|
|
Post by The Dazzler on Jan 26, 2014 19:35:21 GMT -5
The figure gods have heard us! Would prefer a 18x18 or 20x20 ring, but this is just as good! Finally WickedCoolToys make something decent!
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 26, 2014 19:38:24 GMT -5
YESSSSSSSSSSS
|
|
|
|
Post by Colter on Jan 26, 2014 19:40:34 GMT -5
Sweet.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jan 26, 2014 19:59:16 GMT -5
Well in my beliefs there is so. |
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Jan 26, 2014 20:01:02 GMT -5
I'll buy it, if the posts aren't plastic. One thing I can't stand is turnbuckle posts sagging in. I fixed the mat on my basic ring to not be "springloaded", so if it were bigger it would be perfect due to the posts not sagging. Hopefully they do what Mattel do with their posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Jan 26, 2014 20:11:50 GMT -5
is Mattel losing the license? I hope not. I'd ball. |
|
|
|
Post by naparo01 on Jan 26, 2014 20:15:05 GMT -5
This is exciting news. I do have to express my discontent about the Ring size.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan88 on Jan 26, 2014 20:15:53 GMT -5
Be nice to see pics but if it's just a cheaper RSR i think i'll pass.. Could be tempted if it is a Smackdown ring however, just says WWE and no mention of which ring skirts.
|
|
Jamie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 14, 2013 15:54:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,380
|
Post by Jamie on Jan 26, 2014 20:39:17 GMT -5
OH HELL YES!
|
|
China Claus
Main Eventer
I can feeel your sensitivity
Joined on: Apr 17, 2012 20:05:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,737
|
Post by China Claus on Jan 26, 2014 21:15:02 GMT -5
Hopefully the release of this ring will bring the price down on the ESR.......
Either way, 2014 seems to be a good year for those of us that didn't have a chance to get a ring that's to scale before now.
And as some have already said, I do wish it was slightly smaller......
|
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Jan 26, 2014 21:19:37 GMT -5
Why do some of you guys want 18 by 18 or 20 by 20 instead? 22 by 22 takes up too much space?
I have the first RSR but didn't get any of the others or the Mattel ring - they are expensive and take up a lot of space. But if this one looks cool I might pick it up - if the price ain't crazy.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 10:51:13 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2014 21:31:51 GMT -5
i just died
|
|
|
|
Post by naparo01 on Jan 26, 2014 21:35:34 GMT -5
Upon further reflection and taking measurements of my RSR and ESR I urge everyone to take a look at the true measurements of these rings. Both the RSR and the ESR were advertise as being 22 x 22 inch rings but this is not completely true no matter how you look at it. At best these measurements are close but according to my tape measures ( and yes I used a couple different ones to make sure. And trust me i have measured these rings over and over again to make custom skirts and canvases for my own amusement. There are two ways to measure these rings. The first is from outside post to outside post. Now since these rings have posts that lie on the outside of the ring and are not carved into the corner (like real rings) this leads to a larger measurement from post to post that is different from the base side to side measurement. The ESR has a post to post measure of 23 inches and a base side to side measure of 22 and 1/2 inches. The RSR has a post to post measure of 21 3/8 inches and a base side to side measure of 20 1/2 inches.
So this means that the Jakks ring that claimed to be 22 inches was slightly smaller (and Ideal if you ask me) and the Mattel ring was larger than 22.
All I am saying is there is a chance that this new ring that is being touted as 22 inches may not be as over sized as we may fear.
|
|
oneil4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 11, 2004 22:14:30 GMT -5
Posts: 757
|
Post by oneil4life on Jan 26, 2014 22:13:44 GMT -5
I am happy this is happening, however 22x22 is to big... if the average WWE ring is 20' x 20' and every wrestler is pretty much 6' - 7'+, wouldnt that mean the ring should be no bigger then 20"x20" in order to be scale with the current line of figures (6" -7")?
|
|
|
|
Post by naparo01 on Jan 26, 2014 22:21:58 GMT -5
I am happy this is happening, however 22x22 is to big... if the average WWE ring is 20' x 20' and every wrestler is pretty much 6' - 7'+, wouldnt that mean the ring should be no bigger then 20"x20" in order to be scale with the current line of figures (6" -7")? REad my post right above yours. |
|
RVDIsTheBestEver
Main Eventer
WF 19 Year Member!
Joined on: Aug 17, 2005 21:19:58 GMT -5
Posts: 1,113
|
Post by RVDIsTheBestEver on Jan 26, 2014 22:31:18 GMT -5
I'm interested. I have the RSR HITC and the old school blue cage version. Never had the chance to get the ESR. I'm glad other rings are coming out. If any of my rings break i'm not trying to pay ebay prices to replace it. F that.
|
|
@Chair.Shot
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jan 31, 2012 4:38:24 GMT -5
Posts: 4,873
|
Post by @Chair.Shot on Jan 26, 2014 22:59:33 GMT -5
This is fantastic news!
|
|
|
|
Post by Vamp55 on Jan 26, 2014 23:05:20 GMT -5
Jeremy's back!!!!!!!! This is great news.
|
|
|
|
Post by Self-Savior on Jan 26, 2014 23:08:41 GMT -5
I'm glad that there's gonna be another ring coming out this year. Once the pictures hit, I'll probably make my decision whether or not to buy it. I just hope that the price isn't astronomical. If it's in the $50-$60 range, I'd be happy.
|
|
oneil4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 11, 2004 22:14:30 GMT -5
Posts: 757
|
Post by oneil4life on Jan 26, 2014 23:09:36 GMT -5
I am happy this is happening, however 22x22 is to big... if the average WWE ring is 20' x 20' and every wrestler is pretty much 6' - 7'+, wouldnt that mean the ring should be no bigger then 20"x20" in order to be scale with the current line of figures (6" -7")? REad my post right above yours. I read it, i still tink 22 x 22 is to big... Had the Mattel Elite Scale ring, and it was way way to big. Jakks ring is better, still a bit to big but not by much. Hope its outstanding and Jeremy has always worked hard for our community...hoping for the best. |
|
