K Dot
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 5, 2005 10:06:08 GMT -5
Posts: 1,771
|
Post by K Dot on Mar 29, 2011 2:04:32 GMT -5
The last 2 minutes of a close game also lasts a good 30 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 29, 2011 12:13:22 GMT -5
Honestly i can't stand watching baseball. It takes to long and is to slow. That is one of the things like about football. 40 second clock you gotta get the play off and back into the huddle. Also there is timed quarters. Yet at the end of the day, both games take 2-3 hours to play. |
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Mar 29, 2011 13:37:16 GMT -5
But I don't fall asleep watching 2-3 hours worth of football. So to each their own?
With how detail-laced and depressing all this CBA and antitrust and lawsuit discussions........am I the only one who's missing the simplicity of Favre-Watch?
yeah......I probably am.
|
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Mar 29, 2011 15:59:13 GMT -5
Since you're already in town, why not stay for a bit Chad? I mean, Cassel could always use someone not named Bowe to throw to.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 29, 2011 19:47:56 GMT -5
But I don't fall asleep watching 2-3 hours worth of football. So to each their own? Fair enough as long as we can agree that soccer sucks.  |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Mar 29, 2011 19:50:35 GMT -5
I would rather staple my sack to a bench than have to sit through an entire baseball OR soccer game.
|
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Mar 30, 2011 12:23:08 GMT -5
I was just messing around on youtube and no matter how much I see this, I'm still amazed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cult Member BriGuy on Mar 30, 2011 21:22:32 GMT -5
beast mode activated
|
|
|
|
Post by BV on Mar 30, 2011 21:45:49 GMT -5
thanks for the reminder of that run
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Mar 30, 2011 22:15:48 GMT -5
I would rather staple my sack to a bench than have to sit through an entire baseball OR soccer game. Clearly you do not appreciate the beauty of watching men play chess at 90 mphy. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 9:49:26 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2011 7:56:41 GMT -5
I was just messing around on youtube and no matter how much I see this, I'm still amazed. I prefer this version. |
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Apr 2, 2011 13:36:03 GMT -5
#HOLDMADIIIIIIIIIIIIICK
|
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Apr 2, 2011 14:35:33 GMT -5
 , he sounds like a friend of mine. Like...seriously. Haha. |
|
AONI
Superstar
Joined on: Jul 8, 2008 22:10:17 GMT -5
Posts: 563
|
Post by AONI on Apr 4, 2011 19:14:16 GMT -5
CAR-1: Marcel Dareus
DEN-2: Patrick Peterson
BUF-3: Cam Newton
CIN-4: AJ Green
AZ-5: Von Miller
CLE-6: Robert Quinn
SF-7: Cameron Jordan
TEN-8: Nick Fairley
DAL-9: Tyron Smith
WAS-10: Blaine Gabbert
HOU-11: Prince Amukamara
MIN-12: DaQuan Bowers
DET-13: Nate Solder
STL-14: Julio Jones
MIA-15: Mark Ingram
JAX-16: Aldon Smith
NE-17: JJ Watt
SD-18: Cam Heyward
NYG-19: Mike Pouncey
TB-20: Ryan Kerrigan
KC-21: Anthony Castonzo
IND-22: Corey Liuget
PHI-23: Gabe Carimi
NO-24: Adrian Clayborn
SEA-25: Jake Locker
BAL-26: Titus Young
ATL-27: Kyle Rudolph
NE-28: Akeem Ayers
CHI-29: Marvin Austin
NYJ-30: Muhammed Wilkerson
PIT-31: Danny Watkins
GB-32: Brooks Reed
|
|
|
|
Post by Jean-Ralphio on Apr 4, 2011 19:27:01 GMT -5
I have no problem with Ingram at 28, or 33 but I am going to be PISSED if they take him with their first pick.
Patriots have rushers that can get to the QB, we are probably in the Super Bowl this year. Not another RB!
|
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Apr 4, 2011 21:01:36 GMT -5
Why would Miami select another DE? Its not really much of a need.
Ayers seems like an ILB in a 3-4. Why would KC take a ILB when that part of there team is pretty good? A NT, OLB, or even WR are far bigger needs.
Can't see Indy not select an o-lineman.
Don't see how Austin fits NYJ's defense.
I would prefer Reed to the Ravens, but wouldn't be angry with Smith.
Where is Justin Houston??
|
|
AONI
Superstar
Joined on: Jul 8, 2008 22:10:17 GMT -5
Posts: 563
|
Post by AONI on Apr 5, 2011 2:10:24 GMT -5
Why would Miami select another DE? Its not really much of a need. Ayers seems like an ILB in a 3-4. Why would KC take a ILB when that part of there team is pretty good? A NT, OLB, or even WR are far bigger needs. Can't see Indy not select an o-lineman. Don't see how Austin fits NYJ's defense. I would prefer Reed to the Ravens, but wouldn't be angry with Smith. Where is Justin Houston?? maybe i shouldve left a disclaimer saying that im no expert nor trying to be one, lol is randy starks an impact player? i personally dont think so. LBs, check. CBs, check. Ss, nobody available worthy of the 15th pick. you take Jordan because Odrick + Soliai + Jordan= more sacks for your OLBs. that DL will give the AFC North fits. w Ayers...im just guessing your saying hes an 34 ILB because he ran a slow 40 (and i could be totally wrong on that). but i dont think Vrabel is much of a blazer either. plus, its been confirmed he's visited with KC already, so the interest is there. IND gave up the least amount of sacks and the 2nd least amount of QB hits, it isnt a 1st RD need. of course, they did have issues w injuries, but that can wait until later rounds. take Liuget because ha can legitimize that D by providing pressure in passing situations and occupying gaps against the run. Austin to NYJ because he seems to be the off field type of player theyd take. also, hes worked his way to the 1st RD. besides off field issues he is an amazing talent. the physical aspects of his game are there in spades. mentally is the problem, except NYJ have shown they dont seem to mind too much about that. why exactly would OLB be a need for BAL? it was not pressure that lost them that game against PIT. they have a problem at CB and have ignored it for a good half of the last decade. and if im not mistaken, their new DC was last year's secondary coach...he'll know the importance of a good backside to complement the front 7. Houston can go to NE, GB, KC, or even NYJ. but i dont hear his name rising...i only see him in mocks. |
|
Jamal
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 24, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
Posts: 4,877
|
Post by Jamal on Apr 5, 2011 11:23:47 GMT -5
Why would Miami select another DE? Its not really much of a need. Ayers seems like an ILB in a 3-4. Why would KC take a ILB when that part of there team is pretty good? A NT, OLB, or even WR are far bigger needs. Can't see Indy not select an o-lineman. Don't see how Austin fits NYJ's defense. I would prefer Reed to the Ravens, but wouldn't be angry with Smith. Where is Justin Houston?? maybe i shouldve left a disclaimer saying that im no expert nor trying to be one, lol is randy starks an impact player? i personally dont think so. LBs, check. CBs, check. Ss, nobody available worthy of the 15th pick. you take Jordan because Odrick + Soliai + Jordan= more sacks for your OLBs. that DL will give the AFC North fits. w Ayers...im just guessing your saying hes an 34 ILB because he ran a slow 40 (and i could be totally wrong on that). but i dont think Vrabel is much of a blazer either. plus, its been confirmed he's visited with KC already, so the interest is there. IND gave up the least amount of sacks and the 2nd least amount of QB hits, it isnt a 1st RD need. of course, they did have issues w injuries, but that can wait until later rounds. take Liuget because ha can legitimize that D by providing pressure in passing situations and occupying gaps against the run. Austin to NYJ because he seems to be the off field type of player theyd take. also, hes worked his way to the 1st RD. besides off field issues he is an amazing talent. the physical aspects of his game are there in spades. mentally is the problem, except NYJ have shown they dont seem to mind too much about that. why exactly would OLB be a need for BAL? it was not pressure that lost them that game against PIT. they have a problem at CB and have ignored it for a good half of the last decade. and if im not mistaken, their new DC was last year's secondary coach...he'll know the importance of a good backside to complement the front 7. Houston can go to NE, GB, KC, or even NYJ. but i dont hear his name rising...i only see him in mocks. If KC is looking for an OLB with a 1st round pick, it really would make no sense for them to take Ayers over someone like Houston or Reed. I really don't think hes a good enough pass-rusher to play 3-4 OLB imo. Starks isn't a huge impact player, but not many 3-4 DE's are. He looked pretty good last year to me, and hes only 27. Langford was also solid last year. Not great, but hes only 25, and has good potential. Not to mention Odrick was their 1st rounder last year, and will be back healthy. Their D was very good last year. If anything they need to go on the offensive side of the ball. RB, O-lineman, or even a QB if they don't believe in Henne. You can't look at stats like that when you have Manning as your QB. A lot of INT's came because of pressure. Manning will rarely get sacked due his extra quick releases, but the shaky o-line was a big reason he struggled. The d could use an upgrade DT, but the team lives and dies with Manning. Why not give the guy some protection? Again, I don't see how Austin fits into NYJ's 3-4 D. Hes not big enough to play NT, and isn't a good enough pass-rusher to play DE. His best fit seems like 4-3 DT to me. How has Baltimore ignored the CB position? They had C-Mac and Rolle for a good part of the decade. Maybe the last 3 years they haven't invested quite enough, but for the decade? I don't think so. The Ravens were in the bottom half of the league in terms of sacks. Other than Suggs, there isn't really a pass-rusher on the team. (Ngata is more of a pocket collapser) I agree that we definitely could use a #1 CB, but Carr, Wilson, and Foxworth would be a pretty good duo provided with an adequate pass-rush. And the loss to the Steelers had a lot to do with the pass-rush as well. Sure that 50 yarder stands out, but when the pass-rush was working, the secondary looked pretty damn good. Pitt double teamed Suggs in the 2nd, and it totally eliminated any sort of pass-rush, putting the CB's in a tough position. Houston is one of the better pass-rusher in the draft. Really don't see him making it out of the 1st. |
|
|
|
Post by johnnypoopypants on Apr 5, 2011 12:37:31 GMT -5
Panthers are sold on Newton. He's the pick if they go QB.
|
|
AONI
Superstar
Joined on: Jul 8, 2008 22:10:17 GMT -5
Posts: 563
|
Post by AONI on Apr 5, 2011 13:08:06 GMT -5
out of Reed, Houston, and Ayers, only Ayers has been to KC to work out. its not much in measuring interest but it is something.
is there a RB, QB, or OL that DESERVES the 15th? no. you take the DE because thats the only position where the pick matches the level of that players skill.
and as youve said, IND lives and dies w Manning. why not try to take a little pressure off of him by giving him a better defense? do they have issues at the OL position? sure, but just as with MIA, is there an OT deserving of a 1st RD pick after the top 4 OTs? i dont know enough to say so.
Austin isnt a perfect fit for NY but he's stupid talented. and not every 34 end has to be the protypical guy. look at Glenn Dorsey. and even Mike Devito plays DE sometimes for NY. size can be overlooked if the player has a good motor and enough skill.
the last CB BAL took? '99, McAlister. before him in '98, Duane Starks. they NEED to take a CB if they want to win a SB because not only does their talent at that postion lack depth, they are tremendously injury prone as well. Kindle will be back next year to fill that OLB anyway
|
|
