|
Post by Planktung on Nov 30, 2014 20:05:52 GMT -5
If he just went "I hate Triple H, Ryback, Vince McMahon is delusional, blah blah blah" then maybe so. I could see it being viable, even if unlikely. However, do you really think WWE would have a superstar say he was fired on his wedding day and completely tear apart their wellness policy while they have ongoing litigation concerning concussions and stockholder pressure? Absolutely not. As for the no money thing, its pretty clear Punk doesn't care about the money. He did it for free because he wanted a place he felt comfortable doing it and with his best friend is definitely that kind of place. The biggest red flag here is AJ. Women handle things on a different level from men. AJ stayed with a company that treated her then fiancee like this? She then continued to stay with a company that fired her fiancee on his wedding day? She stayed with that same company even though they( apparently) passed his firing off as a walk out? Yet after all that, she stayed with that company. He didn't give her hell and convince her to leave? Thats the bind here in the story. Stop trying to formulate reasons for why this could be a work. It's not.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Nov 30, 2014 20:11:17 GMT -5
There is no reality era. It's something internet smarks coaxed up to try to convince themselves WWE had some idea of what they were doing creatively. Did you need convincing that Chris Benoit killed his family, too? Be honest. Take away the names of this and insert your own and tell me that this wouldn't make for an awesome storyline. Doesn't the fact that it would be an awesome storyline prove that the WWE wouldn't do it? The WWE is getting a crapload of bad press from this... Why would they do that to themselves after everything else that's gone wrong so far this year?
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Nov 30, 2014 20:14:56 GMT -5
The biggest red flag here is AJ. Women handle things on a different level from men. AJ stayed with a company that treated her then fiancee like this? She then continued to stay with a company that fired her fiancee on his wedding day? She stayed with that same company even though they( apparently) passed his firing off as a walk out? Yet after all that, she stayed with that company. He didn't give her hell and convince her to leave? Thats the bind here in the story. Stop trying to formulate reasons for why this could be a work. It's not. I'm not formulating. It was just a idea I had, and I'm simply asking if anyone felt the same way. It is a forum...
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Nov 30, 2014 20:15:42 GMT -5
There is absolutely no way. It would be absolutely amazing but not in this world.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Nov 30, 2014 20:15:46 GMT -5
Be honest. Take away the names of this and insert your own and tell me that this wouldn't make for an awesome storyline. Doesn't the fact that it would be an awesome storyline prove that the WWE wouldn't do it? The WWE is getting a crapload of bad press from this... Why would they do that to themselves after everything else that's gone wrong so far this year? Hahaha true. But hey, The Bryan-Authority storyline was good.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Nov 30, 2014 20:32:31 GMT -5
If he just went "I hate Triple H, Ryback, Vince McMahon is delusional, blah blah blah" then maybe so. I could see it being viable, even if unlikely. However, do you really think WWE would have a superstar say he was fired on his wedding day and completely tear apart their wellness policy while they have ongoing litigation concerning concussions and stockholder pressure? Absolutely not. As for the no money thing, its pretty clear Punk doesn't care about the money. He did it for free because he wanted a place he felt comfortable doing it and with his best friend is definitely that kind of place. The biggest red flag here is AJ. Women handle things on a different level from men. AJ stayed with a company that treated her then fiancee like this? She then continued to stay with a company that fired her fiancee on his wedding day? She stayed with that same company even though they( apparently) passed his firing off as a walk out? Yet after all that, she stayed with that company. He didn't give her hell and convince her to leave? Thats the bind here in the story. What the hell is this supposed to mean? Jesus Christ.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 8:35:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 20:37:06 GMT -5
Oh my God...
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Nov 30, 2014 20:38:28 GMT -5
The biggest red flag here is AJ. Women handle things on a different level from men. AJ stayed with a company that treated her then fiancee like this? She then continued to stay with a company that fired her fiancee on his wedding day? She stayed with that same company even though they( apparently) passed his firing off as a walk out? Yet after all that, she stayed with that company. He didn't give her hell and convince her to leave? Thats the bind here in the story. What the hell is this supposed to mean? Jesus Christ. Hahaha Women tend to take things to the extreme when things happen to their "man". My wife does.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Nov 30, 2014 20:41:00 GMT -5
What the hell is this supposed to mean? Jesus Christ. Hahaha Women tend to take things to the extreme when things happen to their "man". My wife does. Wow, is this sexism and oversimplification.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Nov 30, 2014 20:48:08 GMT -5
Hahaha Women tend to take things to the extreme when things happen to their "man". My wife does. Wow, is this sexism and oversimplification. Dude, you can take offended self and comments somewhere else. I posted this as a fun idea I had.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Nov 30, 2014 20:48:17 GMT -5
Hahaha This is why I hesitated to share this idea. I knew I would catch hell for it. If you stand back, with an unbiased opinion, it kind of does make sence. No, no it does not.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Nov 30, 2014 20:54:31 GMT -5
Wow, is this sexism and oversimplification. Dude, you can take offended self and comments somewhere else. I posted this as a fun idea I had.
|
|
|
Post by Charabro on Nov 30, 2014 21:01:24 GMT -5
This forum I swear.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 8:35:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 21:53:27 GMT -5
Lol no
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Nov 30, 2014 21:56:49 GMT -5
It's more possible than Owen, Savage and Guerrero being surprise entrants in the Rumble. But only slightly more possible.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Nov 30, 2014 21:58:17 GMT -5
Nah, he's done.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Nov 30, 2014 22:26:07 GMT -5
Hahaha This is why I hesitated to share this idea. I knew I would catch hell for it. If you stand back, with an unbiased opinion, it kind of does make sence. Punk releases his interview right before Austin's live Network Podcast... If anything, I'm excited to see what is said on Austin's show. You have to follow up with this. Austin won't bring it up, I can guarantee you that. McMahon is airing this on the network, he definitely picked/approved the questions beforehand. This will be happy go lucky, talk about the AE times and say nothing about this whole situation.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 8:35:38 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2014 22:34:54 GMT -5
I thought it was a storyline but figured out it wasn't when he didn't show at WM.
|
|
China Claus
Main Eventer
I can feeel your sensitivity
Joined on: Apr 17, 2012 20:05:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,737
|
Post by China Claus on Nov 30, 2014 22:37:19 GMT -5
It's still real to me, dammit!
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Nov 30, 2014 23:43:54 GMT -5
Trust me, a lot of people, myself included, wish it was. But I think it's safe to say Punk is done with WWE and they with him. This
|
|