|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 24, 2010 18:11:51 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 6:07:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2010 18:22:57 GMT -5
yeah, thats dumb i give you that one.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 24, 2010 18:27:27 GMT -5
Very stupid.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 6:07:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2010 18:30:08 GMT -5
That is really stupid. ESPECIALLY for California.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheNinthCloud on Mar 24, 2010 18:37:16 GMT -5
I agree. Stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Mar 24, 2010 18:50:22 GMT -5
Being a hooker/hiring a hooker in the first place is just dumb.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 6:07:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2010 19:58:57 GMT -5
Being a hooker/hiring a hooker in the first place is just dumb. sometimes when your poor and living on the streets you gotta do what you gotta do |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Mar 24, 2010 20:00:11 GMT -5
 ing dumb and unconstitutional. Seriously, prostituition is the oldest form of work. |
|
|
|
Post by sullygrunt on Mar 24, 2010 20:16:40 GMT -5
Thats stupid as hell.
|
|
|
|
Post by spreedom8 on Mar 24, 2010 20:22:41 GMT -5
It should absolutely be considered an illegal sex act (which it is in every state but Nevada I believe) so I fully support this law.
"Unconstitutional" -- seriously? I'd love to hear an explanation behind that ridiculous angle...
|
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Mar 24, 2010 20:23:03 GMT -5
Ridiculous.
|
|
PdW2kX
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 8, 2007 23:34:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,551
|
Post by PdW2kX on Mar 24, 2010 20:25:04 GMT -5
I'm not pro-prostitution in any way, shape, or form...but being a registered sex offender is absolute overkill for hiring a prostitute. Just the term "sex offender" immediately brings up sick child molesting perverts that are better off castrated.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 24, 2010 20:27:27 GMT -5
That is really stupid. ESPECIALLY for California. If I remember, he doesn't really live where he says he does so CA didn't try to pass this stupid law. I agree that prostitution is bad but not bad enought to be put on a sex offender list if the lady is 18+. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Mar 24, 2010 21:20:33 GMT -5
That's not right
|
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Mar 24, 2010 21:23:45 GMT -5
Prostitution shouldn't be illegal, so yeah; it doesn't surprise me that they're trying even HARDER to make the people involved look bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Mar 24, 2010 21:24:45 GMT -5
Being a hooker/hiring a hooker in the first place is just dumb. sometimes when your poor and living on the streets you gotta do what you gotta do They can try getting an actual job. I'd rob a bank before I become a hooker. |
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Mar 24, 2010 21:45:16 GMT -5
sometimes when your poor and living on the streets you gotta do what you gotta do They can try getting an actual job. I'd rob a bank before I become a hooker. Wow, I actually agree with you. While I think that sex offenders deserve to be in a class of their own, I definately think that a law such as this isn't all that bad. Maybe give them some other registered title. Sex offender is a bit overkill tbh. I'm not sure people understand the types of diseases that are spread about by prostitutes who wouldn't give a **** if you got a life threatening virus. They're spread to those horny husbands who just need to bust a nut, and those husbands spread it to their innocent wives. There's nothing constitutional about spreading STDs around your local city. |
|
NAЯDO
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 9, 2010 6:48:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,308
|
Post by NAЯDO on Mar 24, 2010 22:00:18 GMT -5
this is absolutely nuts. period.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 24, 2010 22:05:10 GMT -5
They can try getting an actual job. I'd rob a bank before I become a hooker. Wow, I actually agree with you. While I think that sex offenders deserve to be in a class of their own, I definately think that a law such as this isn't all that bad. Maybe give them some other registered title. Sex offender is a bit overkill tbh. I'm not sure people understand the types of diseases that are spread about by prostitutes who wouldn't give a **** if you got a life threatening virus. They're spread to those horny husbands who just need to bust a nut, and those husbands spread it to their innocent wives. There's nothing constitutional about spreading STDs around your local city. Regulate it, make sure all acts are safe, require testing for prostitutes and charge for it. We could be making millions and maybe even more than that if we set up a program that allows these men and women to work in a safe environment and regulate the hell out of it. |
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 24, 2010 22:10:07 GMT -5
It should absolutely be considered an illegal sex act (which it is in every state but Nevada I believe) so I fully support this law. "Unconstitutional" -- seriously? I'd love to hear an explanation behind that ridiculous angle... Fine. Let's say for the sake of argument that we agree that prostitution should be illegal. Do you not think it's a little overkill to call someone a sex offender for hiring a hooker? Seriously? One consenting adult paying another consenting adult for sex is not even remotely like kid touching. |
|
