|
Post by WalterF on Aug 10, 2009 13:25:56 GMT -5
Only if he comes back and jobs to HBK. Otherwise he can stay retired.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Aug 10, 2009 13:26:01 GMT -5
Wow, big deal. Austin put the Rock over after both of them were nearing the end of their wrestling careers, and after he was 2-0 against the Rock at 'Mania to begin with. The Rock didn't need Hogan's torch? That was a dream match people were talking about for a while before it happened, Hulk Hogan vs. the Rock, two of WWE's most charismatic stars of all time. Anyone NEEDS a win over Hulk Hogan, that makes you legitimate, it cements your place in wrestling history since it gives you something that doesn't happen often. And he sure did put over Kurt Angle, and Billy Kidman back in WCW. So what? In 1990, Hulk Hogan attempted to pass the torch to the Warrior. He failed. In 1998, the Warrior comes to WCW after getting creative control on his gimmick (that one Warrior nation flop was his idea, I'm sure) and agreed to do the job to Hogan following nWo sheenanigans. I don't see how that's Hogan's fault, or how him beating someone eight years down the line means he didn't try passing the torch to him later? That's like Sting and Flair wrestling in 1990 and Flair jobbing and passing the torch, and then he beats Sting eight years down the line. Did that match changed what happened in 1990? No, he still did the job and handed the 'torch' over. Same applies for Hogan/Warrior. I like this conversation, it is cilivlized thank you for keeping it that way... plus one or minus one? LMK, anyways. I have to respectfully disagree with you, The Rock did not need a win against Hogan at that stage of his career... To Hogans credit he did out The Rock over twice, I think the only person to get Hogans torch was undertaker Has for modern WWE Hogan, Brock needed the win, The Rock at WM 18 right? Did not I believe Thanks man, +1 if that's cool, and I'll do the same for you. I don't like name-calling if it can be avoided, obviously. Here's the thing with that, I wouldn't even say the Undertaker got Hogan's torch... since he won the belt via Flair interference. Plus, Hogan won it back a week later. Selfish of him, definitely, and not my idea of passing any torch. Years later, they had one of the worst matches ever. I remember in WCW, Hogan jobbed the World title to a 23 year old Big Show (the Giant back then), who was a rookie but had tremendous size. I'd say that was an act of torch passing, hopefully that counts for something. And back to the Rock, yeah Hogan did him the favor twice, but still.. 2002 was the Rock at his height, over as hell, getting those Saturday Night Live gigs, in a wave of merchandise momentum... I think that was the perfect time to give him Hogan. And I might be a little biased cause I was there live, but that was a pretty amazing match to be there for. At the end, Hogan admitted defeat, shook the Rock's hand and cleared the way for him. I'd say that was an act of passing the torch, and the win over Hogan only shot his momentum into overdrive. The Rock was a big player in wrestling beforehand, but he was an icon after that night. So while yes, Hogan's a dick, when he had his mind in the right place, with a wave of his hand... he could pretty much help get anyone over. Unless their name's Brutus Beefcake.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Aug 10, 2009 13:27:12 GMT -5
Actually he's said he would have put Brock over, but he disagreed with the fact that it was on Raw with literally no hype, so he walked. I agree; something of that magnitude deserves to be hyped up, and on PPV as well. I disagree with his methods, and he does now as well, but I believe him when he says he still would have put Brock over. Giving it away for free with no build up is a bad business decision. What say should Austin have on the matter? His role is that of an employee, he should do whats asked of him. Hmm.. so Hogan paying Nick Patrick to do a slow count at Starrcade '99 was right. Or maybe threating to leave the company in 1993 if he didn't win the title at WrestleMania. Yeah, Hogan was a one of a kind worker.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Aug 10, 2009 13:30:19 GMT -5
What say should Austin have on the matter? His role is that of an employee, he should do whats asked of him. Hmm.. so Hogan paying Nick Patrick to do a slow count at Starrcade '99 was right. Or maybe threating to leave the company in 1993 if he didn't win the title at WrestleMania. Yeah, Hogan was a one of a kind worker. You mean Starrcade '97. And Hogan "paid Nick Patrick to do a slow count"? Do you believe in kayfabe? Who won that match in the end? Sting. And Sting has THREE wins over Hogan, while Hogan has ZERO over him. And that's what matters in the end. 'Mania IX I don't really have an excuse for, that was probably the worst move Hogan ever did. But, others have done similar, like Triple H being handed the World title by Bischoff on an episode of RAW, for no real reason other than he was the top guy.
|
|
|
Post by downsyndrome on Aug 10, 2009 13:31:41 GMT -5
I like this conversation, it is cilivlized thank you for keeping it that way... plus one or minus one? LMK, anyways. I have to respectfully disagree with you, The Rock did not need a win against Hogan at that stage of his career... To Hogans credit he did out The Rock over twice, I think the only person to get Hogans torch was undertaker Has for modern WWE Hogan, Brock needed the win, The Rock at WM 18 right? Did not I believe Thanks man, +1 if that's cool, and I'll do the same for you. I don't like name-calling if it can be avoided, obviously. Here's the thing with that, I wouldn't even say the Undertaker got Hogan's torch... since he won the belt via Flair interference. Plus, Hogan won it back a week later. Selfish of him, definitely, and not my idea of passing any torch. Years later, they had one of the worst matches ever. I remember in WCW, Hogan jobbed the World title to a 23 year old Big Show (the Giant back then), who was a rookie but had tremendous size. I'd say that was an act of torch passing, hopefully that counts for something. And back to the Rock, yeah Hogan did him the favor twice, but still.. 2002 was the Rock at his height, over as hell, getting those Saturday Night Live gigs, in a wave of merchandise momentum... I think that was the perfect time to give him Hogan. And I might be a little biased cause I was there live, but that was a pretty amazing match to be there for. At the end, Hogan admitted defeat, shook the Rock's hand and cleared the way for him. I'd say that was an act of passing the torch, and the win over Hogan only shot his momentum into overdrive. The Rock was a big player in wrestling beforehand, but he was an icon after that night. So while yes, Hogan's a dick, when he had his mind in the right place, with a wave of his hand... he could pretty much help get anyone over. Unless their name's Brutus Beefcake. Yea, but by all accounts... was the E building them up as Icon Vs Icon before the match..so The Rock was already a icon...were beating a head horse here... As for the UT thing, I see where you are coming from. But, he did put Angle and Brock over clean...so..if I need say he passed the torch, thats who it was to.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Aug 10, 2009 13:35:49 GMT -5
Yea, but by all accounts... was the E building them up as Icon Vs Icon before the match..so The Rock was already a icon...were beating a head horse here... As for the UT thing, I see where you are coming from. But, he did put Angle and Brock over clean...so..if I need say he passed the torch, thats who it was to. Regardless, Hogan will have the most spotty record in wrestling history. If he put someone over, he really put them over. If he buried them, they were eight feet under. As for the Rock issue: slam.canoe.ca/SlamWrestlingWM18/mar18_wmgramlich-can.htmlTop title in red-- "Hogan passes torch at WrestleMania", just Google "Hogan passing torch to Rock" or something, and you'll find a massive list of sites bringing up that fact. I still think Hogan passed the torch to the Rock, you think otherwise, it's all good, as long as we both can come to terms on the crowd being pro-Hogan that night.
|
|
|
Post by renownedwarriorv76 on Aug 10, 2009 13:38:34 GMT -5
now i love and respect hulk hogan and the things he has done for the business but i don't think this is wise, i mean it feels like he is desperately tryin to stay in the wrestling media to the point where it is becoming sad
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Aug 10, 2009 13:43:20 GMT -5
Actually he's said he would have put Brock over, but he disagreed with the fact that it was on Raw with literally no hype, so he walked. I agree; something of that magnitude deserves to be hyped up, and on PPV as well. I disagree with his methods, and he does now as well, but I believe him when he says he still would have put Brock over. Giving it away for free with no build up is a bad business decision. What say should Austin have on the matter? His role is that of an employee, he should do whats asked of him. Remember, Hulk Hogan did job on free TV to Bill Goldberg. And plus.. this was the period of time where Austin was out of control, in 2002. I'm pretty sure he had himself go over Scott Hall at Mania 18 too, which made no sense since Austin pretty much buried the nWo from the get-go and had no problems exploiting Hall's alcoholism. Ah, but if we talk about being the role of an employee and having no say in the matter, the same can be said for Hulk Hogan refusing to put Bret Hart over. Austin should have some say in the matter, considering he was one of their top stars of the company at the time. Plus, he was right in the fact that it would have been a bad business decision, so he's speaking from a creative standpoint more than as a wrestler. And Hogan putting Goldberg over had build to it. It's not so much that it's free television, but the lack of any sort of build killed it. Goldberg and Hogan were at least feuding. I'm not saying Austin's a saint in putting people over, but I do believe he had a point and wasn't so much opposed to putting over Lesnar as much as he was to doing it without any hype, is all I'm saying.
|
|
|
Post by downsyndrome on Aug 10, 2009 13:43:25 GMT -5
Yea, but by all accounts... was the E building them up as Icon Vs Icon before the match..so The Rock was already a icon...were beating a head horse here... As for the UT thing, I see where you are coming from. But, he did put Angle and Brock over clean...so..if I need say he passed the torch, thats who it was to. Regardless, Hogan will have the most spotty record in wrestling history. If he put someone over, he really put them over. If he buried them, they were eight feet under. As for the Rock issue: slam.canoe.ca/SlamWrestlingWM18/mar18_wmgramlich-can.htmlTop title in red-- "Hogan passes torch at WrestleMania", just Google "Hogan passing torch to Rock" or something, and you'll find a massive list of sites bringing up that fact. I still think Hogan passed the torch to the Rock, you think otherwise, it's all good, as long as we both can come to terms on the crowd being pro-Hogan that night. ive seen the match, that crowd really was pro hogan is was sick. However...Hogan does owe hbk a win
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman on Aug 10, 2009 13:45:46 GMT -5
What say should Austin have on the matter? His role is that of an employee, he should do whats asked of him. Remember, Hulk Hogan did job on free TV to Bill Goldberg. And plus.. this was the period of time where Austin was out of control, in 2002. I'm pretty sure he had himself go over Scott Hall at Mania 18 too, which made no sense since Austin pretty much buried the nWo from the get-go and had no problems exploiting Hall's alcoholism. Ah, but if we talk about being the role of an employee and having no say in the matter, the same can be said for Hulk Hogan refusing to put Bret Hart over. Austin should have some say in the matter, considering he was one of their top stars of the company at the time. Plus, he was right in the fact that it would have been a bad business decision, so he's speaking from a creative standpoint more than as a wrestler. And Hogan putting Goldberg over had build to it. It's not so much that it's free television, but the lack of any sort of build killed it. Goldberg and Hogan were at least feuding. I'm not saying Austin's a saint in putting people over, but I do believe he had a point and wasn't so much opposed to putting over Lesnar as much as he was to doing it without any hype, is all I'm saying. I see what you mean. Hogan should've put Bret Hart over, 100%. But he did at least put Yokozuna over as a monster before he left the company, and he let Yoko literally squash him on the way out. But that's what good ol' Ric Flair was for, he did the job for Bret. I still don't dig the way Austin handled the whole nWo 2002 angle. He went over the nWo at every house show leading into Mania 18, beating Scott Hall and Kevin Nash at the same time at some points. Granted, there was a tag match between the nWo and Rock/Austin... but the Rock was the one taking the pin there. Scott Hall was supposed to beat Austin, but 'Stone Cold' vetoed it. I'm just saying that there must be a connection between his behavior here and his behavior regarding the Brock thing. 2002 won't be remembered as his best year, either way.
|
|
|
Post by layton on Aug 10, 2009 14:29:33 GMT -5
i meant to say austin passing the torch, not putting anyone over
|
|
|
Post by Noza on Aug 10, 2009 14:33:21 GMT -5
Oh god....
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 10, 2009 14:39:31 GMT -5
i meant to say austin passing the torch, not putting anyone over lol that isnt anything compared to a wrestling match, i knew someone was gonna post that
|
|
|
Post by The Sexy Psychotic on Aug 10, 2009 14:40:31 GMT -5
i meant to say austin passing the torch, not putting anyone over Amazing, just amazing
|
|
|
Post by layton on Aug 10, 2009 14:41:45 GMT -5
lol that isnt anything compared to a wrestling match, i knew someone was gonna post that You said pass a torch. That's definitely passing a torch. I am not a big supporter of Austin. I was never a big fan at all. But I believe he did quite a bit, symbolically, with toasting Cena right there. Also, he is still in great shape, and has not ruled out a match later. Austin is not a good wrestler, but at his age now, he's three times the wrestler Hogan ever was.
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Aug 10, 2009 14:43:03 GMT -5
I dont remember austin coming back and putting anyone over... 1. He physically couldn't. His facial expressions after all three Rock Bottoms told a scary story about the pain he was in. 2.He lost that very same match. He wen out that way you're "supposed to" as a pro wrestler. My point is that him coming back only to lose would prove absolutely nothing.
|
|
Bret_Hart_Mark™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 5, 2005 13:34:12 GMT -5
Posts: 2,272
|
Post by Bret_Hart_Mark™ on Aug 10, 2009 14:45:43 GMT -5
that wont happen. maybe him going over orton will though. Considering he still owes Shawn a rematch from SummerSlam, it better. Considering Shawn doesn't want to job to the Rock it better not.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Aug 10, 2009 14:48:33 GMT -5
pass a torch while youre at it Now shaddup. I believe the old saying is the proof is in the pudding. Hogan "passed the torch" to all of those men and none of them lasted. Warrior was a flop. Rock went off to Hollywood and Brock went to play football. Not knocking their decisions cause some of them are making better money then they were before, but they didnt put 20 years in the business as the main guy like Hogan did. Hogan is like Flair, he's not going to get any respect on this board because he wasnt part of the attitude era, wasnt a spot monkey in TLC matches and basically their prime years were behind them before most of the kiddies on this board were born.
|
|
*Ricky Spanish*
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 16, 2008 23:44:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,093
|
Post by *Ricky Spanish* on Aug 10, 2009 15:02:00 GMT -5
HBK vs. Hogan 2 at WM26. This time HBK gets the win. That would be a wrestlemania moment. It may have to be some type of gimmick match because who knows what Hulk has left in the tank, it would be a cross of the Hogan/McMahon Street fight from WM19 and HBk/McMahon Street fight from Wm22 Would LOVE hogan HBK II at Mania with HBK going over
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Aug 10, 2009 15:04:42 GMT -5
I believe the old saying is the proof is in the pudding. Hogan "passed the torch" to all of those men and none of them lasted. Warrior was a flop. Rock went off to Hollywood and Brock went to play football. Not knocking their decisions cause some of them are making better money then they were before, but they didnt put 20 years in the business as the main guy like Hogan did. Hogan is like Flair, he's not going to get any respect on this board because he wasnt part of the attitude era, wasnt a spot monkey in TLC matches and basically their prime years were behind them before most of the kiddies on this board were born. I'm not sure what are you talking about. I respect Flair, a lot. He did in the 80's what many believe that is not possible today, and that is sold out arenas with technical wrestling. See, I haven't seen any sign of disrespect for Flair. I've just seen he is old, which basically is the truth and isn't in any way being disrespectful. Now, if you are talking about many, including me, want Flair to stay out of the ring is because he is retired. He got a send off like no other, so that is why. As for Hogan, we can't say he was an amazing wrestler. We can say he had tons of charisma and put some people over. Both men did something for the business, but the fact is, Flair should stay retired. He can be a manager, GM, whatever, but please respect what WWE did for you in that send off and don't wrestle. Hogan was never a great wrestler, and with his problems and age, what can we expect? Also the fact that in his recent comebacks he's just buried people. I'm talking about 2005-2007 or 2008.
|
|