Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 16:44:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2009 18:21:26 GMT -5
Here's what I think TNA needs to do in order to get higher ratings:
-Like someone said before, they need to advertise more.
-TNA needs to take advantage on WWE going PG. They need to go towards the 18-35 male demographic. It'll will get a lot more ratings, imo. The older group of WWE fans would turn to TNA and see the stuff they like, as oppose to the child appropriate stuff they see on WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jun 15, 2009 23:53:30 GMT -5
- The 6/11 edition of TNA Impact did a cable 1.1 rating. The replay did a 0.3 rating.
GERWECK
|
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Jun 16, 2009 13:31:00 GMT -5
TNA needs to hold on to a  in story line. Random stuff is starting to happen and its so stupid. I dont even know who's fueding with who. What happened to building story lines?! |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 16, 2009 14:27:25 GMT -5
TNA needs to hold on to a in story line. Random stuff is starting to happen and its so stupid. I dont even know who's fueding with who. What happened to building story lines?! Are you serious? Foley/Jarrett Joe/MEM 3D/BMI/BI Daniels/Douglas Tara/Love MCMG & LC vs. Suicide (unmasking him) and a little "sub-storyline" with EY turniing heel. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 16, 2009 16:24:21 GMT -5
TNA needs to hold on to a in story line. Random stuff is starting to happen and its so stupid. I dont even know who's fueding with who. What happened to building story lines?! Are you serious? Foley/Jarrett Joe/MEM 3D/BMI/BI Daniels/Douglas Tara/Love MCMG & LC vs. Suicide (unmasking him) and a little "sub-storyline" with EY turniing heel. agreed, judgement should be witheld by people that dont consistently watch the product. someone was like, when did AMW break up the other day? come on!  |
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 16, 2009 16:54:44 GMT -5
WHAT AMW BROKE UP? WHEN!?
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jun 16, 2009 17:25:49 GMT -5
How is this 10 pages! Well 1.1 isn't that good it is pretty normal but it looks like it will stay that way for a while..
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 16, 2009 17:50:12 GMT -5
How is this 10 pages! Well 1.1 isn't that good it is pretty normal but it looks like it will stay that way for a while.. again rating dont dictate quality....RAw 3.2 rating...LOL TNA...1.1 rating? Really? TNA should just put on programming that entertains and not worry about ratings. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jun 16, 2009 22:05:14 GMT -5
How is this 10 pages! Well 1.1 isn't that good it is pretty normal but it looks like it will stay that way for a while.. again rating dont dictate quality....RAw 3.2 rating...LOL TNA...1.1 rating? Really? TNA should just put on programming that entertains and not worry about ratings. Kind like they're doing now?  . |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 17, 2009 1:57:20 GMT -5
again rating dont dictate quality....RAw 3.2 rating...LOL TNA...1.1 rating? Really? TNA should just put on programming that entertains and not worry about ratings. Kind like they're doing now? . exactly. lets just hope this isnt a pre salmmiversary thing |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jun 20, 2009 0:10:42 GMT -5
-Gerweck
|
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Jun 20, 2009 0:12:33 GMT -5
Sixteen MINUTES of wrestling? Holy cow...
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy on Jun 20, 2009 0:15:10 GMT -5
1.2 THE TIDES ARE CHANGING!
|
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jun 29, 2009 9:23:03 GMT -5
-GERWECK
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 29, 2009 12:53:16 GMT -5
and that epic failure of a raw did a 4.something...HA. Rating are the wrestling marks crutch. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jun 29, 2009 12:57:02 GMT -5
and that epic failure of a raw did a 4.something...HA. Rating are the wrestling marks crutch. The reason RAW had a high rating was because it was no commercials. But why are you coming at me for WWE? Did I provoke you in any way? No. I have just realized that all you try to do is start arguments on this board. |
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Jun 29, 2009 13:09:01 GMT -5
This whole "ratings dont mean anything" is bull shit. People watch WWE more than TNA...even if WWE is terrible (which it is) they still watch it over TNA. Get the over it, all of you... |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 29, 2009 13:13:14 GMT -5
and that epic failure of a raw did a 4.something...HA. Rating are the wrestling marks crutch. The reason RAW had a high rating was because it was no commercials. But why are you coming at me for WWE? Did I provoke you in any way? No. I have just realized that all you try to do is start arguments on this board. whoa whoa whoah buddy, you need to back yourself up. I wasnt trying to start an arguement i just was making a point that its crazy that tna gets a low rating while raw gets a high rating when tna was clearly better. And i wasnt calling you a mark, i was talking about how marks in general think ratings actually mean somehting. I was commenting on your post, it had absolutely nothing to do with you man, sorry if you took it that way  . hey you show props to MJ, i give you that. Oh wait, your name used to be Joey: wwe mark wasnt it? lol, yeah that was in no way pointed at you man/ I like to debate when people have something to debate about. Im not one to go and start stuff, i just like to debate about theings. . I did say wrestling mark not WWE mark. And for the record commented on what you quoted from Gerweck, not what you actually said, so if anything that was directed at him. |
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jun 29, 2009 13:18:24 GMT -5
But when you say TNA had a better show then WWE, thats just you saying it. One person doesnt change anything in the rating. You can say that the ratings are flawed, but either way, fact is- WWE has more watchers. Even if TNA has an amazing show, the ratings are still going to be 1.2. Why? Because it's the same people watching the show. It's not a rating on the show, it's on the amount of viewers.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 29, 2009 13:30:02 GMT -5
But when you say TNA had a better show then WWE, thats just you saying it. One person doesnt change anything in the rating. You can say that the ratings are flawed, but either way, fact is- WWE has more watchers. Even if TNA has an amazing show, the ratings are still going to be 1.2. Why? Because it's the same people watching the show. It's not a rating on the show, it's on the amount of viewers. my point is that ok yes Raw has more people watching it but that does not mean its the better show just becasue more people watch it. There are more people maybe that like the stars on WWE. More people watch Notre dame football nationally then any other team? Is that becasue Notre dame has a good prodcut? not recently. Or is it becasue they have a bigger fan base so people will watch them just becasues. Thats the same reason i say ratings dont measure how good a show is or isnt. It only measures who's watching at that time. Raw i thought was poop. When tna got a 1.3 i thought that was poop. and yes im but one person but if the ratings fluctaute so much and are so varied on opinion, or wheterh or not some one with a nielsen box feels like watching at that time, how then can we put any validity in the ratings. Then what we end up doing is pointing the finger or making accusations against each others brands becasue of ratings. ratings that measure nothing but the amount of people that decided to watch. maybe its just that i see wrestling differently. Iobviously am mostly in the minority so maybe thats the case. And i watched Raw this week. so should raw get high praise for high ratings or high prasie for good quality programming. To me they should get praise for the rating not for the fart they left on my tv Monday night. but again if all it measures is who watched then you cant use ratings as a tool or a standard of quality programming. therefore people cant make the arguemtn,well look at wwe they get a 4.0 and tna getss a 1.0. Again as i said, that's what the marks do. they eat these ratings as if they actually indicate a quality show, which imo it doesnt. then they wanna throw it in people face to say ahhh tna sux or wwe sux. If the majority of the people think that what we saw on raw was entertaining then its no wonder wrestling is in the state that its in. |
|
