|
Post by jayrod2009 on Jan 5, 2010 0:14:20 GMT -5
VOTE!
|
|
zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Jan 5, 2010 0:31:11 GMT -5
theres gonna be alot of wwe people voting who wont give tna a chance lol
but i feel tna won it tonight.
|
|
|
Post by tnafan17: The Total Package on Jan 5, 2010 0:47:17 GMT -5
theres gonna be alot of wwe people voting who wont give tna a chance lol but i feel tna won it tonight. I feel the same way. Especially main event wise, Styles/Angle blew what WWE did out of the water.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 30, 2024 1:38:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2010 0:53:53 GMT -5
TNA had the better show but RAW's going to end up with the higher rating.
|
|
uvfan1
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Sept 6, 2007 17:02:05 GMT -5
Posts: 311
|
Post by uvfan1 on Jan 5, 2010 0:54:56 GMT -5
If you say WWE you are one biased mofo. TNA was just that good tonight.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 5, 2010 0:59:39 GMT -5
Take out the best parts of each show and rate it that way.
|
|
STING
Main Eventer
Mattel Basic Legends/Flashback Collector
Joined on: Sept 4, 2007 19:39:59 GMT -5
Posts: 2,816
|
Post by STING on Jan 5, 2010 1:07:59 GMT -5
TNA tonight, captured that "surprise" feeling that hasn't happened in wrestling for a long time.
GREAT SHOW!
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 5, 2010 1:11:01 GMT -5
TNA did put on a more exciting show, you had no clue who or what was really going to happen. I think if TNA goes live every week, they'll do well and start to attract more and more people. I enjoyed every match, I was glad the Beautiful People didn't actually wrestle but instead got some Venis Envy, best way to keep them employed. WWE was solid, it wasn't as exciting because they aren't really reacting to TNA's existence yet. Yes, they have Bret, that's still ing awesome to me. If you aren't stoked that Bret is finally doing stuff with WWE again, you simply never grew up with that man, that's all it is to me. WWE did not do a bad show, it just didn't have the vibe TNA had. But WWE also isn't basically going through management transition. I'll give it to TNA, they did well. But they better keep going live and move to Mondays, or who really cares?
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Jan 5, 2010 2:08:22 GMT -5
Raw was boring.. Even the bret hart nutshot was meh..
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Jan 5, 2010 2:11:49 GMT -5
TNA was all returns and 1 match, they can't have tons of suprises every week and that was the foundation of this show.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jan 5, 2010 2:25:18 GMT -5
Anybody that says TNA "won" is simply a TNA mark. I hate all current wrestling now days and nostalgic feeling is what I wanted from both shows. Neither show gave that to me but Raw still ran smoothly like a well oiled machine. TNA looked like one giant 3 hour cluster with 2 1/2 hours of commercials
|
|
zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Jan 5, 2010 2:29:19 GMT -5
TNA tonight, captured that "surprise" feeling that hasn't happened in wrestling for a long time. GREAT SHOW! indeed.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jan 5, 2010 2:55:56 GMT -5
That is funny how the votes are pretty much the same just switched with the wwe section poll being about 60% for wwe and tna getting 40% and now this poll has 60% for tna and 40% for wwe..
I think both shows were pretty boring and overhyped so I would pick draw if I could.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Jan 5, 2010 3:18:41 GMT -5
Anybody that says TNA "won" is simply a TNA mark. I'm not a fan of one or the other, I'm a Wrestling fan in general. To label us "Marks" just because this is the TNA Board & those of us that said TNA "won" is a load of S**t. I watched both together at the same time. Even the first hour of Impact was exciting / buzzing before RAW even started. In all honesty, after watching both shows, when they both finished, I felt that Tonight, TNA put on the over all better Show. The only thing good from RAW tonight was Bret Hart just being there in general, the whole Bret / HBK moment & then the possible build to Vince vs. Bret at Mania from the end of RAW. Oh & the DX/Hornswoggle/Santino backstage skit with Mattel Figures was quite funny. Other than that, I felt RAW was pretty lackluster tonight & failed to pull anything else bar the above mentioned out against TNA tonight. Kofi / Orton should have been kept for the Rumble as the big final blow off match, but we got it on TV & Orton went over. Kofi should have been going over to blow off the feud to make him look like a Top Contender for the Title at some point later this year. Based on just tonights shows alone Head to Head & not a "Monday Night War" in general like the old times, TNA would deserve to win the ratings for this Monday night, but, I still think RAW will win due to WWE's loyal fan base & nobody wanting to give TNA a chance.
|
|
Joe CR
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2008 5:54:34 GMT -5
Posts: 2,980
|
Post by Joe CR on Jan 5, 2010 3:26:20 GMT -5
TNA by far. If wwe put on a match like AJ/Angle then everyone would be calling it the best Raw of all time yet because its TNA it doesn't get the same respect. Compare the women matches also. Maryse vs A Bella or Sarita & Taylor vs Kong & Hamada. We all know which was better out of those 2. Jeff returning was extremely surprising as well as some other great returns. Raw was extremely weak. Yes Bret returning was cool but to me it wasn't as good as expected mainly because of no acknowledgement to the Hart Dynasty. The backstage skits like usual were boring as well as a cluster of a fatal 4 way. TNA wasn't perfect either though. Nasty Boys got well too much time and did we really need to see Dr Stevie and Raven in that tag match over Beer Money/MCMG. Despite that overall TNA's product was far superior however Raw will ease in the ratings war.
|
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on Jan 5, 2010 4:07:40 GMT -5
I think RAW was better..
TNA just aquired a bunch of ex-WWE wrestlers...
..and not even any good ones...they got all the drug addicts, over the hill, out of shape ex-wwe wrestlers.
The main event between Angle/AJ was amazing...but that was honestly (for me) the only highlight of the show. Raw isn't f***ing amazing but I feel as me getting excited about either show Raw did the better job. It was amazing seeing Scott Hall on tv again but he looked f***ing horrible...
|
|
Figuremania™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 30, 2009 23:03:47 GMT -5
Posts: 2,790
|
Post by Figuremania™ on Jan 5, 2010 6:25:14 GMT -5
TNA Did A Hell Of Alot Better then what I thought I Mean Jeff Hardy Was a shock and they managed to sign him and Flair was a surprise (But Money Talks ) just by reading the results and watching clips it looks great - Can't Wait to Watch it! RAW On the other hand had boring matches but Bret Harts return and promos just made RAW! It Was Great! Glad to see Bret Back! I Don't Know I Think WWE Will Top The Ratings but I and TNA can say they did a fantastic job!
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Jan 5, 2010 8:15:15 GMT -5
theres gonna be alot of wwe people voting who wont give tna a chance lol but i feel tna won it tonight. I feel the same way. Especially main event wise, Styles/Angle blew what WWE did out of the water. ^ Without question! AJ vs. Angle > Kofi vs. Orton In all seriousness, I am surprised they didn't put DX vs. Jeri-Show as the main event. But overall, TNA had a better, more exciting show. I do wish more new talent/TNA originals had been given camera time. Nasty Boys had WAY too much TV titme and they didn't even wrestle!
|
|
|
Post by 3Lephant (Naptown Icon) on Jan 5, 2010 12:25:19 GMT -5
Anybody that says TNA "won" is simply a TNA mark. I hate all current wrestling now days and nostalgic feeling is what I wanted from both shows. Neither show gave that to me but Raw still ran smoothly like a well oiled machine. TNA looked like one giant 3 hour cluster with 2 1/2 hours of commercials Thats just an ignorant statement, who made you the authority to decide that just by enjoying TNA's show more makes them a mark? I went to Raw in Dayton Ohio. Guess what I did when I went home? I managed to stay away from any spoilers and watched the show straight through. I thought TNA was a much better show than Raw. I still enjoyed Raw, how could I not? I was 6th row watching Bret's return. If you compare, TNA had: Val Venis return (like) Bubba the love sponge (dislike) Nasty Boys (dislike) Flair (superlike) Hall/Waltman (neutral) TNA Knockout's Tag Title match (superlike, great action great match) ODB winning the women's title (dislike) Jeff Hardy (like, and huge surprise. does that make me a TNA mark because I liked something they did?) Bischoff on camera - Like. WWE had: Maryse vs. a Bella twin (wtf?) Jerishow vs. DX - Same old match we've had with them before Kofi/Orton - Same old finish. Bret Hart - superlike How can you even argue that TNA didn't have a better show? The only real appeal to it was Bret Hart. And if it wasn't for him, I would have been pissed for driving 2 hours to see a god awful show
|
|
zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Jan 5, 2010 12:41:03 GMT -5
kinda funny tna is winning here, but over in the wwe thread its loosing lol
|
|