|
Post by Hurricane on Jan 12, 2010 21:06:14 GMT -5
Oh, sorry. I didn't reliaze there was some rule on here that says "All Vince Russo news & discussion must be placed in one post". I can't wait until Russo posts that he's taking a sh*t on his Facebook page, you'd probably post that like it's some big revelation too. You're a douche. And ending a cage match by DQ is ricockulous, but at least there was a reason (nobody could escape it).
|
|
|
Post by Flyrfn144 on Jan 12, 2010 22:27:25 GMT -5
Ending a cage match by DQ is stupid, ridiculous, and absolutely the wrong way for it to end. Plain and simple
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Jan 13, 2010 0:10:31 GMT -5
Aha...TNA said the only way to win was to escape the cage...but they never said that not escaping the cage was the only way to lose!
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Jan 13, 2010 0:14:28 GMT -5
MMA has different rules, so it's stupid to even begin to ask that question.
In wrestling, you don't DQ in a cage, it's very simple to understand that, but apparently some geniuses can't figure that out.
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 13, 2010 0:15:50 GMT -5
Aha...TNA said the only way to win was to escape the cage...but they never said that not escaping the cage was the only way to lose! Did TNA hire M. Night?
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Jan 13, 2010 0:30:58 GMT -5
It still doesn't make sense but if not for that dq we may have never gotten Homicide stuck trying to climb out so I call the whole thing a wash.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jan 13, 2010 0:34:16 GMT -5
oh silly us! how did we not realize something went on in the back that affected the outcome of the cage match! stupid us, we shouldn't judge their product, we should just realize that there are forces we don't understand!
jesus...
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Jan 13, 2010 0:57:02 GMT -5
Lets think this clearly, you are put in a cage to settle your differences, the cage is a weapon in its self, Therefore ensuing a DQ would not only be redundant because you're treating a CAGE match which is a speciality match but as a normal single's competition. It may not be written in any "wrestling rule book" (im quite sure one doesnt exsist) but the rules are ing implied and common sense would have it be within these "rules"
|
|
|
Post by Elliot on Jan 13, 2010 7:45:02 GMT -5
Lets think this clearly, you are put in a cage to settle your differences, the cage is a weapon in its self, Therefore ensuing a DQ would not only be redundant because you're treating a CAGE match which is a speciality match but as a normal single's competition. It may not be written in any "wrestling rule book" (im quite sure one doesnt exsist) but the rules are fuking implied and common sense would have it be within these "rules" Vince Russo and common sense could not be further apart.
|
|
|
Post by dmallett4 on Jan 13, 2010 13:34:25 GMT -5
sodaguy let me guess. you think a dq was the right decision?
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 13, 2010 16:19:28 GMT -5
sodaguy let me guess. you think a dq was the right decision? Did I say that? No, I didn't. And no, I don't think it was the "right decision".
|
|
|
Post by mnm213 on Jan 13, 2010 17:00:11 GMT -5
Fair enough, something behind the scenes was the cause of it. Still made it look a bit silly on TV though.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Jan 13, 2010 17:03:40 GMT -5
No offense to TNA either, but seriously, no one in that match could climb the ing cage?
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 13, 2010 17:09:14 GMT -5
No offense to TNA either, but seriously, no one in that match could climb the ing cage? That's bullcrap. Suicide & Lethal both have won the match.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 13, 2010 17:17:03 GMT -5
No offense to TNA either, but seriously, no one in that match could climb the ing cage? That's bullcrap. Suicide & Lethal both have won the match. He did say THAT match.
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Jan 13, 2010 17:28:23 GMT -5
That's bullcrap. Suicide & Lethal both have won the match. He did say THAT match. ....Yes, THAT match were Suicide & Lethal were both in. Which was my point. Lethal & Suicide (well, Kazarian) have both WON the match there for would've been able to escape. So, the "No one could escape" point is null and void.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Jan 13, 2010 17:33:07 GMT -5
Just to add, I was laughing my ass off when Homicide couldnt get out of the cage. But at the same time, I felt bad... but most of it was laughter.
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jan 13, 2010 17:36:44 GMT -5
Sometimes things happen "off TV" that may determine why we do a finish we do. [/b] [/center]
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jan 13, 2010 17:59:39 GMT -5
"The cage can be used as a weapon."
That sentence uttered every Cage Match should be enough to point out Russo's stupidity. if you can use large fences to bloddy your opponents, then a flapjack seems okay to use in a Cage.
|
|
DKR
Main Eventer
It's all good...
Joined on: Feb 13, 2008 13:23:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,916
|
Post by DKR on Jan 13, 2010 18:15:49 GMT -5
That was the first time I ever saw one of those infamous TNA red cage of death matches and I was utterly confused. I have been a wrestling fan for 20 years and I was very confused.
Considering TNA was banking on having an influx of new viewers that night, you would think they would spoon feed the casual audience that was tuning in. Instead they had a cage match end in a DQ, had one of the competitors in the match awkwardly climb and attempt to escape said cage...and rely on the TV and live audience to know that a "behind the scenes reason" was the culprit of this debacle.
Got it. Go TNA.
|
|