of the list.
|
|