|
Post by Smash Ventura on Jul 29, 2010 9:50:41 GMT -5
how am i fooling myself? i like jakks and dont like the mattel bodies? pretty simple concept...
the whole "Jakks has put out nothing but garbage" is a opinion not a fact...
but to each there own.
hard to miss out on great figures when i already have great figures;)
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 10:12:16 GMT -5
how am i fooling myself? i like jakks and dont like the mattel bodies? pretty simple concept... the whole "Jakks has put out nothing but garbage" is a opinion not a fact... but to each there own. hard to miss out on great figures when i already have great figures;) No, it's pretty much a fact that Jakks is garbage. I would liken it to your girlfriend, one you really love and supported for roughly 7 years, breaking up with you after approximately 18 months of things "not being the same"...and then you see her 4 months later with a doctor on a yacht. Also, this "Danielson is the best ever!" stuff saddens me. If we were back in 1998 when wrestling was awesome, Austin would have stunned that midget (who'd be playing a security guard) out of the ring in 10 seconds! Lol, too bad Danielson is a better wrestler than Austin. And saying "If this was 1998, blah, blah, blah" is intellectually- disabled.
|
|
|
Post by "Original Broski" jonjon535353 on Jul 29, 2010 10:40:06 GMT -5
how am i fooling myself? i like jakks and dont like the mattel bodies? pretty simple concept... the whole "Jakks has put out nothing but garbage" is a opinion not a fact... but to each there own. hard to miss out on great figures when i already have great figures;) No, it's pretty much a fact that Jakks is garbage. I would liken it to your girlfriend, one you really love and supported for roughly 7 years, breaking up with you after approximately 18 months of things "not being the same"...and then you see her 4 months later with a doctor on a yacht. Also, this "Danielson is the best ever!" stuff saddens me. If we were back in 1998 when wrestling was awesome, Austin would have stunned that midget (who'd be playing a security guard) out of the ring in 10 seconds! Lol, too bad Danielson is a better wrestler than Austin. And saying "If this was 1998, blah, blah, blah" is intellectually- disabled. Danielson would prolly admit that he'll never be as big as Austin, and Austin would prolly admit that he was never the wretler Danielson is. Austin ain't full of himself, and Danielson respects the businesses past.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 10:47:58 GMT -5
No, it's pretty much a fact that Jakks is garbage. Lol, too bad Danielson is a better wrestler than Austin. And saying "If this was 1998, blah, blah, blah" is intellectually- disabled. Danielson would prolly admit that he'll never be as big as Austin, and Austin would prolly admit that he was never the wretler Danielson is. Austin ain't full of himself, and Danielson respects the businesses past. Well said Now if only Jakks would admit that they suck and that Mattel is the superior toy company.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jul 1, 2024 10:02:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 11:49:45 GMT -5
Steve Austin was a better wrestler than Danielson. Mat wrestling doesn't equal the whole package.
|
|
|
Post by Smash Ventura on Jul 29, 2010 15:58:49 GMT -5
Danielson would prolly admit that he'll never be as big as Austin, and Austin would prolly admit that he was never the wretler Danielson is. Austin ain't full of himself, and Danielson respects the businesses past. Well said Now if only Jakks would admit that they suck and that Mattel is the superior toy company. Mega - yawn.... clearly the confusion between personal opinion and fact is blurred... i know it sucks when not everyone changes there likes and dislikes on a dime like most people these days... oh well not gonna get dragged into another load of gaga...
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jul 29, 2010 16:09:19 GMT -5
Steve Austin was a better wrestler than Danielson. Mat wrestling doesn't equal the whole package. Then in what way was he a better? Because if actually being a better wrestler doesn't make you a better...uhhh... wrestler, then what does? Selling 200,000,000 t-shirts? Selling out massive arenas? Being able to get a crowd excited for the show? If that's the case, then I have bad news for you...Michael Jackson was a better wrestler than Stone Cold AND Bryan Danielson. Or...or is it...Stone Cold was a better entertainer than Danielson? Hmmmmm...'rubs chin'
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jul 29, 2010 16:10:24 GMT -5
Danielson would prolly admit that he'll never be as big as Austin, and Austin would prolly admit that he was never the wretler Danielson is. Austin ain't full of himself, and Danielson respects the businesses past. Well said Now if only Jakks would admit that they suck and that Mattel is the superior toy company. ![](http://gallery.webwhitenoise.com/albums/userpics/beating-a-dead-horse.gif) Seriously dude, you dont like them. You think they're garbage. Thats fine that is YOUR opinion and you're entitled to it but clearly you're doing nothing but going from post to post in a Jakks board and starting/continuing arguments. Just go to the Mattel board and talk about the figures you like and let the rest of the world enjoy what they want.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jul 1, 2024 10:02:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2010 16:57:42 GMT -5
Austin was an outstanding work rate wrestler until the broken neck, and even after the broken neck when he changed his style up he was delivering 5 star matches, MOTY candidates, feuds of the year, and took the WWF back to the top. He's better than Danielson, just stop.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jul 29, 2010 20:08:40 GMT -5
Why would you not buy Mattel? JAKKs don't even come close in quality however you want to measure it ![???](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/huh.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Gamechanger on Jul 29, 2010 20:15:07 GMT -5
Austin was an outstanding work rate wrestler until the broken neck, and even after the broken neck when he changed his style up he was delivering 5 star matches, MOTY candidates, feuds of the year, and took the WWF back to the top. He's better than Danielson, just stop. There's no point arguing. Anyone with sense knows that Austin was better than Bryan. But that's not going to convince a bunch of kids who just believe whatever the dirt sheets and ROH forums tell them.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 21:44:00 GMT -5
Well said Now if only Jakks would admit that they suck and that Mattel is the superior toy company. ![](http://gallery.webwhitenoise.com/albums/userpics/beating-a-dead-horse.gif) Seriously dude, you dont like them. You think they're garbage. Thats fine that is YOUR opinion and you're entitled to it but clearly you're doing nothing but going from post to post in a Jakks board and starting/continuing arguments. Just go to the Mattel board and talk about the figures you like and let the rest of the world enjoy what they want. I'm sorry but I just really hate Jakks. I'm not trying to instigate any fights or anything, I just really hate Jakks so much that I bash them any chance I get because I'm truly disgusted by their figures. I really can't understand why people are still loyal to a toy company that has continued to produce terrible figures. If you find my comments about a toy company that upsetting, then I don't know what to say about that. I'm not trying to start anything, I just really, REALLY hate Jakks, and feel as though I have every right in the world to voice my opinion about them.
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Jul 29, 2010 22:26:08 GMT -5
Austin was an outstanding work rate wrestler until the broken neck, and even after the broken neck when he changed his style up he was delivering 5 star matches, MOTY candidates, feuds of the year, and took the WWF back to the top. He's better than Danielson, just stop. There's no point arguing. Anyone with sense knows that Austin was better than Bryan. But that's not going to convince a bunch of kids who just believe whatever the dirt sheets and ROH forums tell them. Having a different opinion makes me a simple minded kid who buys into what dirt sheets tell me? So in turn does saying things like that make you an elitist prick who buys into his own over-hyped, limited knowledge of wrestling?
|
|
|
Post by purplekangaroo on Jul 29, 2010 22:41:25 GMT -5
It's called a difference in opinion, boys. Get over it.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 23:03:27 GMT -5
Austin was an outstanding work rate wrestler until the broken neck, and even after the broken neck when he changed his style up he was delivering 5 star matches, MOTY candidates, feuds of the year, and took the WWF back to the top. He's better than Danielson, just stop. No
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 23:05:40 GMT -5
Steve Austin was a better wrestler than Danielson. Mat wrestling doesn't equal the whole package. Are you serious? Danielson does a lot more than mat wrestling. In fact he does more wrestling moves then Austin. Hence why's the better wrestler.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Jul 29, 2010 23:09:29 GMT -5
Austin was an outstanding work rate wrestler until the broken neck, and even after the broken neck when he changed his style up he was delivering 5 star matches, MOTY candidates, feuds of the year, and took the WWF back to the top. He's better than Danielson, just stop. There's no point arguing. Anyone with sense knows that Austin was better than Bryan. But that's not going to convince a bunch of kids who just believe whatever the dirt sheets and ROH forums tell them. That's a really dumb statement. I like Danielson better, because of his ability to entertain and put on good matches. It's what I see with my own two eyes, saying that it's because I listen to the dirt sheets or ROH forums (that I don't even go to) is a bit ridiculous. I like Danielson better than Austin, you don't, that's fine. Neither of us is right, our opinions just differ.
|
|
|
Post by Calcifer Boheme on Jul 29, 2010 23:37:54 GMT -5
As someone who was a Jakks fan since 96, I do think Mattel has done an amazing job so far. They are a toy company that ha been around for more than 50 year, they obviously know what they're doing.
sadly, TNA isn't winning my favor with the TNA line so far. I want to like it, but it's just not impressive in my opinion. I will be getting Sting and a few select LotR figures, but certainly will not be an avid collector anymore.
I will also say, though, that stating which is better as being fact is ridiculous. While there may be facts that support your side, the statement is still opinion. My Opinion is that Mattel is better, but I can respect people who disagree.
|
|
|
Post by Smash Ventura on Jul 29, 2010 23:40:39 GMT -5
As someone who was a Jakks fan since 96, I do think Mattel has done an amazing job so far. They are a toy company that ha been around for more than 50 year, they obviously know what they're doing. sadly, TNA isn't winning my favor with the TNA line so far. I want to like it, but it's just not impressive in my opinion. I will be getting Sting and a few select LotR figures, but certainly will not be an avid collector anymore. I will also say, though, that stating which is better as being fact is ridiculous. While there may be facts that support your side, the statement is still opinion. My Opinion is that Mattel is better, but I can respect people who disagree. very well put and karma for you... my opinoon is i like my jakks ra cs collection but i can very much respect your view here... would be great if everyone could be like this guy. karma for you ![:)](http://www.wrestlingfigs.com/images/smiley.gif)
|
|
Obi-TruLove
Main Eventer
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Joined on: Jul 23, 2010 13:20:40 GMT -5
Posts: 1,938
|
Post by Obi-TruLove on Jul 29, 2010 23:56:59 GMT -5
I actually really like TNA figures, but I also love the WWE Elite and Legends figures. But I got to give props too Jakks for continuing to make good figures.
|
|