|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 10:50:06 GMT -5
I dont see why Triple H is getting the full blame. Im sure Vince still has a lot to do with decision making. As much as I like CM Punk, he does have an attitude. He needs to realize that its not all about him. I do see where he is coming from, but come on. Because it's the easy/lazy thing to do. The people who still to this day defend Triple H are the same delusional people who have been saying for years, "Let's see where they go with this" despite the company continually getting worse each week and having zero long-term plans for anybody other than Cena. |
|
|
|
Post by Ben - #6 Munchie on Jan 29, 2014 10:51:27 GMT -5
If this is real, CM Punk still can't go to TNA or ROH because he is still signed with the WWE - no matter what for the time being. And also, if CM Punk walking out thinks it's gonna move Vince or Hunter into doing something better with Punk, then he's mistaken. Steve Austin walked out in 2002, and the WWE kept right on a rolling. The same will be done if CM Punk really does walk away and go home. But I can also see why CM Punk would go home. I am sure he's not entirely happy about Batista coming back just like that, to win the Rumble and then to go on to main event Wrestlemania XXX. Plus how the WWE is handling Daniel Bryan constantly, and other things, it's understandable if he's frustrated and wants to just walk away from it all. This. If he leaves he will be in the almost the exact same boat as Austin. I doubt he will ever go to TNA as he has stated you despised how they cut off the deal with ROH. I really hope this is just a work, but if it isn't, before anyone starts saying this is Triple H, Vince, or Punk's fault, you weren't there and don't know what happened so let's just see where this leads and wait until we get the facts straight. was just thinking this too. IF he did walk out,then you know they're gonna punish his girlfriend. I highly doubt that as the WWE knows she is the only Diva getting near the reaction of the Superstars and would be very unprofessional to take action against the guy's girlfriend. They screwed over Drew when they had a disagreement with his girlfriend. |
|
|
|
Post by philly boi on Jan 29, 2014 10:55:19 GMT -5
This. If he leaves he will be in the almost the exact same boat as Austin. I doubt he will ever go to TNA as he has stated you despised how they cut off the deal with ROH. I really hope this is just a work, but if it isn't, before anyone starts saying this is Triple H, Vince, or Punk's fault, you weren't there and don't know what happened so let's just see where this leads and wait until we get the facts straight. I highly doubt that as the WWE knows she is the only Diva getting near the reaction of the Superstars and would be very unprofessional to take action against the guy's girlfriend. They screwed over Drew when they had a disagreement with his girlfriend. AJ is more of an asset to the company than Drew ever was. Sorry. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 29, 2014 10:56:29 GMT -5
Because it's the easy/lazy thing to do. The people who still to this day defend Triple H are the same delusional people who have been saying for years, "Let's see where they go with this" despite the company continually getting worse each week and having zero long-term plans for anybody other than Cena. You're one of the lazy ones. You don't watch the show, yet you're one of the first to tell those that do how awful the show is. Reading something online is a lot different than actually watching it. And by not watching it, your views become obsolete. |
|
|
|
Post by Ben - #6 Munchie on Jan 29, 2014 10:56:30 GMT -5
They screwed over Drew when they had a disagreement with his girlfriend. AJ is more of an asset to the company than Drew ever was. Sorry. We all know that, but do the WWE see that? We all know how they treat the Divas as is. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:51:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 10:58:11 GMT -5
Hey, if he decides down the road he wants to become a part timer, he'll be able to main event Wrestlemania.
|
|
|
|
Post by demetreymo90 on Jan 29, 2014 11:00:32 GMT -5
I hope this is all just a work....but If this is true, then...
DAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMNNN IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jan 29, 2014 11:04:53 GMT -5
Sooo am I the only one who wants to see him do a run in New Japan?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zigzag on Jan 29, 2014 11:06:32 GMT -5
I love the guy and his matches, but honestly, as far as I'm concerned... He can stay, go, or grow mushrooms in his butt-crack. That said, I hope this is some sort of work to draw interest in Punk and WM 30. Why? As I understood it, rumors were that Bryan was penciled in to win the title at the Chamber match at EC, leading to a Bryan-Batista-Orton triple threat main event at WM 30. Now, if this is legit, and Punk walked off, Bryan takes over against HHH. Presumably no longer in the title picture. If Punk's walk-off was legit, you would think he wouldn't want to jeopardize a potential main event plan for his buddy. Or maybe he is just that selfish?
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 29, 2014 11:10:13 GMT -5
Oh. My god.
I joked about him not being there because "he took his ball and went home"
And he really did.
another check for the Nostradamus of WFigs.
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 29, 2014 11:12:56 GMT -5
This is a protest because of the Bryan thing? Wish he coulda got more people to leave with him.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 11:19:15 GMT -5
The people who still to this day defend Triple H are the same delusional people who have been saying for years, "Let's see where they go with this" despite the company continually getting worse each week and having zero long-term plans for anybody other than Cena. You're one of the lazy ones. You don't watch the show, yet you're one of the first to tell those that do how awful the show is. Reading something online is a lot different than actually watching it. And by not watching it, your views become obsolete. So, if I don't watch the show because it sucks that means I'm lazy, but if I do watch it that means I'm a hypocrite? You must write for the WWE with that logic. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:51:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 11:22:02 GMT -5
Imagine if punk and Bryan left for tna along with some more people. They could put up ratings If Hogan, Nash, Flair, Sting, Booker T etc couldn't boost TNA's ratings why would Bryan and Punk boost them? |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 11:23:32 GMT -5
I love the guy and his matches, but honestly, as far as I'm concerned... He can stay, go, or grow mushrooms in his butt-crack. That said, I hope this is some sort of work to draw interest in Punk and WM 30. Why? As I understood it, rumors were that Bryan was penciled in to win the title at the Chamber match at EC, leading to a Bryan-Batista-Orton triple threat main event at WM 30. Now, if this is legit, and Punk walked off, Bryan takes over against HHH. Presumably no longer in the title picture. If Punk's walk-off was legit, you would think he wouldn't want to jeopardize a potential main event plan for his buddy. Or maybe he is just that selfish? Where in the world did you hear that Bryan would be winning the title at EC? There has never been any possibility discussed whatsoever that Bryan would be in the main event at Wrestlemania. The plan has been Orton vs. Batista, and reports have said that Bryan's reaction at the Rumble did nothing to change that. |
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Jan 29, 2014 11:24:40 GMT -5
I dont see why Triple H is getting the full blame. Im sure Vince still has a lot to do with decision making. As much as I like CM Punk, he does have an attitude. He needs to realize that its not all about him. I do see where he is coming from, but come on. Because it's the easy/lazy thing to do. That along with the fact that everyone likes to make very rash opinions over assumptions they have made without actually being apart of the situation. |
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 29, 2014 11:24:43 GMT -5
Don't know who is to blame, don't care who is to blame. I just know that it flat out sucks. Punk is solely responsible for my resurgence of interest a few years ago. A lot of what he was doing made me feel like an excited kid again. I still enjoy nearly everything that he does.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:51:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 11:27:42 GMT -5
I dont see why Triple H is getting the full blame. Im sure Vince still has a lot to do with decision making. As much as I like CM Punk, he does have an attitude. He needs to realize that its not all about him. I do see where he is coming from, but come on. Because it's the easy/lazy thing to do. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Jan 29, 2014 11:28:28 GMT -5
Punk is being unprofessional and would be wise to consult Austin about the matter, as the Rattlesnake did something very similar and now seems to really regret it.
Whilst I don't agree with his actions I may sympathise with his concerns. If he's saying "I should face HHH and Bryan should be in the title match" then fair enough. If he's saying he should be above Bryan then I don't sympathise, as Bryan is clearly the more popular of the two and also the one more needing of the title. Saying that, I expect the first option is more likely to be his concern so I do sympathise.
I can also see why Batista is the final straw. Punk clearly disliked Rock coming back at first but by both his and Rock's accounts warmed up to him (most likely a combination of getting to know Rock and seeing his huge paycheck for the events with him). Batista is a different case however because he doesn't have Rock's or even Brock's name value yet is getting similar treatment. I can definitely understand Punk being pissed at that but disagree with him walking out.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:51:09 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 11:29:30 GMT -5
Wow, I guess his contract expires in July. This really bums me out and it sucks that Punk and Bryan both are tangled in each of their respective messes right now.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 29, 2014 11:29:35 GMT -5
You're one of the lazy ones. You don't watch the show, yet you're one of the first to tell those that do how awful the show is. Reading something online is a lot different than actually watching it. And by not watching it, your views become obsolete. So, if I don't watch the show because it sucks that means I'm lazy, but if I do watch it that means I'm a hypocrite? You must write for the WWE with that logic. If I don't watch the Superbowl how could I judge if it was a good game or not? Just cause I read someone else didn't like it doesn't mean I wouldn't have. You reading someone else saying WWE sucks isn't the same as making your own educated opinion. So yes, you piggybacking your opinion off something you read does make you sound lazy. I've been watching WWE weekly & for the most part I enjoy it. I don't agree with everything they do, but at least I made that opinion up for myself. And that's more than you can say. |
|
