|
|
Post by JC Motors on Dec 20, 2013 10:56:43 GMT -5
Reality TV ruined society Definitely reposting for emphasis, however it's society's fault for allowing it. True. I am appalled that honey Boo Boo, The Kardashians, Kate Gosselein, The Bachelor/Bachelorette/ Dance Moms and every other staged show keeps getting renewed for more seasons |
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Dec 20, 2013 11:00:36 GMT -5
He has the right to say what he wants. People have the right to be offended. People have the right to defend him. A&E has the right to fire/suspend him or the show. People have the right to boycott the channel.
I just think it's silly that so many people are getting bent out of shape over what this particular guy has to say about the subject, and I don't even agree with the guy at all or particularly like him or his show.
I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape when people who don't matter say or do things that are stupid.
|
|
jeffro2000
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 16, 2011 14:23:29 GMT -5
Posts: 1,858
|
Post by jeffro2000 on Dec 20, 2013 11:36:00 GMT -5
He has the right to say what he wants. People have the right to be offended. People have the right to defend him. A&E has the right to fire/suspend him or the show. People have the right to boycott the channel. I just think it's silly that so many people are getting bent out of shape over what this particular guy has to say about the subject, and I don't even agree with the guy at all or particularly like him or his show. I don't understand why people get so bent out of shape when people who don't matter say or do things that are stupid. That is my biggest thing about it. Who cares what one guy has to say about the subject. Are his views going to change anything? Of course not. He can say what he wants, people can be mad at him, people can defend him, and life moves on. Duck Commander goes on, A&E and the show should go on, and people who want to watch can watch. Those who want to boycott can. I doubt it will make a difference really. What he said shouldn't surprise anyone. If someone was watching this show thinking hey "I bet this guy loves homosexuals", then they got some comprehension problems. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 20, 2013 17:20:18 GMT -5
We are not animals. I am sorry you consider yourself to be a monkey. Let's look at YOUR logic though. There are many many many Dinosaur bones. Museums are filled with them. How come there are NO such fossils of a transistion of monkey to man? Since in the mounds of earth they would be on top of dinosaur bones, there would be MANY MANY more of these types of bones than of dinosaurs found. Yet there ARE none. Therefore, logically speaking, there is no proof of humans evolving from monkeys. Therefore we are not animals. Oh, and people DO have a choice on who they have sex with. Homos do not HAVE do to it. Therefore what I said stands. It is a choice. We didn't evolve from monkeys. We have a common link. Homosexuality has nothing to do with who you have sex with. It is about attraction. You can have sex with women but feel attracted to men. So who you have sex with is a choice, who you are attracted to is not. And since homosexuality is about attraction and not sex, homosexuality is not a choice. |
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Dec 20, 2013 17:32:37 GMT -5
We are not animals. I am sorry you consider yourself to be a monkey. Let's look at YOUR logic though. There are many many many Dinosaur bones. Museums are filled with them. How come there are NO such fossils of a transistion of monkey to man? Since in the mounds of earth they would be on top of dinosaur bones, there would be MANY MANY more of these types of bones than of dinosaurs found. Yet there ARE none. Therefore, logically speaking, there is no proof of humans evolving from monkeys. Therefore we are not animals. Oh, and people DO have a choice on who they have sex with. Homos do not HAVE do to it. Therefore what I said stands. It is a choice. Your ignorance is truly astounding. We didn't evolve from monkeys, they are our cousins that evolved from the same ancient mammal ancestor that we did. And people choose who they want to have sex with but not who they are attracted to. HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A CHOICE! What makes you such an expert on human psychology? Please, tell me. Claiming homosexuality is a choice is such an ignorant statement that it isn't even funny. Now let's look at YOUR logic. Oh wait... There isn't any. And I reported you for your use of the word "homo". That's incredibly inappropriate and ignorant. |
|
spydermonkey
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Aug 12, 2012 13:12:04 GMT -5
Posts: 145
|
Post by spydermonkey on Dec 20, 2013 17:36:47 GMT -5
GLAAD wants all gay and lesbian couples to be treated equally, the same rights as Straight couples. Some people like you, some people don't. Welcome to Equality!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 14:14:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 20, 2013 19:42:40 GMT -5
We are not animals. I am sorry you consider yourself to be a monkey. Let's look at YOUR logic though. There are many many many Dinosaur bones. Museums are filled with them. How come there are NO such fossils of a transistion of monkey to man? Since in the mounds of earth they would be on top of dinosaur bones, there would be MANY MANY more of these types of bones than of dinosaurs found. Yet there ARE none. Therefore, logically speaking, there is no proof of humans evolving from monkeys. Therefore we are not animals. Oh, and people DO have a choice on who they have sex with. Homos do not HAVE do to it. Therefore what I said stands. It is a choice. Your ignorance is truly astounding. We didn't evolve from monkeys, they are our cousins that evolved from the same ancient mammal ancestor that we did. And people choose who they want to have sex with but not who they are attracted to. HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT A CHOICE! What makes you such an expert on human psychology? Please, tell me. Claiming homosexuality is a choice is such an ignorant statement that it isn't even funny. Now let's look at YOUR logic. Oh wait... There isn't any. And I reported you for your use of the word "homo". That's incredibly inappropriate and ignorant. Um...Homo is SHORT for homosexual. There is nothing to report about here. Just like RAG would be short for Ragnorak.... Picky much? But that is what liberals do when they lose arguments. They decide to shut down the debate. Adios RAG! |
|
