|
|
Post by Sizzle on Feb 10, 2015 19:02:40 GMT -5
Bryan can run circles around Lesnar and stay in the fight, Lesnar would get tired faster.
It's what you'd expect with an underdog fighting a beast. Or a David facing a Goliath.
|
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Feb 10, 2015 19:44:08 GMT -5
Yeah he beats the guy who beat the streak, destroyed Cena and has been build as an unbeatable beast...Who just happens to have been a UFC world champion. And does it cleanly all while being out with an injury for almost a year. That makes Bryan unbeatable then and his whole appeal is the underdog.
I'm sorry but Brock is the one opponent the "face" underdog winning cleanly won't work with because he is then no longer the underdog in his matches. He's then expected to win every match he's in.
Even if he is in the main event against Brock he should not beat Brock cleanly for the title. If he faces Brock 1 on 1 he should lose to Brock but show his never give up heart in a 30-45 minute match.
Then have Seth cash in is MIB contract on an exhausted Brock.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim of thee on Feb 11, 2015 0:19:18 GMT -5
Yeah he beats the guy who beat the streak, destroyed Cena and has been build as an unbeatable beast...Who just happens to have been a UFC world champion. And does it cleanly all while being out with an injury for almost a year. That makes Bryan unbeatable then and his whole appeal is the underdog. I'm sorry but Brock is the one opponent the "face" underdog winning cleanly won't work with because he is then no longer the underdog in his matches. He's then expected to win every match he's in. Even if he is in the main event against Brock he should not beat Brock cleanly for the title. If he faces Brock 1 on 1 he should lose to Brock but show his never give up heart in a 30-45 minute match. Then have Seth cash in is MIB contract on an exhausted Brock. I completely agree! I think the right way, cleanly and characteristically, would be Bryan outlasting Lesnar |
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Feb 11, 2015 0:51:34 GMT -5
The believability argument is silly to me. Building the match up as David vs Goliath and working the match correctly could make the finish believable, and it's something that has happened many times in wrestling before.
But to answer the question, yes he is. Crowds love him, and it's more than the yes chant. They cheer everything he does, go nuts when he he wins, and get mad when he loses. How much more over can you get?
|
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544 
|
Post by Starscream on Feb 11, 2015 0:53:32 GMT -5
Bryan vs Lesnar would be superb, a dream match for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulk Who? on Feb 11, 2015 3:08:48 GMT -5
|
|
JuiceWinslow
Main Eventer
Flair Country
Joined on: Sept 9, 2012 17:32:08 GMT -5
Posts: 2,706
|
Post by JuiceWinslow on Feb 11, 2015 4:13:24 GMT -5
I think the d-bry fans are missing a point. . . Lesnar DESIMATED cena who is todays hogan! The way he brutalised 'super cena' aswell as defeating the streak with the 21-0 undertaker. There's no way! D-bry's ring skills can match brocks brutality. The wwe machine is now pushing reigns, why call it a 'superman punch' if they're not after him being the next beasty guy. Brocks a spectacle above others, always has been, agility and brtue strength. They're trying to build up reigns with this move and the d-bry obsession needs to go towards another goal for the guy AT THE MOMENT. Let me refresh your memory right quick. Daniel Bryan defeated John Cena clean. Daniel Bryan defeated Randy Orton, Batista, and Triple H in one night at WrestleMania. There is no reason to doubt him, in all honestly. He is the master of submissions moves.. he can be as brutal and hard hitting as anyone in WWE. There is no one better to match up with Brck Lesnar than Daniel Bryan. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 20:46:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2015 5:09:23 GMT -5
I think the d-bry fans are missing a point. . . Lesnar DESIMATED cena who is todays hogan! The way he brutalised 'super cena' aswell as defeating the streak with the 21-0 undertaker. There's no way! D-bry's ring skills can match brocks brutality. The wwe machine is now pushing reigns, why call it a 'superman punch' if they're not after him being the next beasty guy. Brocks a spectacle above others, always has been, agility and brtue strength. They're trying to build up reigns with this move and the d-bry obsession needs to go towards another goal for the guy AT THE MOMENT. Let me refresh your memory right quick. Daniel Bryan defeated John Cena clean. Daniel Bryan defeated Randy Orton, Batista, and Triple H in one night at WrestleMania. There is no reason to doubt him, in all honestly. He is the master of submissions moves.. he can be as brutal and hard hitting as anyone in WWE. There is no one better to match up with Brck Lesnar than Daniel Bryan. Well put there Juice!! |
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Feb 12, 2015 19:48:33 GMT -5
Bryan vs Lesnar would be a classic, I hope we get that match one day. Also Bryan has been the most over guy on the roster for like 2-3 years now.
|
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Feb 12, 2015 19:58:43 GMT -5
Bryan isn't as over as we think? Lmao
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Feb 12, 2015 21:14:00 GMT -5
Bryan beating Brock is also much more believable, because his moveset could be used to weaken and tear apart Brock Lesnar, which is the only way to beat Brock. Roman would have to just beat on Brock with a chair for 30 minutes because he doesn't have a believable moveset.
|
|
|
|
Post by WalterF on Feb 12, 2015 21:36:53 GMT -5
At first it may seem a stretch but there are alot of cool creative ways u can build a match. U can have d bry kind if skirt around lesnar, avoiding conflict and trauma.
At some point he could tear into a limb of Lesnar and then take out a leg, leaving Brock to wrestle mostly on a limp, levelling out the playing field.
And besides all of that, D Bry is massively over....simply a proven fact. The more WWE tries to deny it, the more messy backpeddlkng they will have to do to remedy it
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Feb 13, 2015 14:21:50 GMT -5
Bryan beating Brock is also much more believable, because his moveset could be used to weaken and tear apart Brock Lesnar, which is the only way to beat Brock. Roman would have to just beat on Brock with a chair for 30 minutes because he doesn't have a believable moveset. WWE has conditioned fans into thinking irresistible force vs immovable object is a real thing and it's because that's the circus spectacle of pro wrestling. However, that's not really how it works anymore, and definitely in real life fights it doesn't just automatically go to the big guy, it goes to the skilled guy. That, to me, is where WWE kind of lags. Last year was a huge step in that direction, ditto for Punk as champion, but people have this perception that muscles or stature mean you're tough and that's not usually the case 9/10. Bryan's good for wrestling in that regard. He's breaking barriers that are going to mean a ton to guys 10 years down the road imo. |
|
| NLS™ |
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Buy My Figures!
Joined on: Jun 7, 2012 3:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,538
|
Post by | NLS™ | on Feb 13, 2015 14:42:28 GMT -5
Why oh why do people care about believability? Yeah I agree, that's really stupid! 
Believability is not important at all... the REAL Main Event should be the Brock Lesnar defending the World Title against Dink the Clown! From there Dink can overcome insurmountable odds in an epic battle and overcomes Brock Lesnar to establish himself as the Greatest Underdog Victor in WrestleMania History!
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Feb 13, 2015 14:51:34 GMT -5
Why oh why do people care about believability? Yeah I agree, that's really stupid!
Believability is not important at all... the REAL Main Event should be the Brock Lesnar defending the World Title against Dink the Clown! From there Dink can overcome insurmountable odds in an epic battle and overcomes Brock Lesnar to establish himself as the Greatest Underdog Victor in WrestleMania History!
Obviously there are limits. The best technical wrestler in the WWE should be believable enough. But with the way Lesnar has been booked, no one is believable. Who exactly is believable enough to you? |
|
futureisrollins
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Dec 29, 2014 23:02:17 GMT -5
Posts: 239
|
Post by futureisrollins on Feb 13, 2015 15:03:25 GMT -5
Why oh why do people care about believability? Yeah I agree, that's really stupid!
Believability is not important at all... the REAL Main Event should be the Brock Lesnar defending the World Title against Dink the Clown! From there Dink can overcome insurmountable odds in an epic battle and overcomes Brock Lesnar to establish himself as the Greatest Underdog Victor in WrestleMania History!
Don't turn this into a tale of the tape. It's all about storyline and anything is believable if the WWE makes it out to be within their writing and booking. Dbry took out HHH, Orton, and Batista in one night and others before. No one is a legit threat to lesnar at this point so, it's either keep him as champion which wouldn't make sense, or build someone up. Bryan is already a step ahead. |
|
| NLS™ |
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Buy My Figures!
Joined on: Jun 7, 2012 3:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,538
|
Post by | NLS™ | on Feb 13, 2015 18:34:37 GMT -5
Yeah I agree, that's really stupid!
Believability is not important at all... the REAL Main Event should be the Brock Lesnar defending the World Title against Dink the Clown! From there Dink can overcome insurmountable odds in an epic battle and overcomes Brock Lesnar to establish himself as the Greatest Underdog Victor in WrestleMania History!
Obviously there are limits. The best technical wrestler in the WWE should be believable enough. But with the way Lesnar has been booked, no one is believable. Who exactly is believable enough to you? Roman Reigns. But I was making just making a point that believability does matter. It should matter... to some extent, especially when it comes to the World Title. How come everybody cared about it when a guy like Vince Russo or Vince McMahon won the World Title? But now it's okay for a guy that everybody knows couldn't truly beat Brock on his best and Brock's worst day? Wrestling fans are hypocrites. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 20:46:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 18:41:50 GMT -5
Obviously there are limits. The best technical wrestler in the WWE should be believable enough. But with the way Lesnar has been booked, no one is believable. Who exactly is believable enough to you? Roman Reigns. But I was making just making a point that believability does matter. It should matter... to some extent, especially when it comes to the World Title. How come everybody cared about it when a guy like Vince Russo or Vince McMahon won the World Title? But now it's okay for a guy that everybody knows couldn't truly beat Brock on his best and Brock's worst day? Wrestling fans are hypocrites. What is this? I don't even. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 20:46:36 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2015 18:52:01 GMT -5
Roman Reigns. But I was making just making a point that believability does matter. It should matter... to some extent, especially when it comes to the World Title. How come everybody cared about it when a guy like Vince Russo or Vince McMahon won the World Title? But now it's okay for a guy that everybody knows couldn't truly beat Brock on his best and Brock's worst day? Wrestling fans are hypocrites. What is this? I don't even. Its best just to ignore it man. Since an argument is only a few posts away due to the nature of some posts made? its time to lock this one up. |
|
