|
Post by LtD73 on Jul 25, 2013 17:22:26 GMT -5
The only major things that I see there being left to do with the contracts are
Cash in at Wrestlemania Cash in a full year later Champion successfully, cleanly retaining against a cash in.
What have you guys wanted to see done with the contracts that haven't been done yet?
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Jul 25, 2013 17:28:31 GMT -5
The two "Mr. Money In The Bank"s swapping brief cases?
Or a tag team winning both cases?
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jul 25, 2013 17:40:48 GMT -5
I'm really so sick of the gimmick. It was cool at first, but in the long run has hurt more guys than it's helped. Cena winning last year was pointless, Ziggler went onto lose the title in his first defense and they botched his whole push, Miz just sucked and Del Rio's cash-in killed all the momentum Punk had two summers ago. The last real good title reign to come from it was probably Kane.
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Jul 25, 2013 17:41:06 GMT -5
Off top of my head
- Having the contract holder lose clean - Cashing in at WRESTLEMANIA - Cashing in a full year later - Personally I think it would be cool if whoever held the contract left for a while, storyline injury or whatever, then returns unexpected and cashes in. - Contract holder also wins royal rumble or title shot and cashes in for two title shots in the same night. - Calls out the champion immediately following the MITB ladder match
Honestly I think they should do away with the concept in 3-4 years and either bring in a new concept that grants you a title shot or bring back King of the Ring in its place. MITB has been around for almost 10 years now, it's starting to run its course IMO.
|
|
|
Post by adzy on Jul 25, 2013 17:51:13 GMT -5
If the champ and MITB holder were both in a survivor series match it would be pretty cool if they just cashed in halfway through the match, it should just be 1 case then U could create something a bit more surprising
|
|
|
Post by ASR (therockisback) on Jul 25, 2013 18:01:46 GMT -5
I actually am a big fan of the MITB concept. Yes Miz does suck (Hes alright these days since hes not main eventing WM) but you gotta admit that the MITB gimmick helped Miz big time. Without MITB I doubt we would have saw Del Rio's quick rise to the top. I also doubt Punk would of won the WHT in 08 without the MITB briefcase. We also got the start of Punk's epic heel run because of his second MITB cash in. Cena winning was pointless. Kane's was good. Swagger's was meh. Edge's was probably the best. MITB also could have helped Kennedy had he not gotten injured. RVD got the biggest push of his career because of his successful MITB cash in. MITB saved Bryan's career as it seemed like he was going nowhere. MITB is also building up Sandow's young career and finally the MITB has now put Orton back on track and will possibly lead to a needed heel turn.
Seeing 12/16 guys a year bust their asses and stealing the show in Ladder matches just to earn a shot at the WWE/WHT actually makes the Titles seem prestigious again. What I do want is for the E to get rid of the concept of cashing in at anytime. I think cashing in RVD style should be the only way to cash in. This will put the MITB holder over HUGE by beating the Champion in a fair match instead of a cheap win. Imagine a heel Sandow cashing in his contract in advanced on a face Champion and winning cleanly? That would be a star born right there.
|
|
|
Post by MacReady on Jul 25, 2013 18:09:02 GMT -5
Somehow, someone winning both the Raw and Smackdown case.
It'd never happen, but ti'd be pretty cool to see them toy with the opportunity at both belts.
|
|
|
Post by Kanenite on Jul 25, 2013 18:40:12 GMT -5
Somehow, someone winning both the Raw and Smackdown case. It'd never happen, but ti'd be pretty cool to see them toy with the opportunity at both belts. Or the World Heavyweight Champion getting the WWE title briefcase, cashing in, and winning and unifying the two titles.
Also works vice versa regarding the titles and/or with the Superstar winning the WHC after winning the WWE title briefcase, then eventually winning the WWE tittle too and vice/versa.
|
|
Barney Stinson
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 5, 2011 18:42:24 GMT -5
Posts: 979
|
Post by Barney Stinson on Jul 25, 2013 18:49:39 GMT -5
I'd like to see a scenario like this unfold. For example. Let's just say for argument's sake Cody Rhodes beats Del Rio for the WHC. He knows Sandow is coming for him. He has a rematch with Del Rio and while doing the Beautiful Disaster kick, Cody "pretends to blow out his knee". He gets the pin on Del Rio, but lays on the mat "in pain". Sandow comes out to cash in and the bell rings, but Cody can't get up. Sandow goes to pick him up and Cody rolls him in a cradle ala Diesel/Bret Hart Survivor Series 95 and gets the pin, then shows Sandow he was fine all along. The champ outsmarts the MITB holder and the irony of Sandow getting outsmarted would be funny too.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:10:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2013 18:53:23 GMT -5
Both MITB holders cashing in on the same night would be cool in my opinion.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Jul 25, 2013 19:01:01 GMT -5
I think Ziggler teased it at the Rumble earlier this year: have someone win MITB (like he did), enter the Rumble and win. Win their World Title Match at WrestleMania and then cash in on the other world title the same night to become the Undisputed World Champion.
|
|
billthomson1984
Main Eventer
May Bill Rest in Peace, Wfigs Community
Joined on: Jun 17, 2012 8:27:35 GMT -5
Posts: 2,242
|
Post by billthomson1984 on Jul 25, 2013 19:15:51 GMT -5
I kinda like the idea of it being stolen and cashed in by someone else.
|
|
|
Post by clifford on Jul 25, 2013 19:18:48 GMT -5
I'd like to see one of these scenarios:
MITB Winner wins the Royal Rumble, Fights for WWE title @ Wrestlemania, loses first match, then cashes in and wins the second match. OR MITB Winner wins the Royal Rumble, wins the WWE Title @ Wrestlemania, then has both the WWE title and MITB case at the same time. Eventually, they lose the title at another PPV, but cash in right after to regain the title. This would be good for a heel beating a babyface everyone has been dying to see win the belt (similar to Punk cashing in on Jeff Hardy)
|
|
Dat guy ova der
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
Dah What?
Joined on: May 16, 2005 19:43:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,085
|
Post by Dat guy ova der on Jul 25, 2013 19:44:04 GMT -5
I think Ziggler teased it at the Rumble earlier this year: have someone win MITB (like he did), enter the Rumble and win. Win their World Title Match at WrestleMania and then cash in on the other world title the same night to become the Undisputed World Champion. Either this, or have them hold their contract for themselves as an insurance policy of sorts so that they get 2 rematches for the title if they lose (one is just normal WWE routine, one with the contract).
|
|
Dante, The Voc
Main Eventer
If I'm not online, I'm on the toilet
Joined on: Dec 5, 2010 9:48:02 GMT -5
Posts: 1,374
|
Post by Dante, The Voc on Jul 25, 2013 19:49:03 GMT -5
Maybe the MiTB holder gets a legit shot at the title, loses the match but cashes in for a second attempt and wins.
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Jul 25, 2013 20:04:43 GMT -5
I want to see a Money in the Bank match as the main event of a PPV and immediately following the match, the winner gets on the mic and calls out the champion and cashes in. Gives a heck of an effort but comes up short.
Another concept would be for someone to win the Money in the Bank match, then win the Royal Rumble. They are granted a title shot at Wrestlemania, they lose, but cash in the MITB after losing and pick up the win.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:10:44 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2013 20:13:37 GMT -5
I'd like to see it just go back to being a WrestleMania match, having two briefcases every year is getting to be abit much.
|
|
Doctor Worm
Main Eventer
They Call me Doctor Worm, Good morning, How're you? I'm Dr.Worm.
Joined on: Aug 2, 2006 8:04:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,261
|
Post by Doctor Worm on Jul 25, 2013 21:00:08 GMT -5
A cash-in in the middle of a match.
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jul 25, 2013 21:25:17 GMT -5
I'd like to see it just go back to being a WrestleMania match, having two briefcases every year is getting to be abit much. I totally agree
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Jul 25, 2013 22:38:10 GMT -5
a cash-in on a cash-in... if both of the briefcases could be cashed in for either title.
|
|