Why are people so harsh about WWE?

No one is ever happy here, you'll get used to it. Welcome!

it's got it's good and it's bads. for better or for worse, wrestling fans love to criticize and comment.

i personally think there are huge problems in wwe...and the wrestling industry.

The biggest problems are with the bad writing, nonsensical storylines, storylines with giant plot holes, bad comedy that isn't funny, and forgetting about storylines and stipulations from one show to the next.

It takes more than blood and smashing Ryback through tables twice to make a good product.

It's mostly a combination of WWE becoming less exciting when the attitude era got old, and then the Internet becoming more accessible at the same time and people getting brainwashed by dirtsheet writers who have anti-WWE agendas.

Basically, people logged onto wrestling sites because they were wrestling fans. Then at the same time all the sites were saying "WWE sucks, Vince is evil, needs more cruiserweights, wrestling shouldn't have storylines or characters" etc etc, wrestling was becoming a bit duller. The novelty of the attitude era format was wearing off. And kids started thinking "Hey, maybe this website guy is right and the reason I don't enjoy wrestling as much anymore IS because I love cruiserweights and evil HHH holds them down!"

People on the Internet are so harsh about WWE because the Internet made them that way.

It's not even even trying to figure out every minor detail, even the bigger ones don't make any sense. Why does it matter if AJ is having an affair with John Cena? She resigned as GM, that's the end of it.

If it's been established that being in the WWE has been AJ's dream since she was a child, why wouldn't Vicky just fire her?

Why was the storyline between CM Punk and Mick Foley completely dropped after the second week?

What's the deal with Kane and Daniel Bryan? Are the heels? Are the faces? Do they like each other? Do they hate each other?

I do agree about the Punk/Foley angle. Wtf happend there? Did they see that everyone was mad that the title wouldn't be on the line at a major ppv so they hurried and changed it?

And I think that's the thing with Team Hell No. You decide for yourself. Paint them how you like to view them. It's not 1992 anymore. There doesn't have to be guys that are a clear cut heel or face.

If you haven't found even one flaw with WWE current product in the age, you must be a mindless drone. That's why a far majority find flaw with the way WWE approaches certain storyline, feuds, plot holes, promos etc. Without any form of criticism it would just be plain weird to see everyone agree with everyone's standpoint on specific topics. In other words, we all ball straight call at some point.

As someone who does not like the WWE product simply because it's aimed at an age significantly younger than I am it's not that the talent in ring is terrible.

The roster now is very rich with talent who just isn't being featured or pushed in ways that would get them over. Talent like Dolph Ziggler, Miz, Punk, Danielson, Curt Hawkins, Del Rio, Cody Rhodes, etc. are all very good in ring talents. However, the writing and lack of creativity in addition to the very poor kid aimed angles they run hurt the product.

The other major problem I've encountered personally is there's just too much wrestling. 3 hours of Raw, 2 for Smackdown, 2 hours from Main Event & Saturday Morning Slam, & one PPV a month is entirely too much wrestling and crosses the board of overkill.

When the Network comes into play, there will be a lot of attention from older fans like myself away from the current product which will hurt WWE even more than they realize.

There's no quick fix or factual way to change things. It's just a combination of everything at once that has led to a lot of the negativity, the perfect storm if you will.