Are you actually going to enjoy Brock as champion?

I mentioned this in a previous thread, but I'm not sure why everyone assumes Lesnar will have a lengthy reign, or any kind of reign for that matter, when he beats Cena. I can't imagine WWE will have Lesnar win at SummerSlam and hold the belt til Mania after the incessant complaining that went on when Rock went from Rumble to Mania. I also can't imagine Lesnar losing to anyone for any reason prior to Mania.

In my estimation, the only thing that would make sense is for Lesnar to absolutely kick Cena's ass, win the title and vacate it the next night on Raw. If Lesnar decimates Cena and wins the title, then what more does he have to prove? He has said that he wants to be WWE World Heavyweight Champion. He has never said that he wants to defend the title or have a long reign.

I think on the post-SummerSlam Raw Lesnar and Heyman claim that he has done it all and has nothing left to prove. He surrenders the titles to The Authority and a tournament is set up for Night of Champions. That also allows them to eliminate the Big Gold Belt and introduce the new WWE Championship in a logical and fluid manner.

Then an enemy of The Authority like Batista wins the title before Triple H convinces Lesnar to come back at Rumble of Elimination Chamber to win the title back. Then it culminates in Lesnar dropping the title to Bryan or Reigns at Mania.

That's how you get Lesnar from SummerSlam to Mania as champion without having him lose and without having him technically hold the strap for the entire time.

No they won't.  You will still be a fan, and you will still be a subscriber.  I have seen many people over the years say "if Cena wins, I am no longer watching" but they still watch each week anyhow.

And it doesn't matter now if Lesnar loses every match he ever has now.  All that mattered was he ended the streak.  It was like the Honky Tonk Man back in the day.  He pretty much lost every match ever after losing the IC Title, but it didn't matter, cause he was still the longest reigning IC Champion in the history of the WWE.

Lesnar could lay down every match now, and it wouldn't matter, cause the next day Paul Heyman could say "Lesnar ended the streak" and that is a big deal because Lesnar is the only one who can say he did that.  So it doesn't matter if he loses to Cena at SummerSlam.

I actually really like this idea. The only slight problem I have with is it, is I hate the idea of the WWE Title being vacated 3 times within a year, especially if they don't have to. Other than that, I absolutely love the plan.

I see what you mean with angry wrestling fans threatening not to watch another episode after an upsetting event. It's true, in my case though, I stopped watching wwe like I used to religiously. I was one of the fans that got tired of the Cena and Orton fueds, Cena as champion again, crappy stories etc. I can't believe I stopped watching my favorite entertainment because of the those reasons but I really did lose interest since 2006 - 2007. I don't even have interest in paying 9.99 a month. But I believe wwe gains more fans than lose them . Its not like they'll come knocking at my door begging for me to be a fan again. So yeah, there's people that do get fed up.
As for SS, if Cena wins, how many would actually be surprised that super Cena once again overcame the challenge? Because by the comments most are convinced that Brock will walk out as champion. Could upset many if Cena won , but hey! Brock defeated the streak!! -_- anyways to answer the op, I'll take any champion but Cena...... And Orton.