Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Mar 3, 2014 0:06:31 GMT -5
Interesting, because Triple H wanted to lose to CM Punk at Wrestlemania, but that wasn't good enough for CM Punk. Where did you read that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Just curious. I've read Punk was mad that he got bumped from the match for Daniel Bryan. And then he would have fought Kane or somebody? I don't know. We had heard Punk/HHH and Bryan/Sheamus - which nobody wanted - and then plans were changed to put Bryan against Hunter. And the rumored Lesnar/Taker, Cena/Wyatt, and Batista/Orton matches have all become fact. I just haven't heard anything about Hunter taking the loss - and it just doesn't fit his M.O. Punk wasn't going to go over HHH because he wasn't going to resign with the company. Wouldn't make sense to have Punk go over on the biggest stage and leave in three months.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Mar 3, 2014 0:09:36 GMT -5
Yeah that'll work cause Punk and Dolph are totally on the same level. I think Dolph IS on the same level as Punk. The WWE totally ruined him by turning him face and making him look weak - all so they could try to get the boring Del Rio over for the 20th time? He's great as a cocky heel and to think he's fallen so far in the past year is terrible - just another guy pushed aside so "The Authority" can be the focal point of the "WWE Universe." Uh...Punk is #3 babyface...Ziggler is like #10 so yeah not on the same level. They don't care about Ziggler so if he walks out, nobody gives a damn. I don't think we'd be seeing fans trying to hijack RAW in his name. Not even close.
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Mar 3, 2014 0:10:00 GMT -5
Interesting, because Triple H wanted to lose to CM Punk at Wrestlemania, but that wasn't good enough for CM Punk. Where did you read that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Just curious. I've read Punk was mad that he got bumped from the match for Daniel Bryan. And then he would have fought Kane or somebody? I don't know. We had heard Punk/HHH and Bryan/Sheamus - which nobody wanted - and then plans were changed to put Bryan against Hunter. And the rumored Lesnar/Taker, Cena/Wyatt, and Batista/Orton matches have all become fact. I just haven't heard anything about Hunter taking the loss - and it just doesn't fit his M.O. You're right. Triple H never does anything for anybody. He only lost 2 years in a row to Undertaker, lost the Lesnar feud, and did an angle where he was physically unable to continue a match against Curtis Axel.....yup, Triple H has to have it be all about him all the time. The plan all along was Triple H losing to CM Punk. Daniel Bryan was going to go heel, but when CM Punk started getting his panties in a wad they hit the abort on the Daniel Bryan joining the Wyatt Family because somebody needed to be the one fighting the Authority. You seriously NEVER wondered why Daniel Bryan joined the Wyatt's for a week and then it awkwardly ended and then he went right back into the "getting screwed by Triple H" story? Come on, man, get with the program.
|
|
Chief
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 21, 2008 15:36:44 GMT -5
Posts: 2,849
|
Post by Chief on Mar 3, 2014 0:16:07 GMT -5
Where did you read that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Just curious. I've read Punk was mad that he got bumped from the match for Daniel Bryan. And then he would have fought Kane or somebody? I don't know. We had heard Punk/HHH and Bryan/Sheamus - which nobody wanted - and then plans were changed to put Bryan against Hunter. And the rumored Lesnar/Taker, Cena/Wyatt, and Batista/Orton matches have all become fact. I just haven't heard anything about Hunter taking the loss - and it just doesn't fit his M.O. You're right. Triple H never does anything for anybody. He only lost 2 years in a row to Undertaker, lost the Lesnar feud, and did an angle where he was physically unable to continue a match against Curtis Axel.....yup, Triple H has to have it be all about him all the time. The plan all along was Triple H losing to CM Punk. Daniel Bryan was going to go heel, but when CM Punk started getting his panties in a wad they hit the abort on the Daniel Bryan joining the Wyatt Family because somebody needed to be the one fighting the Authority. You seriously NEVER wondered why Daniel Bryan joined the Wyatt's for a week and then it awkwardly ended and then he went right back into the "getting screwed by Triple H" story? Come on, man, get with the program. HHH was never going to lose to Punk. He was going to leave in July. What sense would that make?
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Mar 3, 2014 0:19:06 GMT -5
The plan all along was Triple H losing to CM Punk. Daniel Bryan was going to go heel, but when CM Punk started getting his panties in a wad they hit the abort on the Daniel Bryan joining the Wyatt Family because somebody needed to be the one fighting the Authority. You seriously NEVER wondered why Daniel Bryan joined the Wyatt's for a week and then it awkwardly ended and then he went right back into the "getting screwed by Triple H" story? Come on, man, get with the program. What? I've never heard this anywhere. They tried to make Daniel Bryan a heel because they are idiots and it was soundly rejected by the fans. It was a terrible storyline that nobody wanted and bombed. Where have you heard they changed that dreadful storyline because Punk was pouting? So was Daniel Bryan gonna be a heel at Mania? The only matches I've heard rumored for him were against Sheamus and against Triple H. They had planned Cena vs Wyatt for a while, I don't know where Daniel Bryan fit into that at all. I think you're just making stuff up now.
|
|
inkboy83
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 1, 2012 20:57:49 GMT -5
Posts: 1,088
|
Post by inkboy83 on Mar 3, 2014 0:37:12 GMT -5
I have a gut feeling that he won't show.
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Mar 3, 2014 1:01:37 GMT -5
Where did you read that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Just curious. I've read Punk was mad that he got bumped from the match for Daniel Bryan. And then he would have fought Kane or somebody? I don't know. We had heard Punk/HHH and Bryan/Sheamus - which nobody wanted - and then plans were changed to put Bryan against Hunter. And the rumored Lesnar/Taker, Cena/Wyatt, and Batista/Orton matches have all become fact. I just haven't heard anything about Hunter taking the loss - and it just doesn't fit his M.O. You're right. Triple H never does anything for anybody. He only lost 2 years in a row to Undertaker, lost the Lesnar feud, and did an angle where he was physically unable to continue a match against Curtis Axel.....yup, Triple H has to have it be all about him all the time. LOL at losing to Undertaker and his streak at WM as anything remotely resembling giving back to the business or whatever you're trying to spin that into. It was all about him getting huge matches at 'Mania when in reality, there were other guys that really could have used the rub a lot more than H. He wasn't even a full-time performer during those times. Also worth noting that H beat Lesnar in the middle of the ring at 'Mania last year in what must be the most forgettable match of that entire show. And seriously, who was buying a ticket to watch him win, and why wouldn't he, in his selfless, infinite wisdom, beat the most expensive wrestler on the roster instead of doing the job for him at the biggest show of the year? And did you watch the match against Axel? It was five awkward minutes of H totally dominating Axel. The only selling he was doing was selling an injury he already had going into the match. Axel looked much worse after that match than he did going into it. Bottom line is, H is still the same selfish, slow, bloated, photoshopped, orange H that thinks he's one of the biggest stars of all-time because he booked himself to be on top and to win a dozen world titles in feuds that often embarrassed, buried, and ruined the drawing power of his opponents. I have no doubt that he would have beaten Punk at Wrestlemania, and I am nervous that he's going to beat Bryan now instead, after spending the next 5 weeks burying him as a flash in the pan, internet famous indie wrestling darling who doesn't have what it takes to hang in the ring with Orton, Batista, Sheamus, Undertaker, and H himself.
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Mar 3, 2014 1:12:53 GMT -5
If this is true, its awful. CM Punk is most overrated person in the history of wrestling. He was never the best in the world. He was never even the best in the building. Now I have to listen to this jackass talk again. He whines and bitches because he wasn't in a high enough profile match at Wrestlemania only to return and be put in the main event, and likely to win. This is probably the most egregious example of backstage politics that I have ever heard. What a selfish prick. I never respected him as a performer, but I also have zero respect for him as a man, not that it matters anyway.
Edit: Actually, if this is true this is basically Wrestlemania 9 all over again, so maybe it's not the MOST egregious example...but it's definitely up there.
|
|
|
Post by RKOrton #ThankYouLesnar on Mar 3, 2014 1:46:36 GMT -5
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Mar 3, 2014 2:00:36 GMT -5
Where did you read that? I haven't seen that reported anywhere. Just curious. I've read Punk was mad that he got bumped from the match for Daniel Bryan. And then he would have fought Kane or somebody? I don't know. We had heard Punk/HHH and Bryan/Sheamus - which nobody wanted - and then plans were changed to put Bryan against Hunter. And the rumored Lesnar/Taker, Cena/Wyatt, and Batista/Orton matches have all become fact. I just haven't heard anything about Hunter taking the loss - and it just doesn't fit his M.O. You're right. Triple H never does anything for anybody. He only lost 2 years in a row to Undertaker, lost the Lesnar feud, and did an angle where he was physically unable to continue a match against Curtis Axel.....yup, Triple H has to have it be all about him all the time. The plan all along was Triple H losing to CM Punk. Daniel Bryan was going to go heel, but when CM Punk started getting his panties in a wad they hit the abort on the Daniel Bryan joining the Wyatt Family because somebody needed to be the one fighting the Authority. You seriously NEVER wondered why Daniel Bryan joined the Wyatt's for a week and then it awkwardly ended and then he went right back into the "getting screwed by Triple H" story? Come on, man, get with the program. The Wyatt storyline was cut short because Bryan was starting to gain mainstream attention and WWE wasn't going to have him in a backwoods costume during it. You two both need to shut up as neither of you know what you are talking about and it is really annoying.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:40:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 2:19:33 GMT -5
Daniel Bryan getting taken out of the Wyatt angle was directly related to his yes chants being all over Sports Center with the college basketball crowds chanting yes!...........no one really know Punks problem......there is speculation that he was trying to get Luke gallows and another friend of his hired and they told him they would and but never did.......he was tired of being lied to and split.......
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:40:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 4:09:40 GMT -5
If he comes back then great, he will definately make WrestleMania better regardless of who he faces.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:40:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 6:22:56 GMT -5
You're right. Triple H never does anything for anybody. He only lost 2 years in a row to Undertaker, lost the Lesnar feud, and did an angle where he was physically unable to continue a match against Curtis Axel.....yup, Triple H has to have it be all about him all the time. LOL at losing to Undertaker and his streak at WM as anything remotely resembling giving back to the business or whatever you're trying to spin that into. It was all about him getting huge matches at 'Mania when in reality, there were other guys that really could have used the rub a lot more than H. He wasn't even a full-time performer during those times. Also worth noting that H beat Lesnar in the middle of the ring at 'Mania last year in what must be the most forgettable match of that entire show. And seriously, who was buying a ticket to watch him win, and why wouldn't he, in his selfless, infinite wisdom, beat the most expensive wrestler on the roster instead of doing the job for him at the biggest show of the year? And did you watch the match against Axel? It was five awkward minutes of H totally dominating Axel. The only selling he was doing was selling an injury he already had going into the match. Axel looked much worse after that match than he did going into it. Bottom line is, H is still the same selfish, slow, bloated, photoshopped, orange H that thinks he's one of the biggest stars of all-time because he booked himself to be on top and to win a dozen world titles in feuds that often embarrassed, buried, and ruined the drawing power of his opponents. I have no doubt that he would have beaten Punk at Wrestlemania, and I am nervous that he's going to beat Bryan now instead, after spending the next 5 weeks burying him as a flash in the pan, internet famous indie wrestling darling who doesn't have what it takes to hang in the ring with Orton, Batista, Sheamus, Undertaker, and H himself. This post pure brilliance. Bravo, sir.
|
|
|
Post by The Mask of Truth on Mar 3, 2014 6:51:05 GMT -5
If he comes back, cool. If he doesn't come back, cool.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 3, 2014 6:53:50 GMT -5
I hope it is true because I want Bryan to win the belt at WM 30..
Punk should beat HHH.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 23:40:05 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 3, 2014 7:23:46 GMT -5
it'll be interesting...I can't imagine he comes back without a guaranteed headlining match at mania I want Bryan in the title match too & I'm not a fan of Punk, but HHH/Bryan has to happen now - he challenged him... I would hope that happens & there's the stip that if bryan wins, he gets a 2nd match that night, for the title...triple threat match or just winner of batista/orton I'd love to see Batista vs Bryan with them both already wrestling earlier - that is how you book a 30th anniversary wrestling card, but they're not that creative I agree with you about the headlining match, there's no way he comes back for some throw away match. Also he shouldn't be "rewarded" for walking out, but we'll see when the real story comes out about what happened. The stipulation for Bryan/HHH has to happen. I know people like to crap on WWE creative, HHH's shovel, and all that other typical nonsense but there's no way anyone in that company actually believes fans want to see Orton vs Batista.
The card is far from finalized, it's still a month away so there's a lot that can play out but as of right now it's not looking great. Hopefully after tomorrow my opinion will change. just like nobody wanted to see Big Show vs Randy Orton but we got it. Just like nobody wanted to see John Cena vs Randy Orton times one million but we got that. Just like nobody gives a flying about Alberto Del Rio but he is continued to be shoved down our throats. Face it if HHH or Vince are behind something it's going to happen no matter if the fans are behind it or not.
|
|
|
Post by Joey Cush on Mar 3, 2014 8:01:30 GMT -5
Unless they rush Steve Austin back to do a program with Punk, there is nowhere for Punk to go on the card. He said he wants to Main Event Mania. Bryan/HHH was already planted on RAW and what are they going to do, reward Punk for walking out on them by putting him in the title match with Orton/Batista, in the most random ass triple threat in recent memory?
If he does indeed come back, its only going to be thrown into the mix for one of the worst built Mania cards ever.
|
|
|
Post by iamkrang on Mar 3, 2014 8:39:11 GMT -5
Speculation aside, I hope he is back tonight. He is an under contract star. Nowhere did WWE mention he walked out of the company. When Stone Cold walked out it was a vocal point of RAW.
If CM Punk did walk out to play hard all for Wrestlemania good for him. That's how the business world works. You either get passed by or throw your weight around and see where the chips fall. The world of WWE isn't about being a "team player". You are under contract as a performer. Why would you settle and accept things if you knew you had the balls and clout not to.
Batista didn't settle when he just returned? And I hate the fact people crapon Batista whose back for 2-3 years. I get he's not an internet favorite and he's not looked that formidable since returning. But why would you go to a job and settle for the backseat when they are offering you the spotlight and the keys to the car.
|
|
|
Post by LostHawk05 on Mar 3, 2014 9:00:46 GMT -5
If he comes back have him attack Bryan. Punk vs Bryan at Mania would be epic.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Charisma on Mar 3, 2014 9:16:36 GMT -5
Maybe Punk will return to save Bryan from a beating by Trips and Kane
Tag team match for Mania? I think Kane is definitely Mania worthy
|
|