|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 15:13:30 GMT -5
Well.. geez. Maybe it's getting serious. Maybe she wants to be closer to Jeff & get to know his daughters better and you can't do that from PA, now can ya? It's not like Jeff's going to move to PA especially since his house he lives in now is his "dream house" and he's just outside of Nashville. Karen has every right to move to Nashville to live with her boyfriend. It doesn't matter if Kurt's pissed off or not. It's pretty obvious that things are getting serious between Jeff & Karen with her moving in with him. Karen can't stop living her life because Kurt can't handle she wants to live with her new boyfriend. Sometimes it takes something like this (Karen moving in with Jeff) to figure out exactly how serious things are and is it going to last. Know what I mean? I refuse to get pissed off at Karen Angle for moving on & moving in with Jeff just like I refuse to be pissed at Jeff for being able to move on after everything Jill went through. Sorry.. I just see no problem with two ADULTS who are dating living together. But you don't refuse to get pissed off at Angle for being bitter towards Karen and Jeff for him blowing 2 million on a house and for taking his kids away from him. Okay. You do realize how far away Nashville is from PA right? For the second time. They're NOT taking his kids away from him. If he has visatation rights he still sees them no matter if they move to Canada. He will still get to see his kids for crying out loud. Plus.. if he doesn't re-sign with TNA and goes back to the WWE. He won't get to see his kids then.. on HIS decison. Again, I'm not about to be pissed at Karen for wanting to live with her current boyfriend and not a house her ex bought for her.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 15:21:45 GMT -5
But you don't refuse to get pissed off at Angle for being bitter towards Karen and Jeff for him blowing 2 million on a house and for taking his kids away from him. Okay. You do realize how far away Nashville is from PA right? For the second time. They're NOT taking his kids away from him. If he has visatation rights he still sees them no matter if they move to Canada. He will still get to see his kids for crying out loud. Plus.. if he doesn't re-sign with TNA and goes back to the WWE. He won't get to see his kids then.. on HIS decison. Again, I'm not about to be pissed at Karen for wanting to live with her current boyfriend and not a house her ex bought for her. OMG, you don't realize what I'm saying. I know he has visitation rights. Hence why he bought them a house in Pittsburgh. That would have been fine, he could see his kids. But since she has custody of the kids and they are moving to Nashville with her 'lover', that makes things far more difficult for Kurt. But oh, she's in love so it makes things okay. No problems
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 15:24:21 GMT -5
For the second time. They're NOT taking his kids away from him. If he has visatation rights he still sees them no matter if they move to Canada. He will still get to see his kids for crying out loud. Plus.. if he doesn't re-sign with TNA and goes back to the WWE. He won't get to see his kids then.. on HIS decison. Again, I'm not about to be pissed at Karen for wanting to live with her current boyfriend and not a house her ex bought for her. OMG, you don't realize what I'm saying. I know he has visitation rights. Hence why he bought them a house in Pittsburgh. That would have been fine, he could see his kids. But since she has custody of the kids and they are moving to Nashville with her 'lover', that makes things far more difficult for Kurt. But oh, she's in love so it makes things okay. No problems It doesn't make it that difficult at all. If Kurt wants to see his kids so bad like he should. It wouldn't be difficult at all. I gave you a couple of diffrent scenrios (Meeting Karen Halfway, Karen taking the kids to Orlando on tape days every two weeks since that's starting back, and Kurt going to Nashville and spending a couple of days with them there). He still gets to see his kids & the "difficulty" level is really no diffrent then when he was on the road. The same thing would happen if the roles were reversed and Kurt had custody of the kids, Karen bought him a house, and Kurt chose to move in with Rhaka Khan. It's not that difficult. It's only difficult if you make it difficult (Not "you", Kurt)
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 15:29:43 GMT -5
OMG, you don't realize what I'm saying. I know he has visitation rights. Hence why he bought them a house in Pittsburgh. That would have been fine, he could see his kids. But since she has custody of the kids and they are moving to Nashville with her 'lover', that makes things far more difficult for Kurt. But oh, she's in love so it makes things okay. No problems It doesn't make it that difficult at all. If Kurt wants to see his kids so bad like he should. It wouldn't be difficult at all. I gave you a couple of diffrent scenrios (Meeting Karen Halfway, Karen taking the kids to Orlando on tape days every two weeks since that's starting back, and Kurt going to Nashville and spending a couple of days with them there). He still gets to see his kids & the "difficulty" level is really no diffrent then when he was on the road. The same thing would happen if the roles were reversed and Kurt had custody of the kids, Karen bought him a house, and Kurt chose to move in with Rhaka Khan. It's not that difficult. It's only difficult if you make it difficult (Not "you", Kurt) A trip to there house in Pittsburgh would be a LOT easier than flying halfway. And most likely, Kurt won't resign with the company so the TNA tapings idea is basically out the window. I still feel that is a prick move on Karens part and Jeff is scum for allowing it.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 15:44:20 GMT -5
It doesn't make it that difficult at all. If Kurt wants to see his kids so bad like he should. It wouldn't be difficult at all. I gave you a couple of diffrent scenrios (Meeting Karen Halfway, Karen taking the kids to Orlando on tape days every two weeks since that's starting back, and Kurt going to Nashville and spending a couple of days with them there). He still gets to see his kids & the "difficulty" level is really no diffrent then when he was on the road. The same thing would happen if the roles were reversed and Kurt had custody of the kids, Karen bought him a house, and Kurt chose to move in with Rhaka Khan. It's not that difficult. It's only difficult if you make it difficult (Not "you", Kurt) A trip to there house in Pittsburgh would be a LOT easier than flying halfway. And most likely, Kurt won't resign with the company so the TNA tapings idea is basically out the window. I still feel that is a prick move on Karens part and Jeff is scum for allowing it. Yeah, Jeff's scum for not saying "oh no.. you can't move in here". That's stupid. Seems to me you're not pissed this happened.. you're pissed it happended to Kurt and if the roles where reversed you wouldn't give a crap.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 15:47:47 GMT -5
A trip to there house in Pittsburgh would be a LOT easier than flying halfway. And most likely, Kurt won't resign with the company so the TNA tapings idea is basically out the window. I still feel that is a prick move on Karens part and Jeff is scum for allowing it. Yeah, Jeff's scum for not saying "oh no.. you can't move in here". That's stupid. Seems to me you're not pissed this happened.. you're pissed it happended to Kurt and if the roles where reversed you wouldn't give a crap. Or maybe he could have said lets wait till it gets more serious. you know like.. marriage? And to your idiotic comment, who are you to say that? If it was reversed you would be angry at Kurt and feeling sooo sorry for Jeff..
|
|
Doctor Colossus
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 26, 2001 10:45:09 GMT -5
Posts: 1,839
|
Post by Doctor Colossus on Jul 22, 2009 15:48:48 GMT -5
Besides, you can't just move the kids wherever you want. This has to be agreed upon in court. Kurt has done everything that Karen has asked of him for the sake of the KIDS and doesn't feel like going to UNCLE JEFF's house all the time to see his kids. I am starting to think "Cross the Line" IS Jeff Jarrett. He's the only one defending this prick.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 16:01:18 GMT -5
Yes.. you've figured me out. I'm Jeff Jarrett. . Forgive me for not being ticked off at someone for having a life and moving on.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 16:03:21 GMT -5
I honestly don't care what Karen does, it's her life- she can do what she wants. But she isn't just dealing with her life, it's the children lives as well.
And I won't take back what I said, Jeff is scum for allowing it.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 16:08:43 GMT -5
I honestly don't care what Karen does, it's her life- she can do what she wants. But she isn't just dealing with her life, it's the children lives as well. And I won't take back what I said, Jeff is scum for allowing it. Yeah, she is dealing with her children lives. Ever think that's why she wants to get away from Kurt? We don't know what has went down with Karen & Kurt after the course of their marriage so she could want to get away from him so she can fully move on and not have to worry about Kurt poping up at her house any given day and sticks to a schdule of Kurt gets them on weekends and they spend a few days with Kurt on Christmas. You can't put the blame on Jeff Jarrett if the court rules in Karen's favor and why wouldn't they rule in her favor? Kurt's wrestling & doing movies. Karen.. what's she do? She probally stays home with the kids. If Kurt can prove she's an "unfit mother" he can have the kids everyday. And "She's trying to live with her new boyfriend!" does not make her an unfit mother..
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 16:14:09 GMT -5
Dude, you don't understand this. Those are HIS kids. Who gives a flying if she wants to get away from Kurt? She has to follow the courts demands by letting Kurt see his kids. And I never said it's Jeff's fault if they favor with Karen. What I'm saying is they are JUST dating. If Jeff wasn't a prick, he'd talk to her about staying in Pittsburgh until they get more serious.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 16:19:38 GMT -5
Dude, you don't understand this. Those are HIS kids. Who gives a flying if she wants to get away from Kurt? She has to follow the courts demands by letting Kurt see his kids. And I never said it's Jeff's fault if they favor with Karen. What I'm saying is they are JUST dating. If Jeff wasn't a prick, he'd talk to her about staying in Pittsburgh until they get more serious. Oh.. it's nice to see you were in the court room when they made ruling about what happens with the kids. Wait, you weren't. You don't know what the ruling was or wasn't, neither do I. They could've said Karen could chose weather or not Kurt saw the kids every day or the weekend or what. You nor I (or anyone on this forum) knows what the final word was about the kids. I'm not saying "OH NO KURT SHOULDN'T SEE HIS KIDS" but if the court rules "You can move, Karen" there's nothing anyone can do. For all we know the court has already made a ruling about it and Karen can move. All I know is this - if Karen moves to Nashville with the courts permission - the bottom line is Kurt will get to see his kids. No question about it unless the court rules that Kurt shouldn't be able to. He'll see his kids no matter what. You're making this huge deal about the kids - he'll get see them and they'll get to see him. She could move to Canada and he would still see his kids. I see no reason for her not to be able to move to TN just because "Kurt won't get his kids everyday".
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 16:21:01 GMT -5
Dude, you don't understand this. Those are HIS kids. Who gives a flying if she wants to get away from Kurt? She has to follow the courts demands by letting Kurt see his kids. And I never said it's Jeff's fault if they favor with Karen. What I'm saying is they are JUST dating. If Jeff wasn't a prick, he'd talk to her about staying in Pittsburgh until they get more serious. Oh.. it's nice to see you were in the court room when they made ruling about what happens with the kids. Wait, you weren't. You don't know what the ruling was or wasn't, neither do I. They could've said Karen could chose weather or not Kurt saw the kids every day or the weekend or what. You nor I (or anyone on this forum) knows what the final word was about the kids. I'm not saying "OH NO KURT SHOULDN'T SEE HIS KIDS" but if the court rules "You can move, Karen" there's nothing anyone can do. For all we know the court has already made a ruling about it and Karen can move. We don't know. I HIGHLY doubt that. If that was the case, Dixie wouldn't be mad and neither would Kurt.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jul 22, 2009 16:26:33 GMT -5
I'm seriously loving reading you two fight over a situation that, in reality, you know absolutely nothing about. You may have your "insiders" and "exclusive web updates", but neither of you are actually associated with Jeff, Karen, or Kurt.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 16:28:24 GMT -5
I'm seriously loving reading you two fight over a situation that, in reality, you know absolutely nothing about. You may have your "insiders" and "exclusive web updates", but neither of you are actually associated with Jeff, Karen, or Kurt. But he's Jeff Jarrett
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 16:31:31 GMT -5
I'm seriously loving reading you two fight over a situation that, in reality, you know absolutely nothing about. You may have your "insiders" and "exclusive web updates", but neither of you are actually associated with Jeff, Karen, or Kurt. Neither of us said we knew anything about the situation. I'm using hypothetical situations & the "court" stuff (vistation and such) is coming from what I know about how it is in GA (Yes, I know it diffrents) Also.. Joey.. I was being a smartass with the Jeff Jarrett comment since he brought up how I was the only one defending Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 16:32:27 GMT -5
I'm seriously loving reading you two fight over a situation that, in reality, you know absolutely nothing about. You may have your "insiders" and "exclusive web updates", but neither of you are actually associated with Jeff, Karen, or Kurt. Neither of us said we knew anything about the situation. I'm using hypothetical situations & the "court" stuff (vistation and such) is coming from what I know about how it is in GA (Yes, I know it diffrents) Also.. Joey.. I was being a smartass with the Jeff Jarrett comment since he brought up how I was the only one defending Jeff. I'm not intellectually- disabled, buddy. And sean, this is what forums is about. dicuss things. Never said we have to know the guys to have a friendly debate, which to other people think its a fight- which it never really is.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jul 22, 2009 16:35:41 GMT -5
Neither of us said we knew anything about the situation. I'm using hypothetical situations & the "court" stuff (vistation and such) is coming from what I know about how it is in GA (Yes, I know it diffrents) Also.. Joey.. I was being a smartass with the Jeff Jarrett comment since he brought up how I was the only one defending Jeff. I'm not intellectually- disabled, buddy. And sean, this is what forums is about. dicuss things. Never said we have to know the guys to have a friendly debate, which to other people think its a fight- which it never really is. Exactly, it's just a little debate. Nothing more than that really. It's not like we're taking pot-shots at each other. It's just a situation where the best thing to do is agree to disgaree.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jul 22, 2009 16:55:23 GMT -5
a. I'm aware of the purpose, as well as function, of a forum. b. I never said either of you "said" that you were close friends with either. c. I was actually making mention to all of the accusations made towards the actions of Karen Angle. It's not so much that either of you stated that you know anything for a fact, as much as it is that you are stating things as if they are fact.
That's just my opinion on the little debate you guys were having. But to "stay on topic", here's my 2 cents.
Now, the only thing we "know" is that they were messing around close to when the Jeff/Angle feud started, and that they are now a couple. So lets say a rough idea of October 2008.
That's almost 9 months of them "possibly" being an item. Not to mention the fact that Kurt started in TNA in 2006, so thats an addition 2 years that Karen and Jeff have known each other. I met my wife 4 years before we started dating, and were married within 2 years. I understand that not all relationships work as mine did, but thats the whole point.
Every relationship is different, depending on who's in it. To say that Karen and Jeff "haven't been together long enough to move in" or "are just dating" is completely irrelevent. The only people who can determain where they are in their relationship is them. You can stand outside glass houses all you want, but the only people who can say where they are in a relationship, as well as make responsible decisions in the relationship is Karen and Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jul 22, 2009 17:09:58 GMT -5
a. I'm aware of the purpose, as well as function, of a forum. b. I never said either of you "said" that you were close friends with either. c. I was actually making mention to all of the accusations made towards the actions of Karen Angle. It's not so much that either of you stated that you know anything for a fact, as much as it is that you are stating things as if they are fact. That's just my opinion on the little debate you guys were having. But to "stay on topic", here's my 2 cents. Now, the only thing we "know" is that they were messing around close to when the Jeff/Angle feud started, and that they are now a couple. So lets say a rough idea of October 2008. That's almost 9 months of them "possibly" being an item. Not to mention the fact that Kurt started in TNA in 2006, so thats an addition 2 years that Karen and Jeff have known each other. I met my wife 4 years before we started dating, and were married within 2 years. I understand that not all relationships work as mine did, but thats the whole point. Every relationship is different, depending on who's in it. To say that Karen and Jeff "haven't been together long enough to move in" or "are just dating" is completely irrelevent. The only people who can determain where they are in their relationship is them. You can stand outside glass houses all you want, but the only people who can say where they are in a relationship, as well as make responsible decisions in the relationship is Karen and Jeff. That is true, but all I think is that Karen should respect Kurt in the sense that if she isn't married to Jeff, Kurt shouldn't have to go to Jeff's house or whatever to see his kids. Thats all.
|
|