|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Oct 7, 2010 16:18:18 GMT -5
That beard is great. Respect it.
|
|
PrideFcF
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 7, 2008 13:26:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,807
|
Post by PrideFcF on Oct 7, 2010 17:10:31 GMT -5
scary with a horrible beard? LOL Forgive this man, god, for he knows not what he speaks of. The beard is amazing. If he comes into the fight looking like Evan Tanner did against Kendal Grove, Cain should just tap out on the spot without being provoked. |
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Oct 7, 2010 17:12:49 GMT -5
I will second that notion. The beard is life.
|
|
|
|
Post by ville on Oct 7, 2010 23:10:50 GMT -5
The beard cancels out the tattoo of a dick on his chest. That's how awesome it truly is.
|
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on Oct 8, 2010 1:35:16 GMT -5
I never understood why people get on his ass about the sword tattoo on his chest..if a dick is the first thing you think of when you see that then I think that says more about you then it does about Brock...
I'm be more understanding if people made fun of him for his tramp stamp instead of the sword...
|
|
PrideFcF
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 7, 2008 13:26:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,807
|
Post by PrideFcF on Oct 8, 2010 1:41:35 GMT -5
I definitely agree on the chest tattoo. When I see it I just see a stupid looking dagger, and not a dick attached to a handle. Not sure where that joke started, but it's always baffled me.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Oct 8, 2010 2:08:08 GMT -5
It's a cock, so screw you guys.
|
|
the hell demon
Main Eventer
i must possess all, or i possess nothing
Joined on: Nov 16, 2006 12:48:46 GMT -5
Posts: 3,592
|
Post by the hell demon on Oct 8, 2010 2:56:49 GMT -5
Not gonna lie, Lesnar has a pretty sweet viking beard going on.
I'm now growing my beard out in honor of Brocktober.
War Velasquez!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Oct 8, 2010 23:34:33 GMT -5
|
|
PrideFcF
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 7, 2008 13:26:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,807
|
Post by PrideFcF on Oct 8, 2010 23:45:35 GMT -5
I give Cain's beard a -3 out of 100 on the Dude Power scale. Step ya' game up, Cain. Step it up.
Totally random, but this reminds me that I have no clue what the hell Bateman looks like. Isn't that pic from the same gym he trains at?
|
|
|
|
Post by ville on Oct 8, 2010 23:47:18 GMT -5
Kinda good Machida is training with Wrestlers, I can see Rampage trying to get this to the ground. And by "kinda" I mean good for Machida but bad for Rampage since I want Rampage to win.
|
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on Oct 9, 2010 0:50:43 GMT -5
Machida looks so different now with his tooth fixed..he should have left it as is..
|
|
|
|
Post by terraryzing on Oct 17, 2010 13:13:13 GMT -5
Brock is gonna smash Cain regardless.
|
|
|
|
Post by ville on Oct 17, 2010 15:49:09 GMT -5
Lesnar is so overrated its starting to sicken me.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Oct 17, 2010 15:54:29 GMT -5
Lesnar's sh*tty striking defense/offense already got exposed in his last fight, so I don't know why there is such a love for him here. I think he's pretty good, but relatively untested. He still has people to beat before he is considered "the best", but he is the champion
|
|
|
|
Post by ville on Oct 17, 2010 16:06:47 GMT -5
Lesnar's sh*tty striking defense/offense already got exposed in his last fight, so I don't know why there is such a love for him here. I think he's pretty good, but relatively untested. He still has people to beat before he is considered "the best", but he is the champion |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Oct 17, 2010 16:13:33 GMT -5
i feel that velasquez will have more composure than carwin did with lesnar, and that is what will seperate the two. carwin had brock rocked and didn't know how to properly finish and wasted his energy, leading to his body 'shutting down' in the second. i don't see cain making this mistake, so as long as lesnar doesn't pull out a surprise of his own, i think this one is cain's.
|
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Oct 17, 2010 16:18:27 GMT -5
Lesnar's sh*tty striking defense/offense already got exposed in his last fight, so I don't know why there is such a love for him here. I think he's pretty good, but relatively untested. He still has people to beat before he is considered "the best", but he is the champion We get it, you think Lesnar is an over rated wrestler. I love when people use college wrestling credentials when trying to compare wrestlers. The translation from freestyle/greco roman wrestling into MMA isn't the end all - be all. It's a nice start point for many MMA fighters, but just because you were a division 1A superstar, doesn't mean you're a better wrestler than the guy you're standing across from who didn't rise above JUCO levels. You can see this in many wrestlers who try to make the move to MMA. (see: Jake Rosholt; who I still think will have a good career, but has been outwrestled by others with credentials that don't even touch his accomplishments) Obviously Lesnar's size plays a lot into his wrestling, but he's also very smart and knows how to use that size. You also don't credit his agility when speaking about him EVER. This is a guy that walks between 290-310 (if not more on given days) that moves like a Welterweight. That agility makes him very dangerous on the ground. People that are saying "He's the best wrestler in MMA" are yes, stretching it a bit. To say his wrestling is over rated though, is just someone trying to downplay his strength with no real basis at all. His striking has a lot of holes, and he obviously has a lot of work to do in his stand up defense (and learning a sweep from his back wouldn't be a bad idea) ...but don't discredit his biggest strength just because he's "big." It's drawing straws when trying to rationalize your "opinion" that just doesn't make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by ville on Oct 17, 2010 16:29:44 GMT -5
We all know his Striking is **** but even his Wrestling is overrated, its all his size, even when he was Wrestling in school, he said he always had a size advantage over his opponents but his fans can't admit it. His fans make him out like he has the best Wrestling in MMA and he is so strong that his Striking is good but in reality he sucks. If he was Cains size he wouldn't be ****. Just my opinion though. We get it, you think Lesnar is an over rated wrestler. I love when people use college wrestling credentials when trying to compare wrestlers. The translation from freestyle/greco roman wrestling into MMA isn't the end all - be all. It's a nice start point for many MMA fighters, but just because you were a division 1A superstar, doesn't mean you're a better wrestler than the guy you're standing across from who didn't rise above JUCO levels. You can see this in many wrestlers who try to make the move to MMA. (see: Jake Rosholt; who I still think will have a good career, but has been outwrestled by others with credentials that don't even touch his accomplishments) Obviously Lesnar's size plays a lot into his wrestling, but he's also very smart and knows how to use that size. You also don't credit his agility when speaking about him EVER. This is a guy that walks between 290-310 (if not more on given days) that moves like a Welterweight. That agility makes him very dangerous on the ground. People that are saying "He's the best wrestler in MMA" are yes, stretching it a bit. To say his wrestling is over rated though, is just someone trying to downplay his strength with no real basis at all. His striking has a lot of holes, and he obviously has a lot of work to do in his stand up defense (and learning a sweep from his back wouldn't be a bad idea) ...but don't discredit his biggest strength just because he's "big." It's drawing straws when trying to rationalize your "opinion" that just doesn't make sense. |
|
DWright
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 7, 2005 18:30:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,839
|
Post by DWright on Oct 17, 2010 17:22:52 GMT -5
We get it, you think Lesnar is an over rated wrestler. I love when people use college wrestling credentials when trying to compare wrestlers. The translation from freestyle/greco roman wrestling into MMA isn't the end all - be all. It's a nice start point for many MMA fighters, but just because you were a division 1A superstar, doesn't mean you're a better wrestler than the guy you're standing across from who didn't rise above JUCO levels. You can see this in many wrestlers who try to make the move to MMA. (see: Jake Rosholt; who I still think will have a good career, but has been outwrestled by others with credentials that don't even touch his accomplishments) Obviously Lesnar's size plays a lot into his wrestling, but he's also very smart and knows how to use that size. You also don't credit his agility when speaking about him EVER. This is a guy that walks between 290-310 (if not more on given days) that moves like a Welterweight. That agility makes him very dangerous on the ground. People that are saying "He's the best wrestler in MMA" are yes, stretching it a bit. To say his wrestling is over rated though, is just someone trying to downplay his strength with no real basis at all. His striking has a lot of holes, and he obviously has a lot of work to do in his stand up defense (and learning a sweep from his back wouldn't be a bad idea) ...but don't discredit his biggest strength just because he's "big." It's drawing straws when trying to rationalize your "opinion" that just doesn't make sense. So his god given abilities and talent win him fights...got it. That sure sounds odd, no? Now I know why small, slow and weak people lose so many fights. |
|
