|
Post by IRS on Sept 30, 2014 14:12:14 GMT -5
"As of today, the plan is for either John Cena or Dean Ambrose to face Seth Rollins inside the Cell at WWE's Hell In a Cell pay-per-view in October.
The plan is for Cena and Ambrose to face each other on an upcoming RAW, either the week before or two weeks before the pay-per-view, with the winner facing Rollins in the Cell.
The loser may face Randy Orton at the pay-per-view or may be the "keeper of the key" outside of the Cell match."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- UPDATE:
"We noted before that there was talk of doing John Cena vs. Dean Ambrose on an upcoming RAW with the winner facing Seth Rollins in a Cell match at WWE Hell In a Cell. The loser would then face Randy Orton at the pay-per-view.
The Wrestling Observer Newsletter reports that the current plan is for Hell In a Cell to start with Cena vs. Ambrose. The winner of that would main event the show with Rollins in the Cell and the loser would face Orton, also in the Cell."
Source: Lords of Pain
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 19:43:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 14:14:57 GMT -5
Shouldn't Cena be pissed at Lesnar still? Leave Rollins and Ambrose alone!
Normally, I'm not one to believe the dirtsheets, but the writing on the wall seems to be there.
|
|
|
Post by TurboEddie on Sept 30, 2014 14:19:06 GMT -5
I like the idea, but Dean Ambrose would have to win.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Sept 30, 2014 14:31:09 GMT -5
I like the idea, but Dean Ambrose would have to win. So not happening lol, if anything I see an Ambrose heel turn coming up to let Cena go over 2 bad guys in one night.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 30, 2014 14:46:21 GMT -5
This is dumb.
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Sept 30, 2014 15:05:32 GMT -5
So help me if the Rollins/Ambrose feud is ruined because Cena doesn't have anyone to face. Why not open up the pocketbook to get Brock back for HitC? I'd MUCH rather have Rollin/Ambrose and Lesnar/Cena have their own Hell in a Cell matches.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Sept 30, 2014 15:07:41 GMT -5
What the . What does Cena have to do with this feud? This is Dean's feud and has been for the last several months. Cena has NOTHING to do with it. Wish he would just off for once. This is why i cant stand WWE anymore.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Sept 30, 2014 15:10:58 GMT -5
I like the idea, but Dean Ambrose would have to win. So not happening lol, if anything I see an Ambrose heel turn coming up to let Cena go over 2 bad guys in one night. Exactly. There is extreme value with Dean Ambrose as a babyface. I wouldn't be surprised if they turned Ambrose heel just to feed to Cena. They don't care about long term value anymore with building stars. This is why I hate the John Cena character that wwe has created. Its such an ugly monster to the IWC. it's killed some of our favorites.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Sept 30, 2014 15:12:51 GMT -5
Didn't WWE expand Brock's contract so he could work HIAC?
If Cena faces Rollins, I'm unsubscribing from the network. This is this first feud I've been excited for since Punk v. Cena. John has nothing to do with Seth and Dean's feud.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Sept 30, 2014 15:14:28 GMT -5
You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,249
|
Post by hbkowns on Sept 30, 2014 15:19:13 GMT -5
You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. Classic wwe logic
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Sept 30, 2014 15:24:01 GMT -5
So help me if the Rollins/Ambrose feud is ruined because Cena doesn't have anyone to face. Why not open up the pocketbook to get Brock back for HitC? I'd MUCH rather have Rollin/Ambrose and Lesnar/Cena have their own Hell in a Cell matches. It isn't as easy as it seems. The WWE is saving money but not having Brock Lesnar there. It helps the WWE's bottom line but showcasing to of your new main eventers in Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins. I'd say, let both Rollins & Ambrose headline Hell In a Cell in the cell and test them to see how they fair well under that pressure. The network has changed how they plan PPV's now.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 19:43:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 15:28:19 GMT -5
Shouldn't Cena be pissed at Lesnar still? I think I'd be more pissed at the guy who prevented me from getting my title back than I would be at the guy I clearly had beat until the first guy ran down trying to be a dickhead. You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. Classic modern wwe logic Fixed.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Sept 30, 2014 15:33:54 GMT -5
If this happens, I don't see it ending well for Ambrose, Rollins, or the fans. They couldn't just keep Cena's nose out of one good thing, could they?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 19:43:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 15:35:36 GMT -5
If this happens, I don't see it ending well for Ambrose, Rollins, or the fans. They couldn't just keep Cena's nose out of one good thing, could they? There's totally no chance he loses to Ambrose via some sort of crap from the Authority and has to contend with Orton, right?
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Sept 30, 2014 15:41:40 GMT -5
So help me if the Rollins/Ambrose feud is ruined because Cena doesn't have anyone to face. Why not open up the pocketbook to get Brock back for HitC? I'd MUCH rather have Rollin/Ambrose and Lesnar/Cena have their own Hell in a Cell matches. It isn't as easy as it seems. The WWE is saving money but not having Brock Lesnar there. It helps the WWE's bottom line but showcasing to of your new main eventers in Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins. I'd say, let both Rollins & Ambrose headline Hell In a Cell in the cell and test them to see how they fair well under that pressure. The network has changed how they plan PPV's now. I understand WHY they injected Cena into the feud, but I'm still upset by it. His inclusion is taking away from the build up of Ambrose/Rollins. I agree, they should be the main event of the PPV. If it takes having to watch Orton/Cena 20, then so be it.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Sept 30, 2014 15:44:43 GMT -5
If this happens, I don't see it ending well for Ambrose, Rollins, or the fans. They couldn't just keep Cena's nose out of one good thing, could they? There's totally no chance he loses to Ambrose via some sort of crap from the Authority and has to contend with Orton, right? I'm not saying that's not possible, but how would it make any sense? The Authority has been trying to keep Ambrose away from Rollins for a while...why would they suddenly want to lock him in a HIAC with him by screwing over Cena?
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Sept 30, 2014 15:51:44 GMT -5
You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. But we've had TWO ppv pull apart brawls we should feel satisfied
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Sept 30, 2014 15:53:00 GMT -5
You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. Vince didn't get the memo. #OutofTouchPainInTheAssWWELogic If Cena goes over both Ambrose and Rollins, it may be the worst booking decision since SummerSlam 2010.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 19:43:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 15:56:03 GMT -5
There's totally no chance he loses to Ambrose via some sort of crap from the Authority and has to contend with Orton, right? I'm not saying that's not possible, but how would it make any sense? The Authority has been trying to keep Ambrose away from Rollins for a while...why would they suddenly want to lock him in a HIAC with him by screwing over Cena? Isn't it rumored Orton's going babyface? Maybe he does some crap to give Ambrose the shot at Rollins that they've been staving off.
|
|