|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 25, 2010 7:22:55 GMT -5
I'm serious. We could pay these people depending on how much they take in and it will be like commission. And they can collect tips as well. It would stop the spread of disease as well. I can sorta see where your coming from, but you can understand my doubt in it, right? I mean, condoms are only 99% effective, and if prostitution was legalized, with the vast amounts of dudes trying to "score themselves some poontang" that would kind of a hectic situation. Prostitution has been legal in Nevada for decades. You don't see chaos and mayhem there as men try to buy a piece of tail. It's still going to be shunned socially which is perfectly fine. |
|
|
|
Post by spreedom8 on Mar 25, 2010 9:03:45 GMT -5
In a vacuum, I agree that this is ridiculous, but in reality the fact is that prostitution is illegal nearly everywhere in America, and with that being the case, it is an illegal sex act so you absolutely deserve to be registered as a sex offender. By definition, that's exactly what you are.
However, I also agree that legalizing prostitution is a very good idea. That would allow you to control it very carefully and would eliminate many of the dangers involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 25, 2010 16:25:18 GMT -5
That's not the point. If I told you Slappy was a registered sex offender you don't think, "He hired a hooker." You think, "He's a kid toucher." That's a big difference. Kid touchers should all die horrible, painful deaths. People who hire hookers, I couldn't care less about. If you want to fine them and toss them in jail because it's illegal, whatever. Don't brand them as kid touchers though.
|
|
|
|
Post by spreedom8 on Mar 25, 2010 16:27:25 GMT -5
That's not the point. If I told you Slappy was a registered sex offender you don't think, "He hired a hooker." You think, "He's a kid toucher." That's a big difference. Kid touchers should all die horrible, painful deaths. People who hire hookers, I couldn't care less about. If you want to fine them and toss them in jail because it's illegal, whatever. Don't brand them as kid touchers though. Not if the law was passed -- it would redefine the term. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Mar 25, 2010 16:27:36 GMT -5
"Sex offender" doesn't have to do with kids. I mean, it CAN have to do with kids... But if you rape an of-age woman, you're still a sex offender.
|
|
|
|
Post by Oskanowski on Mar 25, 2010 16:28:39 GMT -5
A sex offender (also sexual offender, sex abuser, or sexual abuser) is a person, who committed a sex crime.
It can mean anything/be anyway. If you committed a sex crime, you're a sex offender.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lewscher on Mar 25, 2010 16:29:34 GMT -5
if you wanna go  then why the hell cant you  you both agree to it who gives a crap:-/ of course people will make money off it it why make it illegal  |
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Mar 25, 2010 16:30:13 GMT -5
Slappy's idea of regulating prostitution is much like Jesse Ventura's idea. Its not a new concept. If the govt. was to regulate it, they could tax it. It would solve many economical issues.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 25, 2010 16:39:25 GMT -5
Honestly, it doesn't make any sense. If a hot chick walks into a bar and yells, "Who wants to have sex with me?" and then does every single guy who raises their hand, it's ok. Nothing illegal is happening as long as everyone is an adult. If she walks into a bar and tells some guy, "Give me $50 and I'll have sex with you," that's a crime.
|
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Mar 25, 2010 16:43:08 GMT -5
To paraphrase George Carlin... "Selling is legal..... ing is legal.....why is selling ing illegal?" |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 25, 2010 23:13:38 GMT -5
That's not the point. If I told you Slappy was a registered sex offender you don't think, "He hired a hooker." You think, "He's a kid toucher." That's a big difference. Kid touchers should all die horrible, painful deaths. People who hire hookers, I couldn't care less about. If you want to fine them and toss them in jail because it's illegal, whatever. Don't brand them as kid touchers though. Not if the law was passed -- it would redefine the term. Not in people's minds. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Mar 25, 2010 23:17:38 GMT -5
It should absolutely be considered an illegal sex act (which it is in every state but Nevada I believe) so I fully support this law. Fantastic, a Bush supporter. Why exactly should prostitution be illegal? What your actual reasons behind this? Do you have absolutely any facts to back up your conclusion that prostitution should be illegal, or could it be the more likely situation of you yourself disliking prostitution and thus, by the very nature of all selfish people, selfishly believe law should follow suit with your philosophies? Yeah, that sounds a little more probable. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Mar 25, 2010 23:21:53 GMT -5
sometimes when your poor and living on the streets you gotta do what you gotta do They can try getting an actual job. I'd rob a bank before I become a hooker. So stealing is better than prostitution? Let me make that more specific... You are saying that stealing, the act of taking what is not yours from someone who more than likely earned what was in-fact theirs, is better than for someone to get paid to consent to the literally the very act that our bodies are designed to do to continue our species? Wow. That's a level of stupid I can hardly fathom. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Mar 25, 2010 23:23:57 GMT -5
I'm not sure people understand the types of diseases that are spread about by prostitutes who wouldn't give a **** if you got a life threatening virus. They're spread to those horny husbands who just need to bust a nut, and those husbands spread it to their innocent wives. There's nothing constitutional about spreading STDs around your local city. Actually there's nothing unconstitutional about spreading STD's around your local city either. The constitution guarantees you many freedoms, the freedom to not have crabs isn't one of them. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 25, 2010 23:26:18 GMT -5
I'm not sure people understand the types of diseases that are spread about by prostitutes who wouldn't give a **** if you got a life threatening virus. They're spread to those horny husbands who just need to bust a nut, and those husbands spread it to their innocent wives. There's nothing constitutional about spreading STDs around your local city. Actually there's nothing unconstitutional about spreading STD's around your local city either. The constitution guarantees you many freedoms, the freedom to not have crabs isn't one of them. For HIV at least, it is illegal to spread the disease if you knowingly spread the disease and don't tell your partner that you have it. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Mar 25, 2010 23:28:34 GMT -5
If you dont like it, don't hire a hooker, wats the problem? In that case, let's make drinking water a felony. If you don't like the punishment for that crime, just don't drink water. What's the problem there? Or vegetables, those can be harmful. Class A felony. Got a problem, just don't eat 'em. What's the problem? This freedom of speech thing can be really annoying, let's make that illegal too. Don't like it, don't speak. What's the problem? The point of course is that forcing people to adhere to laws that are ridiculous and a result of narrow-minded, white men who hate women is f*cking intellectually- disabled. |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Mar 25, 2010 23:41:57 GMT -5
It should absolutely be considered an illegal sex act (which it is in every state but Nevada I believe) so I fully support this law. Fantastic, a Bush supporter. Why exactly should prostitution be illegal? What your actual reasons behind this? Do you have absolutely any facts to back up your conclusion that prostitution should be illegal, or could it be the more likely situation of you yourself disliking prostitution and thus, by the very nature of all selfish people, selfishly believe law should follow suit with your philosophies? Yeah, that sounds a little more probable. In a vacuum, I agree that this is ridiculous, but in reality the fact is that prostitution is illegal nearly everywhere in America, and with that being the case, it is an illegal sex act so you absolutely deserve to be registered as a sex offender. By definition, that's exactly what you are. However, I also agree that legalizing prostitution is a very good idea. That would allow you to control it very carefully and would eliminate many of the dangers involved. |
|
|
|
Post by Swarm on Mar 25, 2010 23:42:46 GMT -5
Actually there's nothing unconstitutional about spreading STD's around your local city either. The constitution guarantees you many freedoms, the freedom to not have crabs isn't one of them. For HIV at least, it is illegal to spread the disease if you knowingly spread the disease and don't tell your partner that you have it. To a large extent that's true, albeit legally that's still somewhat of a grey area when you actually check the stats on convictions (I believe it's somewhere in the area of 1/6th of "willful exposure" type cases end up with convictions). Even with that, however, that's not really a prostitution issue, that's a sex-in-general issue so to use that as an example against prostitution is kind of singling out a small part of a much larger issue. |
|
|
|
Post by spreedom8 on Mar 26, 2010 14:20:03 GMT -5
It should absolutely be considered an illegal sex act (which it is in every state but Nevada I believe) so I fully support this law. Fantastic, a Bush supporter.  |
|
|
|
Post by spreedom8 on Mar 26, 2010 14:20:22 GMT -5
Not if the law was passed -- it would redefine the term. Not in people's minds. I can't control what people think.... |
|
