Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 2:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 11:33:10 GMT -5
Good. Sick of hearing about his whiny-ass. Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 11:36:13 GMT -5
So, if I don't watch the show because it sucks that means I'm lazy, but if I do watch it that means I'm a hypocrite? You must write for the WWE with that logic. If I don't watch the Superbowl how could I judge if it was a good game or not? Just cause I read someone else didn't like it doesn't mean I wouldn't have. You reading someone else saying WWE sucks isn't the same as making your own educated opinion. So yes, you piggybacking your opinion off something you read does make you sound lazy. I've been watching WWE weekly & for the most part I enjoy it. I don't agree with everything they do, but at least I made that opinion up for myself. And that's more than you can say. I'm reading the results straight off WWE.com, so my opinions definitely aren't being reflected by reading someone else's opinions on the show. If I don't like something, why should I watch it? If you have a favorite sports team and you don't watch games because they're atrocious and instead rely on box scores and highlights to keep up, does that mean you're not a fan, too? |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jan 29, 2014 11:37:31 GMT -5
Sooo am I the only one who wants to see him do a run in New Japan? First thing I thought off aha. Punk vs Okada by the end of the year please. |
|
The Hitman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 24, 2006 17:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by The Hitman on Jan 29, 2014 11:41:56 GMT -5
I won't say I will not miss him, but WWE is bigger than one superstar. If Austin left and the company continued fine, then Punk will not have an impact. Daniel Bryan the last 6 months has easily moved into the number 2 spot behind Cena, so it's not like these young stars are coming up. Honestly it gets tiring hearing about how Punk acts like douche, so maybe we need a break from Punk. Let him recharge his batteries and mindset and come back in a few months with a fresh take on WWE. It's not like he is going to TNA, so WWE is not worried.
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Jan 29, 2014 11:41:57 GMT -5
Sooo am I the only one who wants to see him do a run in New Japan? First thing I thought off aha. Punk vs Okada by the end of the year please. This sounds awkward to me. |
|
nDroo73
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 3, 2013 15:33:09 GMT -5
Posts: 698 
|
Post by nDroo73 on Jan 29, 2014 11:42:40 GMT -5
I would've hoped if he is really walking that he'd grab a mic, live on Raw, and just shoot. F bombs and all. Get Batista going to the point he's dropping f bombs and then the WWE loses the PG rating. That way if he leaves, at least he left his mark and we don't have to deal with this cautious PG stuff and get back to when the crowd was going nuts. Middle fingers, puppies, "bad words" and blood!!
|
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Jan 29, 2014 11:43:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 11:43:52 GMT -5
I would've hoped if he is really walking that he'd grab a mic, live on Raw, and just shoot. F bombs and all. Get Batista going to the point he's dropping f bombs and then the WWE loses the PG rating. That way if he leaves, at least he left his mark and we don't have to deal with this cautious PG stuff and get back to when the crowd was going nuts. Middle fingers, puppies, "bad words" and blood!! You do realize the second he were to go off script they would just cut his mic off, right? |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 29, 2014 11:44:39 GMT -5
If I don't watch the Superbowl how could I judge if it was a good game or not? Just cause I read someone else didn't like it doesn't mean I wouldn't have. You reading someone else saying WWE sucks isn't the same as making your own educated opinion. So yes, you piggybacking your opinion off something you read does make you sound lazy. I've been watching WWE weekly & for the most part I enjoy it. I don't agree with everything they do, but at least I made that opinion up for myself. And that's more than you can say. I'm reading the results straight off WWE.com, so my opinions definitely aren't being reflected by reading someone else's opinions on the show. If I don't like something, why should I watch it? If you have a favorite sports team and you don't watch games because they're atrocious and instead rely on box scores and highlights to keep up, does that mean you're not a fan, too? Reading the results are completely different than watching it. WWE.com or anywhere else. It's not the same as seeing it yourself. Reading "The Shield defeated the Rhodes Brothers" doesn't display how the action was. Doesn't sound all that impressive at all to read it. Meanwhile the match was a 30 minute classic on free TV and you have no clue if it was entertaining or not. |
|
|
|
Post by Zigzag on Jan 29, 2014 11:46:29 GMT -5
I love the guy and his matches, but honestly, as far as I'm concerned... He can stay, go, or grow mushrooms in his butt-crack. That said, I hope this is some sort of work to draw interest in Punk and WM 30. Why? As I understood it, rumors were that Bryan was penciled in to win the title at the Chamber match at EC, leading to a Bryan-Batista-Orton triple threat main event at WM 30. Now, if this is legit, and Punk walked off, Bryan takes over against HHH. Presumably no longer in the title picture. If Punk's walk-off was legit, you would think he wouldn't want to jeopardize a potential main event plan for his buddy. Or maybe he is just that selfish? Where in the world did you hear that Bryan would be winning the title at EC? There has never been any possibility discussed whatsoever that Bryan would be in the main event at Wrestlemania. The plan has been Orton vs. Batista, and reports have said that Bryan's reaction at the Rumble did nothing to change that. Source: Pwinsider.com There’s talk in WWE right now of having Daniel Bryan win the WWE World Heavyweight Championship at the Elimination Chamber pay-per-view. This is NOT confirmed and has only been talked about as of this writing. The idea is that having him win the title at that show will pop the RAW rating the following night, as that is the night that the WWE Network will launch, so they want as many eyeballs on that show as possible. There has already been talk of having a lot of big names from the past on RAW the night after the Elimination Chamber for the same reason. If they decide to pull the trigger on that plan, then the WrestleMania XXX main event will likely become a triple-threat match featuring Bryan, Batista and Randy Orton. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on Jan 29, 2014 11:47:14 GMT -5
First thing I thought off aha. Punk vs Okada by the end of the year please. This sounds awkward to me. Not as awkward as the Gracie match at Wrestle Kingdom. |
|
nDroo73
Superstar
Joined on: Jun 3, 2013 15:33:09 GMT -5
Posts: 698
|
Post by nDroo73 on Jan 29, 2014 11:49:27 GMT -5
I would've hoped if he is really walking that he'd grab a mic, live on Raw, and just shoot. F bombs and all. Get Batista going to the point he's dropping f bombs and then the WWE loses the PG rating. That way if he leaves, at least he left his mark and we don't have to deal with this cautious PG stuff and get back to when the crowd was going nuts. Middle fingers, puppies, "bad words" and blood!! You do realize the second he were to go off script they would just cut his mic off, right? Yep, sure do. |
|
CaK
Main Eventer
Possible Bad Trader Not allowed to trade here
Follow at @245TStudios!!!!
Joined on: May 6, 2006 8:52:03 GMT -5
Posts: 1,518
|
Post by CaK on Jan 29, 2014 11:56:14 GMT -5
I could see where he could be upset with the Part Timers....I mean if I had a full time job that I busted my ass for and then all these part timers or temps came in and got the raises then I too would be pissed. I hope this isnt true as I have been a fan since before WWE and have always loved Punk as I grew up with him, IWA MS was a mile down the road. If true this sucks but I am sure he will be back at some point. If work then bravo
|
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jan 29, 2014 12:03:17 GMT -5
Really hope this isn't true  |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 2:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 12:07:38 GMT -5
Who cares? Punk is such a whiny little bitch. Good riddance. Do you know the full story? Because if you do I would like to hear it. For this particular incident, no one knows the full story. For multiple incidents in the past, including the MitB 2011 fiasco, the story goes like this: Punk doesn't get his way, Punk throws a childish temper tantrum. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 2:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 12:10:33 GMT -5
The people who still to this day defend Triple H are the same delusional people who have been saying for years, "Let's see where they go with this" despite the company continually getting worse each week and having zero long-term plans for anybody other than Cena. You're one of the lazy ones. You don't watch the show, yet you're one of the first to tell those that do how awful the show is. Reading something online is a lot different than actually watching it. And by not watching it, your views become obsolete.  |
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Jan 29, 2014 12:14:44 GMT -5
I'm reading the results straight off WWE.com, so my opinions definitely aren't being reflected by reading someone else's opinions on the show. If I don't like something, why should I watch it? If you have a favorite sports team and you don't watch games because they're atrocious and instead rely on box scores and highlights to keep up, does that mean you're not a fan, too? Reading the results are completely different than watching it. WWE.com or anywhere else. It's not the same as seeing it yourself. Reading "The Shield defeated the Rhodes Brothers" doesn't display how the action was. Doesn't sound all that impressive at all to read it. Meanwhile the match was a 30 minute classic on free TV and you have no clue if it was entertaining or not. You're not understanding that my problem isn't with the matches, but the storylines themselves. I don't care about missing the occasional good match now and then if to watch it I would have to sit through 2 1/2 hours of filler and garbage storylines. I can get a summary of the storylines and get a good idea if it's something I would actually want to tune in for. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 16, 2024 2:36:54 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2014 12:19:08 GMT -5
The people who are going "good, I'm glad he's gone" are probably the same people who wish he gets Corn Flakes inside a Count Chocula box. C'mon guys, that's just not right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Justin on Jan 29, 2014 12:19:42 GMT -5
This sounds awkward to me. Not as awkward as the Gracie match at Wrestle Kingdom. That Gracie match sucked balls |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jan 29, 2014 12:36:32 GMT -5
Reading the results are completely different than watching it. WWE.com or anywhere else. It's not the same as seeing it yourself. Reading "The Shield defeated the Rhodes Brothers" doesn't display how the action was. Doesn't sound all that impressive at all to read it. Meanwhile the match was a 30 minute classic on free TV and you have no clue if it was entertaining or not. You're not understanding that my problem isn't with the matches, but the storylines themselves. I don't care about missing the occasional good match now and then if to watch it I would have to sit through 2 1/2 hours of filler and garbage storylines. I can get a summary of the storylines and get a good idea if it's something I would actually want to tune in for. No I understand. And I mean no offense but IMO one can't call it filler or garbage if they don't watch it. You don't watch = you have no educated opinion. |
|
