|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 21, 2011 13:47:13 GMT -5
There is no way that 19% of people support someone who isn't running.
|
|
|
Post by chillax on Dec 21, 2011 13:58:41 GMT -5
I want to know, what does all your arguing accomplish? Nobody ever changes their mind here. They just come back and yell some more.
I think Ron Paul has no chance in hell of winning - and honestly, I kind of think that's a good thing.
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Dec 21, 2011 14:08:05 GMT -5
Anyone other than Mitt Romney plz AAAAAANNNNNNYOOOOOOOONEEEEEE?
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Dec 21, 2011 14:12:17 GMT -5
They're not actually supporting someone who's not running, they just want someone else to give their support to, because they don't like the current field. That's how I took it at least.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 21, 2011 14:15:07 GMT -5
I want to know, what does all your arguing accomplish? Nobody ever changes their mind here. They just come back and yell some more. I think Ron Paul has no chance in hell of winning - and honestly, I kind of think that's a good thing. Ask Slappy who he supported in 2008. Now ask him who he supports in 2012.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 21, 2011 14:16:22 GMT -5
They're not actually supporting someone who's not running, they just want someone else to give their support to, because they don't like the current field. That's how I took it at least. That doesn't make any sense whatsoever, I'm sorry... There's no way that 1/5 people are waiting for someone else to join the race. No other poll indicates anything close to that. AAAAAANNNNNNYOOOOOOOONEEEEEE? If we were voting for "most likely to be on 'Dateline: To Catch A Predator," I would select Santorum without a second thought.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 21, 2011 14:18:59 GMT -5
I want to know, what does all your arguing accomplish? Nobody ever changes their mind here. They just come back and yell some more. I think Ron Paul has no chance in hell of winning - and honestly, I kind of think that's a good thing. Ask Slappy who he supported in 2008. Now ask him who he supports in 2012. Yeah, ask me.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Dec 21, 2011 14:22:36 GMT -5
Why have we been discussing this for like 10 posts? I didn't have anything to do with this poll, I have no idea if it's accurate, and for all I know they could just be sexing up "undecided" to make the poll seem more interesting. I just wanted to point out that "someone else" didn't mean Ron Paul. That's all.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 21, 2011 14:33:27 GMT -5
Why have we been discussing this for like 10 posts? I didn't have anything to do with this poll, I have no idea if it's accurate, and for all I know they could just be sexing up "undecided" to make the poll seem more interesting. I just wanted to point out that "someone else" didn't mean Ron Paul. That's all. I'm just saying that I don't think their numbers are accurate. Honestly, it makes more sense for the third person to be Ron Paul than it does "someone else."
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Dec 21, 2011 14:35:48 GMT -5
AAAAAANNNNNNYOOOOOOOONEEEEEE? If we were voting for "most likely to be on 'Dateline: To Catch A Predator," I would select Santorum without a second thought. Surprisingly I would go with Newt Gingrinch or Herman Cain. They give these "I would anything" vibes off.
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 21, 2011 18:25:14 GMT -5
it. I'm writing in "Harvey Dent" again this year.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Dec 21, 2011 19:23:09 GMT -5
I'm writing in Santa Claus. He has deep pockets and loves to give stuff away for nothing.
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 21, 2011 21:57:24 GMT -5
I'm writing in Santa Claus. He has deep pockets and loves to give stuff away for nothing. Sounds like Ben Bernanke.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Dec 22, 2011 9:50:20 GMT -5
Now of course they're starting to bring up the old newsletters again, can't believe they didn't bring them up sooner. Morons.
|
|
|
Post by Hulkamaniac on Dec 22, 2011 10:39:51 GMT -5
Santa is not without his flaws. There are rumors that he is flagrantly violating the Children's Online Privacy Act and tracking children under the age of thirteen for purposes of determining their toy preferences. Allegedly he is spying on these children as well and assembling naughty and nice lists based on their behaviors. It's quite scandalous. There are also rumors of possible exploitation of elf labor as well. There really are no perfect candidates out there.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 22, 2011 13:19:44 GMT -5
Santa is not without his flaws. There are rumors that he is flagrantly violating the Children's Online Privacy Act and tracking children under the age of thirteen for purposes of determining their toy preferences. Allegedly he is spying on these children as well and assembling naughty and nice lists based on their behaviors. It's quite scandalous. There are also rumors of possible exploitation of elf labor as well. There really are no perfect candidates out there. What a PIECE OF SHIT.
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 22, 2011 14:55:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on Dec 22, 2011 18:00:55 GMT -5
LoL, the butt-hurt is strong with this one...
Gingrich: Ron Paul's base is "people who want to legalize drugs"Despite his mantra to stay "positive," Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich took a swipe at rival Ron Paul on Thursday, suggesting that the Texas congressman's political base consists of "people who want to legalize drugs." During a radio interview with conservative commentator John McCaslin, the former House speaker also said Paul is naive about the war on terrorism and Iran's nuclear program. "This is a guy who basically says, if the United States were only nice, it wouldn't have had 9/11. He doesn't want to blame the bad guys. ... He dismisses the danger of Iranian nuclear weapon and seems to be indifferent to the idea that Israel could be wiped out. And as I said, I think the key to his volunteer base is people who want to legalize drugs." Paul has grown in strength in recent polls in Iowa and is threatening Gingrich's ability to merge from the state's Jan. 3 GOP caucuses as the clear-cut conservative alternative to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. Both Paul and Romney have unleashed a barrage of negative ads against Gingrich in the first caucus state, prompting Gingrich to challenge Romney to go one-on-one with him in a debate. "I'm happy taking the heat, why doesn't he join me in the kitchen?" Gingrich said on Fox News late Wednesday, referring to Romney's quip that his rival should get out of the kitchen if he can't stand the heat of critical ads. Gingrich called on Romney to join him for a 90-minute debate, a shorter engagement than the three-hour "Lincoln-Douglas" style debates he has touted for several weeks now. Gingrich said Romney should call an end to the negative ad campaign being financed by a super PAC that supports his candidacy. Romney has said he has no control over the PAC, which under law must be separate from his campaign. "This is Romney's former staff running a PAC being funded by Romney's millionaire friends," Gingrich told interviewer Greta Van Susteren. "He could turn them around in two hours and announce that he's look at the ads, he's found them to be unacceptable and he wants to run a positive campaign. These ads are destructive and irresponsible." In the radio interview Thursday, Gingrich was once again forced to confront questions about the $1.6 million he collected doing what he describes as consulting work for the mortgage giant Freddie Mac. He has defended the work in the past as a non-lobbying role in which he provided key strategic advice to the quasi-governmental mortgage entity. Taking a different tack on Thursday, Gingrich sought to downplay the amount of money that actually made it into his pocket. " ... The money went to a company that had offices in three cities," he said. "The amount that came to me was very tiny. I thought it was a legitimate service to a legitimate company."
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 22, 2011 18:10:06 GMT -5
So Gingrich wants to execute Ron Paul's base? Gingrich said in 1997 that marijuana users should be executed.
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Dec 22, 2011 19:56:10 GMT -5
Mr. Speaker, I believe you're becoming a little too out of touch with this issue.
|
|