|
Post by bad guy™ on Dec 21, 2015 0:14:50 GMT -5
Welp, here we are ladies and gentlemen. One week into the Roman Empire and we have yet to be oppressed. Good signs. Here's hoping for another good RAW like last week. Woo~!
|
|
|
Post by c-scope on Dec 21, 2015 0:16:31 GMT -5
Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Please!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 0:19:25 GMT -5
Future is bright. Believe that.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Dec 21, 2015 0:22:35 GMT -5
Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Good raw! Please! If it's like last week's I think we're ok.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Dec 21, 2015 1:28:25 GMT -5
I really hope they don't waste a Rollins return on the slammys
|
|
|
Post by A-Rob on Dec 21, 2015 2:41:26 GMT -5
The Roman Regins Era continues to roll on.
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Dec 21, 2015 2:45:09 GMT -5
The Roman Regins Era continues to roll on. You bet.
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Dec 21, 2015 2:50:05 GMT -5
The real question is: what pun will Roman('s writers) think up for his opponents' testicles this week?!
In all seriousness, hopefully they can actually stitch together another good show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 2:52:59 GMT -5
This is gonna SUCCKKKKK.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 21, 2015 8:33:12 GMT -5
IT'S THE SLAMMYS
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 8:52:44 GMT -5
Tonight is the night
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 9:06:23 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 9:24:11 GMT -5
I really hope they don't waste a Rollins return on the slammys I actually hope not, either. As much as I'd LOVE to see him back, it's way too soon right now.
|
|
|
Post by Daws on Dec 21, 2015 11:13:53 GMT -5
I love the slammys!
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 21, 2015 11:29:50 GMT -5
Tonight, and every night for the foreseeable future, will be interesting because they're literally one small step away from unraveling everything positive they've done with Roman in the past week or so. There's a car crash waiting to happen, the fun part is watching whether or not WWE cuts the wheel in time to miss it.
I would wager tonight is the biggest night of Roman's career, truthfully. He got over with the help of the three most over heels in the business. Now he's got to stand on his own and go back to, presumably, working with Sheamus by himself. Sink or swim.
|
|
|
Post by TheSystem 1.5 on Dec 21, 2015 11:36:47 GMT -5
I bet some flipping vanilla midget will win. Who cares anyway, it's the ing slammies. Why is Batista with the "Then" section of your sig?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 11:41:13 GMT -5
I bet some flipping vanilla midget will win. Who cares anyway, it's the ing slammies. Why is Batista with the "Then" section of your sig? Batista debuted in 2002. Kane returned in 2002. HHH returned it 2002. Austin was there in 2002. That's why.
|
|
|
Post by TheSystem 1.5 on Dec 21, 2015 11:43:35 GMT -5
Why is Batista with the "Then" section of your sig? Batista debuted in 2002. Kane returned in 2002. HHH returned it 2002. Austin was there in 2002. That's why. That doesnt make sense though. Cena debuted around the same and you have him in the "Now" section. Plus Austin's been around since the late 80s, Kane and HHH early 90s (maybe late 80s for Kane.), and Rock the mid 90s. They all represent The Attitude Era. Batista is from The Same Era as Cena which would make him a "Now" wrestler.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 11:45:51 GMT -5
I think the Wyatts are going to feud with the LON and tease a face run.
Why wouldn't Bray be a face? If he's likable, more people would want to join him! lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 22, 2024 6:39:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 21, 2015 11:51:23 GMT -5
Batista debuted in 2002. Kane returned in 2002. HHH returned it 2002. Austin was there in 2002. That's why. That doesnt make sense though. Cena debuted around the same and you have him in the "Now" section. Plus Austin's been around since the late 80s, Kane and HHH early 90s (maybe late 80s for Kane.), and Rock the mid 90s. They all represent The Attitude Era. Batista is from The Same Era as Cena which would make him a "Now" wrestler. 2000 to 2003 was my favourite era, so I guess it represents that more. It's not even my picture so I guess you're right.
|
|