|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Aug 12, 2013 13:42:07 GMT -5
I'm dying to get just the slightest bit of footage from DotFP. It's been a long time since I've been this excited for a movie.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Aug 12, 2013 14:25:29 GMT -5
The GOTG footage looked great, I'm extremely confident in Gunn.
Seen the DotFP footage but honestly, I don't care for the fox's X-men franchise one bit, it's let me know since the beginning.
|
|
|
Post by el torro on Aug 12, 2013 14:52:54 GMT -5
Those clips look awesome! Thanks for sharing.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Aug 12, 2013 17:54:16 GMT -5
Having finally seen all the leaked footage, I am genuinely excited for all things Marvel Studios, but especially Guardians Of The Galaxy. In James Gunn I trust! At least it looks like they're back on track with every other movie after the abysmal Iron Man 3!
The X-Men DOFP video did nothing for me at all, Fox let us down beginning with X-Men & trying to salvage, save, change & retcon things from X-1, X-2, X-3 & Wolverine Origins just shows that Fox have never, ever had a clue from the beginning & Bryan Singer just boils my absolute P*ss!!!!! Lets not use comic book material or have the actors / actresses aloud to read comics to somewhat get a feel for their characters they are portraying.
Halle Berry as Storm....... F*ck Off!
Kelsey Grammer as Beast though was excellent casting, when he spoke I felt like it was Beast from the 90's cartoon. Shame that was the only best & decent thing to come out of X-3.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Aug 12, 2013 23:18:49 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2013 23:26:55 GMT -5
Both movies looks awesome. I feel the X-Men movies get way too much hate.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Aug 12, 2013 23:47:04 GMT -5
I don't, they've been the biggest letdowns for me outside of Marvel's own films. They're just as bad as Elektra, DD, F4, and Spidey for me.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Aug 13, 2013 1:08:39 GMT -5
I don't, they've been the biggest letdowns for me outside of Marvel's own films. They're just as bad as Elektra, DD, F4, and Spidey for me. Exactly! Noticed who has the most flaws from most Marvel properties released...... Oh yeah, Fox & Sony, Fox more so though. Marvel Studios isn't perfect either as obviously we can't deny the changes to their movies, BUT, at least theirs all make sense & have perfect reasoning, like calling Captain America the First Avenger even though he wasn't, or the Avengers line up not being the original line up to start with, things like that, but all things that can be justified. Marvel Studios IMO only has one stinker of a film to date & that is Iron Man 3. As long as that is their one & only let down I'm cool with that. But Fox & Sony have far more let downs & flaws with their Marvel Properties that can be ridiculed & picked apart more so than Marvel Studios which is why they & their films both get so much hate.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Aug 13, 2013 2:06:19 GMT -5
Natalie Portman has hinted at there being a Thor 3.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Aug 13, 2013 3:00:27 GMT -5
Natalie Portman has hinted at there being a Thor 3. Cap, Thor & Avengers were always scheduled for 3rd movies. Evans is contracted for 6 films (3 Cap, 3 Avengers), although they originally wanted him to sign on for 9 films. Hopefully after his contract ends he'll still want to stay & hopefully they'll bump his pay, I like Evans as Cap. Hemsworth has the same deal (3 Thors, 3 Avengers). I wonder if Natalie will be in the mood to do the 3rd one seeing as she wasn't really interested in coming back for Thor 2 but Thanks to pulling her on her contractual obligation to which she signed up for got her back. I think / hope Marvel do that with Hugo Weaving too for the Red Skull, his deal was for 2 or 3 films yet he doesn't want to play the Red Skull again, which is a shame because I loved his portrayal so much & think he nailed it really well so was disappointing in hearing he didn't want to play the role again. These actors & actresses that Marvel have interest in KNOW what they're getting into from the start before putting Pen to Paper, if you don't think you can do 3, 6, 9 or however many movies Marvel Studios is asking you to, don't sign the contract.
|
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Aug 13, 2013 3:12:02 GMT -5
Natalie Portman has hinted at there being a Thor 3. Cap, Thor & Avengers were always scheduled for 3rd movies. Evans is contracted for 6 films (3 Cap, 3 Avengers), although they originally wanted him to sign on for 9 films. Hopefully after his contract ends he'll still want to stay & hopefully they'll bump his pay, I like Evans as Cap. Hemsworth has the same deal (3 Thors, 3 Avengers). I wonder if Natalie will be in the mood to do the 3rd one seeing as she wasn't really interested in coming back for Thor 2 but Thanks to pulling her on her contractual obligation to which she signed up for got her back. I think / hope Marvel do that with Hugo Weaving too for the Red Skull, his deal was for 2 or 3 films yet he doesn't want to play the Red Skull again, which is a shame because I loved his portrayal so much & think he nailed it really well so was disappointing in hearing he didn't want to play the role again. These actors & actresses that Marvel have interest in KNOW what they're getting into from the start before putting Pen to Paper, if you don't think you can do 3, 6, 9 or however many movies Marvel Studios is asking you to, don't sign the contract. Also, Hiddleston, Jackson and ScarJo are all attached to 9 movie contracts. I believe Weaving stated earlier this year that he came to an agreement with Marvel and that the two settled on just having the one appearance.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Aug 13, 2013 11:32:30 GMT -5
I'll admit that the X-Men movies didn't really live up to my expectations concerning my favorite team of super heroes, but First Class was an incredible movie and I have faith the Days of the Future Past will be even better and will hopefully right all the wrongs of the other previous films.
First Class and The Wolverine were very good movies that leads me to believe they're finally getting the X-Men franchise back on track. I'll be pretty devastated if they blow it with DotFP, but the way it's shaping up, I don't think that will be the case.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2013 5:38:03 GMT -5
I have enjoyed all the X-Men movies aside from XMO:Wolverine and parts of X3.
on the topic of Marvel Studios changing things for the movies.....that doesnt bother me at all.the movies are their own universe-just like 616,AOA or any of the others.so the changes dont annoy me at all.
also if Guy Pearce had about 3 more lines of dialogue when he was revealing all to Stark there wouldnt be as much moaning about the Mandarin either.I was very suprised Black let such an obvious opportunity slip.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Aug 14, 2013 9:46:33 GMT -5
I have enjoyed all the X-Men movies aside from XMO:Wolverine and parts of X3. on the topic of Marvel Studios changing things for the movies.....that doesnt bother me at all.the movies are their own universe-just like 616,AOA or any of the others.so the changes dont annoy me at all. also if Guy Pearce had about 3 more lines of dialogue when he was revealing all to Stark there wouldnt be as much moaning about the Mandarin either.I was very suprised Black let such an obvious opportunity slip.Can you expand on that? I'm wondering what (else) you would have had him say.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Aug 14, 2013 10:25:18 GMT -5
I have enjoyed all the X-Men movies aside from XMO:Wolverine and parts of X3. on the topic of Marvel Studios changing things for the movies.....that doesnt bother me at all.the movies are their own universe-just like 616,AOA or any of the others.so the changes dont annoy me at all. I don't mind changes IF & WHEN it makes sense or if it suits the purpose. The Mandarin twist was unnecessary IMO. It didn't have to be the Fu Manchu Mandarin look or have the 10 Magic Rings, far from it, but the Terrorist interpretation that we thought they were going with & the look Kingsley had was PERFECT! Everything was spot on with him, so why not just leave him as The Mandarin & established to the audience as a Terrorist, that's it. I feel it was a waste & a joke of Kingsley's acting ability & pointless having him in the film. They may has well have just not done the Mandarin character at all. Also, even if you ignore the Mandarin twist, the film was still very poor regardless of the Mandarin twist being the main thing being picked apart. As I said, I don't mind changes, but there are changes & then there are what I like to call taking liberties & I think Shane Black & Drew Pearce took far too many liberties & bastardised a lot of things. For a start, changes made to Mya that weren't necessary. Killian being made a main villain when he had nothing more than 2 panels in the comic before blowing his head off. Granted, that can't be done on film, but I don't even know why they used Killian as a main character anyways when he wasn't even in the Extremis story that long anyways, again, pointless use of a character & pointless use of Guy Pearce. Also, his reasoning for becoming a villain & wanting to get back at Tony.............. He was left on a Fuc*ing roof! Really, that's the motivation for becoming a whacked out villain, that just seems like lazy writing & a cop out with no thought process what so ever. Hardly any of Tony in any of the Iron Man armours for more than 5 minutes of a 2 hour plus movie. Most of the armours broke so easily! When a Mark 6 or 7 can take a beating, lightening bolts & few rounds with Thor but any suits higher than that can smash or break so easily where is the logic & thought process in that. I get that the Mark 42 was supposed to be unfinished which is fair enough, but Marks 8 - 41 were all fully functional armours that got destroyed easily, sorry, but I just don't buy that. Far too much comedy & used & inserted at all the wrong times & moments, none of it feeling natural & just coming across as forced. Shane should leave the comedy scenes to Joss as he knows when to time it & use it at the correct moment, Shane just used it willy nilly at all the incorrect moments throughout the film. Like I say, it doesn't have to be very comic book accurate & changes can be made, but make them make sense & make it believable, don't just change things for the sake of it. Just so much of this movie irked me, LOL. Hopefully this is Marvel Studios first, last & one & only stinker to come out. And I never want to see Shane Black or Drew Pearce Directing or Writing on another Marvel Studios film ever again!
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Aug 14, 2013 10:42:28 GMT -5
I'm not at all an Iron Man comics student, to start out with, so I didn't mind the twist with the Mandarin. I actually thought it was pretty brilliant, given how the movie was marketed. All of the previews and commercials had the Mandarin as the big villain in the movie (and barely featured Pearce at all) and when you get to the actual movie, Pearce is the real villain. It was a VERY well-kept secret. Surprised no one blew the lid on that before it came out.
|
|
rvd_mr_ppv
Main Eventer
Courage, Honor, Loyalty, Sacrifice. You're braver than you think.
Joined on: Sept 1, 2002 11:20:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,600
|
Post by rvd_mr_ppv on Aug 14, 2013 11:33:05 GMT -5
I'm not at all an Iron Man comics student, to start out with, so I didn't mind the twist with the Mandarin. I actually thought it was pretty brilliant, given how the movie was marketed. All of the previews and commercials had the Mandarin as the big villain in the movie (and barely featured Pearce at all) and when you get to the actual movie, Pearce is the real villain. It was a VERY well-kept secret. Surprised no one blew the lid on that before it came out. It's more the general audience / non comic book readers that seem to enjoy the twist & that's because that demo has know prior knowledge going into the film. I think if they did, they wouldn't have liked or enjoyed it as much & would have the same WTF reaction as most of us comic readers. I felt the marketing was misleading IMO, the ads made the movie look absolutely epic, but what was delivered in the final product, well, wasn't so much. The secret actually released after the first international release somewhere, a website had a Top 10 Spoiler Article up given away the 10 biggest things from the film, me not being a one to be bothered by spoilers read it & when I read the Mandarin twist, I knew it was more than likely going to go downhill from there & from my point of view after viewing the film, that article didn't disappoint unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by RAC on Aug 14, 2013 13:06:25 GMT -5
I don't know, I'm one of the comic book fans that really enjoyed Black's & Fiege's take on Mandarin (Killian). I've read mandarian through the years I liked the movie's take on him.
|
|
Jacob
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: May 15, 2006 14:11:26 GMT -5
Posts: 16,577
|
Post by Jacob on Aug 14, 2013 15:26:45 GMT -5
I don't know, I'm one of the comic book fans that really enjoyed Black's & Fiege's take on Mandarin (Killian). I've read mandarian through the years I liked the movie's take on him. I have to say, I didn't like it simply for the fact that I was hoping Kingsley's Mandarin would be dark and twisted, the way he was portrayed for most of the movie. I also think that the real Mandarin was taken down too easily, considering he is one of Iron Man's biggest foe. Can you imagine the uproar if something like this had been done with Loki?! It was a nice touch to the movie, though. It gave it the kick that I think it needed. I've only seen it once in the cinema, so I'll rewatch it again when it's out on Blu Ray and hopefully grow to like it a little more.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 5:33:28 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2013 18:11:17 GMT -5
I have enjoyed all the X-Men movies aside from XMO:Wolverine and parts of X3. on the topic of Marvel Studios changing things for the movies.....that doesnt bother me at all.the movies are their own universe-just like 616,AOA or any of the others.so the changes dont annoy me at all. also if Guy Pearce had about 3 more lines of dialogue when he was revealing all to Stark there wouldnt be as much moaning about the Mandarin either.I was very suprised Black let such an obvious opportunity slip.Can you expand on that? I'm wondering what (else) you would have had him say. I said this before someplace(maybe it was here)but I would have had him explain 1)he was in fact The Mandarin(I know this is implied but I wanted him to say it.I I have missed it and he did,pul me over-its all good. 2)He was in league with Stane behind the scenes in IM1 and that they were his people who took Stark in Afghanistan.when Stane took control of Stark Industries and killed Tony he would simply have eliminated him in time. 3)he hit pause on his retaliation for Stanes betrayal after Tonys "I am IM" press conference because he need to take stock & review the situation.....this particularly after what he witnessed in Monaco and at the Stark Fair.. yknow just something like that to tie things up.
|
|