|
Post by stratusfaction2 on May 26, 2008 12:10:26 GMT -5
Which Diva's who have never held the WWE Women's Championship in the past deserve to hold it someday in the future.
I think -Jillian -Katie Lea -Cherry -Michelle McCool -Natalya
A lot of people think Cherry is inexperienced and stuff but thats just her gimmick. Search Kara Slice VS April Hunter in YouTube and you can see what shes all about.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 4, 2024 6:01:53 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2008 12:13:16 GMT -5
Natalya definately goes without saying. Jillian and Katie I Agree with. Not so much Michelle yet
|
|
|
Post by jorge4903 on May 26, 2008 12:28:48 GMT -5
I'd go for everybody on that list except for cherry and mccool.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on May 26, 2008 12:35:54 GMT -5
All of them seem too new to the WWE to "deserve" the hold the Women's Championship.
I really can't think of anyone who never held and it deserved to, to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by TotalDivaCustoms on May 26, 2008 13:04:51 GMT -5
Michelle McCool doesn't deserved to be champion...
But these divas should Jillian Katie Natalya
|
|
|
Post by vandutch on May 26, 2008 13:40:23 GMT -5
Which Diva's who have never held the WWE Women's Championship in the past deserve to hold it someday in the future. I think -Jillian -Katie Lea -Cherry -Michelle McCool -Natalya A lot of people think Cherry is inexperienced and stuff but thats just her gimmick. Search Kara Slice VS April Hunter in YouTube and you can see what shes all about. I don't think anyone on your list "deserves" the championship at this point. Cherry, Natalya, and Katie Lea have only been actually wrestling for WWE for about a month. That Jillian (what has she done to prove she is championship material) and Michelle (huge push but I don't feel she's an established woman's wrestler at this point) now, you also mention "in the future" in your post. I'm not sure what that changes since none of us know what these divas will do in the wwe in the future. to change things up a little and say who deserves to hold the title again for past accomplishments, I would vote for Victoria. She has proven that she's a legitimate wrestler/diva and has stuck around WWE for years...I would imagine she is possibly the longest serving diva on the roster??? is that correct?
|
|
|
Post by Groundswell on May 26, 2008 18:15:41 GMT -5
Natalya, Katie and Jillian.
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on May 26, 2008 19:39:44 GMT -5
I really can't think of anyone who never held and it deserved to, to be honest. Green Goddess FTW.
|
|
|
Post by scottsteiner on May 26, 2008 19:40:41 GMT -5
Natalya and Katie will hold it some day fo' sho'.
|
|
B-Radimus Prime
Main Eventer
R.I.P. Luna :(
Joined on: Jun 20, 2006 21:37:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,572
|
Post by B-Radimus Prime on May 26, 2008 19:59:27 GMT -5
First and foremost, Luna Vachon. She should have held the belt at some point in her WWF Career. I mean, she put over that talentless piece of trash Sable like no other. Whoever would choose Michelle, Cherry, Maria or someone else of that nature to hold it over the greatly talented Luna, has no idea what they're talking about.
Also, Tori. She was so talented and she rarely got to showcase it. Her alleyoop was awesome. I thought she would've came back and had some amazing matches with Molly Holly during the whole Ninja gimmick thing.
I don't think any other woman really comes to mind. Aside from Terri Runnells. I mean, she wasn't very good in the ring or anything...but the WWE has a tendancy to give the belt to women with no talent.
Jillian should definitely be a future Women's Champion. She's one of the best in the ring and she has/had a great gimmick that fits her well.
|
|
Ratedwwe
Main Eventer
WF Divas group member
Joined on: Jul 8, 2007 18:17:49 GMT -5
Posts: 3,105
|
Post by Ratedwwe on May 26, 2008 20:00:27 GMT -5
Katie Lea
|
|
|
Post by †hê Jå§ðñ Wïllïåm§ on May 26, 2008 21:00:09 GMT -5
Person who came to mind, Torrie Wilson.
|
|
acr93
Main Eventer
WF's #1 Widow's Peak Freak!
Joined on: Aug 7, 2007 16:03:51 GMT -5
Posts: 2,110
|
Post by acr93 on May 26, 2008 22:07:35 GMT -5
First and foremost, Luna Vachon. She should have held the belt at some point in her WWF Career. I mean, she put over that talentless piece of trash Sable like no other. Whoever would choose Michelle, Cherry, Maria or someone else of that nature to hold it over the greatly talented Luna, has no idea what they're talking about. Also, Tori. She was so talented and she rarely got to showcase it. Her alleyoop was awesome. I thought she would've came back and had some amazing matches with Molly Holly during the whole Ninja gimmick thing. I don't think any other woman really comes to mind. Aside from Terri Runnells. I mean, she wasn't very good in the ring or anything...but the WWE has a tendancy to give the belt to women with no talent. Jillian should definitely be a future Women's Champion. She's one of the best in the ring and she has/had a great gimmick that fits her well. I totally agree about Luna. She was one of the best if not the best during her time in the WWF. Also, Tori was the masked ninja lady that always came out and beat on Molly? I've always wondered who that was. BTW, why did they drop the gimmick?
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on May 26, 2008 22:13:21 GMT -5
First and foremost, Luna Vachon. She should have held the belt at some point in her WWF Career. I mean, she put over that talentless piece of trash Sable like no other. Whoever would choose Michelle, Cherry, Maria or someone else of that nature to hold it over the greatly talented Luna, has no idea what they're talking about. Also, Tori. She was so talented and she rarely got to showcase it. Her alleyoop was awesome. I thought she would've came back and had some amazing matches with Molly Holly during the whole Ninja gimmick thing. I don't think any other woman really comes to mind. Aside from Terri Runnells. I mean, she wasn't very good in the ring or anything...but the WWE has a tendancy to give the belt to women with no talent. Jillian should definitely be a future Women's Champion. She's one of the best in the ring and she has/had a great gimmick that fits her well. I totally agree about Luna. She was one of the best if not the best during her time in the WWF. Also, Tori was the masked ninja lady that always came out and beat on Molly? I've always wondered who that was. BTW, why did they drop the gimmick? Tori had to go be a Tough Enough trainer.
|
|
|
Post by mania on May 26, 2008 22:16:56 GMT -5
None of them.
|
|
|
Post by Edge618 on May 27, 2008 1:09:02 GMT -5
First and foremost, Luna Vachon. She should have held the belt at some point in her WWF Career. I mean, she put over that talentless piece of trash Sable like no other. Whoever would choose Michelle, Cherry, Maria or someone else of that nature to hold it over the greatly talented Luna, has no idea what they're talking about. Also, Tori. She was so talented and she rarely got to showcase it. Her alleyoop was awesome. I thought she would've came back and had some amazing matches with Molly Holly during the whole Ninja gimmick thing. I don't think any other woman really comes to mind. Aside from Terri Runnells. I mean, she wasn't very good in the ring or anything...but the WWE has a tendancy to give the belt to women with no talent. Jillian should definitely be a future Women's Champion. She's one of the best in the ring and she has/had a great gimmick that fits her well. I never knew that Luna was never a women's champion. She should have had it.
|
|
|
Post by Jord on May 27, 2008 1:14:03 GMT -5
Jillian Hall, Tori, and Katie Lea.
|
|
|
Post by Thick Justice on May 27, 2008 5:08:22 GMT -5
Jilian.
After she successfully defends have her sing I am the champion. It could get her some big heal heat.
Beulah McGuillicully. She is a good wrestler. Move Tommy Dreamer to Raw and give him a hardcore kicking ass and taking names attitude with her and have them make out all the time on screen. Have him face a lower card guy hit him with a DDT have him go outside and suck her tongue out and then go in and hit the dreamer driver. If she was champion and he would interfere causing her too win it would be awesome.
|
|
|
Post by JDSFullmetal on May 27, 2008 6:55:25 GMT -5
First and foremost, Luna Vachon. She should have held the belt at some point in her WWF Career. I mean, she put over that talentless piece of trash Sable like no other. Whoever would choose Michelle, Cherry, Maria or someone else of that nature to hold it over the greatly talented Luna, has no idea what they're talking about. Also, Tori. She was so talented and she rarely got to showcase it. Her alleyoop was awesome. I thought she would've came back and had some amazing matches with Molly Holly during the whole Ninja gimmick thing. I don't think any other woman really comes to mind. Aside from Terri Runnells. I mean, she wasn't very good in the ring or anything...but the WWE has a tendancy to give the belt to women with no talent. Jillian should definitely be a future Women's Champion. She's one of the best in the ring and she has/had a great gimmick that fits her well. I totally agree about Luna. She was one of the best if not the best during her time in the WWF. Also, Tori was the masked ninja lady that always came out and beat on Molly? I've always wondered who that was. BTW, why did they drop the gimmick? As dumb as it sounds wwe dropped the gimmick after tori was unmasked by molly holly on heat. After that she did TE1 and was asked to go down to OVW to "work on her ring work" and was let go after she told them she didn't want to go. BTW when i read the name of this topic tori's face poped right into my mind, sure tori never had a real gimmick besides her "I love sable" and "Raven's Ninja Girl" gimmicks but she was over as hell and maybe the best girl wrestler of the late 90's IMO. as for current divas i'd say Jillian, she has the ring skills and the gimmick to be a good champion(to bad the same can't be said for most champions in wwe right now) as for katie lea & natalya i don't think there ready to be champion just yet if they did win it really soon it could only be a bad thing(after all what else would they have to prove?)
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on May 27, 2008 10:45:52 GMT -5
big vis
|
|