|
Post by punksnotdead on Dec 4, 2014 12:51:54 GMT -5
Oh man, I would have LOVED to see Punk as the face of Slim Jim. That's just really disappointing to hear about the office under cutting Punk on all of that stuff. It's really just an extension of not knowing what people want though and being so out of touch with society. They had this guy that made wrestling feel cool again for 10 minutes and they seemingly did everything within their power to keep wrestling status quo, so the declining laughing stock of a product it is right now. They just don't get it, or maybe they totally get it and are just doing everything they can to manipulate it. It's just sad, and not organic or authentic.
I'm genuinely excited for what Punk has going on though. Really hope he gets the part of Dwight in the Walking Dead, or gets to be in a GI Joe movie, or anything along those lines. Seems like he's got plenty lined up that he's just not mentioning at this point.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 4, 2014 13:06:59 GMT -5
Part 2 was excellent too, and it further paints the angle that WWE never wanted Punk to be a star. Of course, it's still just one side of the story, but a lot of these things sound very WWE-esque.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 4, 2014 13:31:31 GMT -5
Ryback responds....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:40:24 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2014 13:34:58 GMT -5
Part 2 was excellent too, and it further paints the angle that WWE never wanted Punk to be a star. Of course, it's still just one side of the story, but a lot of these things sound very WWE-esque. And to be fair, on the Punk DVD, made by WWE, you have a handful of guys straight saying no one wanted Punk as a star. And people want to jump and say stuff like there are tons of guys that deal with the same thing as Punk did but they don't complain or walk out. Because they are afraid. And they will continue to take what is given them and later in life when the pain is too much, they will probably turn to pills and join a long list of guys who died early because abuse. Any one that wants to say Punk bitches too much and is a quiter, I will keep you in mind if I ever start a business. Because it's good to know I could sh** down your throat and you'd just sit there and take it.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 4, 2014 13:52:36 GMT -5
Part 2 was excellent too, and it further paints the angle that WWE never wanted Punk to be a star. Of course, it's still just one side of the story, but a lot of these things sound very WWE-esque. And to be fair, on the Punk DVD, made by WWE, you have a handful of guys straight saying no one wanted Punk as a star. And people want to jump and say stuff like there are tons of guys that deal with the same thing as Punk did but they don't complain or walk out. Because they are afraid. And they will continue to take what is given them and later in life when the pain is too much, they will probably turn to pills and join a long list of guys who died early because abuse. Any one that wants to say Punk bitches too much and is a quiter, I will keep you in mind if I ever start a business. Because it's good to know I could sh** down your throat and you'd just sit there and take it. I think the other thing to keep in mind with Punk is that no one really reached the level of stardom he had either. With the way crowds were reacting, and with the mainstream attention he was being given, if the WWE machine had gotten behind him, he only would've grown. WWE has long needed a guy that can be the face of the company to their 18-49 demographic. Cena can't be that. Adult males don't like him, that's been proven. CM Punk could have been to the adult audience what John Cena is to the young audience, and they stifled it. I'll never forgot the house show I attended in 2012 a couple of months before Punk turned heel. Maine has always been what I'd consider a John Cena state. We're filled with mostly casual fans and shows with Cena always do well here. They brought a Supershow during the summer of '12, and both Cena and Punk were on the card. Cena worked the match right before intermission, and Punk headlined with Bryan. Punk's reaction was double that of Cena's, and both merch booths sold out of every single piece of Punk merchandise they had on hand that night. The t-shirt ratio, looking around at the crowd, was 2-to-1 in favor of Punk, easily. That was eye opening to me.
|
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Dec 4, 2014 14:04:42 GMT -5
Just like Punk said its the only show in town. No one wants to loose their job. He made himself relevant in the mainstream (like Bryan) and WWE did everything they could to keep his head below water.
|
|
|
Post by Glorydaysofwrestling on Dec 4, 2014 14:08:52 GMT -5
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Dec 4, 2014 14:09:59 GMT -5
I know it's been a thing since the beginning of wrestling, but this whole "everyone works hurt" excuse is worrying. That really shouldn't be the way things are in 2014. I mean obviously due to the nature of the business I assume you pretty much have to work through some amount of pain, but wrestling through legit injuries, and being EXPECTED to do so is not a good thing. I can see why that would make people miserable.
Looking at how throwaway this entire month has been/will continue to be, I don't see how an off season would be particularly damaging to the business.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 4, 2014 14:11:58 GMT -5
I much prefer this response to the lame Twitter one.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:40:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2014 14:12:50 GMT -5
What did Ryback say? Can't watch.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 4, 2014 14:17:56 GMT -5
What did Ryback say? Can't watch. That he's sorry Punk feels that way because that's not how it happened. He says that if he's as dangerous as Punk claims, he wouldn't be in there with John Cena or Dolph Ziggler. He does say that he respects his opinion and right to say how he feels and he wishes good things for him.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:40:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2014 14:19:15 GMT -5
What did Ryback say? Can't watch.[/quote That he's sorry Punk feels that way because that's not how it happened. He says that if he's as dangerous as Punk claims, he wouldn't be in there with John Cena or Dolph Ziggler. He does say that he respects his opinion and right to say how he feels and he wishes good things for him. Thanks. Nothing about the steroid thing?
|
|
WWE Common Terry
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 17, 2003 13:48:53 GMT -5
Posts: 3,803
|
Post by WWE Common Terry on Dec 4, 2014 14:19:42 GMT -5
He called Punk a liar, but wished him well. He also referred to Dolph as a top star, so clearly he's being a company man.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:40:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2014 14:41:46 GMT -5
didn't Colt Cabana upload this on this YouTube channel.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Giggs' Munchies on Dec 4, 2014 14:42:00 GMT -5
I don't think that WWE could ever really trust Punk to be the top guy. Of course they could trust him to be a great wrestler, and have great matches, and be a good talker too. But I don't think they could trust him to be a safe top guy for them. By that I mean that they couldn't give him the ball and know that he'll be happy with whatever as long as he's a top guy and he'll stick around for 10 years. With Punk the feeling was always, even when he was happy, that he wasn't sticking around forever. When WWE gave Cena the ball we all knew that he'd be around for 10+ years at least, barring a career ending injury. With Punk, had he been push to the moon, did anyone really think he'd still be working full time in 2016, let alone 2021? Did anyone think that he would happily have the brutal WWE schedule PLUS a massive media schedule and be happy about it for a large amount of time? Really, does anyone think that Punk would ever be happy? Even if he was given the world? I don't think so. I think if he was given everything he'd asked for he'd just do a couple more years and then retire. I think WWE thought that too, and decided that they weren't gonna give him the ball if he wasn't gonna run with it for more than a couple of years. Punk says he wants to be the #1 guy, but he never comes across as willing to deal with all the stuff that came with it - stuff that Hogan, Rock, Cena and even Austin embraced. And before someone says that Rock and Austin (by the time he was at the top) weren't around very long, that was totally different. No one knew Rock would become a massive movie star at the start and by the time he did go he left with Vince's blessing because he wanted Rock to be the first star to successfully transition from wrestling into mainstream media. As for Austin, no one knew he would his neck up. Both guys looked like (on paper at least) that they would be top stars for years and years; it just didn't work out that way. Punk never looked like (IMO at least) he would stick around for more than a few years if he actually got everything he wanted. Also, if he says he was convinced that he could force his way into the WM event, and then the next night he said to Vince that he was screwing up Bryan's time, was he convinced he could make the main event Bryan vs. Punk (I assume he would expect to turn heel again then) or a fatal four way for the title? Or did he only think Bryan should be in the main event once he accepted that he wasn't getting it? Not having a go, genuinely curious.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Dec 4, 2014 15:00:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kingnothing ~ Hardwired... on Dec 4, 2014 16:02:36 GMT -5
I don't think that WWE could ever really trust Punk to be the top guy. Of course they could trust him to be a great wrestler, and have great matches, and be a good talker too. But I don't think they could trust him to be a safe top guy for them. By that I mean that they couldn't give him the ball and know that he'll be happy with whatever as long as he's a top guy and he'll stick around for 10 years. With Punk the feeling was always, even when he was happy, that he wasn't sticking around forever.
When WWE gave Cena the ball we all knew that he'd be around for 10+ years at least, barring a career ending injury. With Punk, had he been push to the moon, did anyone really think he'd still be working full time in 2016, let alone 2021? Did anyone think that he would happily have the brutal WWE schedule PLUS a massive media schedule and be happy about it for a large amount of time? Really, does anyone think that Punk would ever be happy? Even if he was given the world? I don't think so. I think if he was given everything he'd asked for he'd just do a couple more years and then retire. I think WWE thought that too, and decided that they weren't gonna give him the ball if he wasn't gonna run with it for more than a couple of years. Punk says he wants to be the #1 guy, but he never comes across as willing to deal with all the stuff that came with it - stuff that Hogan, Rock, Cena and even Austin embraced. And before someone says that Rock and Austin (by the time he was at the top) weren't around very long, that was totally different. No one knew Rock would become a massive movie star at the start and by the time he did go he left with Vince's blessing because he wanted Rock to be the first star to successfully transition from wrestling into mainstream media. As for Austin, no one knew he would his neck up. Both guys looked like (on paper at least) that they would be top stars for years and years; it just didn't work out that way. Punk never looked like (IMO at least) he would stick around for more than a few years if he actually got everything he wanted. Also, if he says he was convinced that he could force his way into the WM event, and then the next night he said to Vince that he was screwing up Bryan's time, was he convinced he could make the main event Bryan vs. Punk (I assume he would expect to turn heel again then) or a fatal four way for the title? Or did he only think Bryan should be in the main event once he accepted that he wasn't getting it? Not having a go, genuinely curious. That's been my feeling for sometime after he re-signed in 2011, and it was reinforced by his documentary. Punk did it his way. No one was going to tell him what to say or how to perform and that was that. He got to the top on his own. Unfortunately, when you don't show your bosses you can play the "yes man" at all, it's hard for them go all in with you. It's fine to say they short-changed him during his long title run, but it seems to me they tested the waters to see if he could become more of a company man behind the scenes during the early days of that reign, and it's clear that he did not. He doesn't seem to like fans all that much unless they're opinions are in lock step with his. He also prefers to live a normal life and not be bothered by people seeking an autograph or a photo; the polar-opposite of how stars live. Yes, I know, someone can tell me he was never going to take center stage with the Rock/Cena program happening. Please tell me that if you were in charge and the Rock called and said he was willing to work a program on some Raws and do a couple of PPVs with John Cena that you would tell him no thanks, we're killing the ratings with a new guy; maybe next year?
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 4, 2014 17:21:28 GMT -5
Good Ol' JR chimed in while on the Busted Open satellite radio show ....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 19:40:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 4, 2014 18:09:40 GMT -5
Enjoyed Part II a lot. Not as good as Part I, but still very interesting. To pick up on what Punk said on one of them, I definitely agree there should be a union for the wrestlers. If the NFL can have it, WWE should. If they truly cared about the wellbeing of their wrestlers, something like this would have been added years ago.
|
|
|
Post by The Real Valbroski on Dec 4, 2014 18:30:09 GMT -5
props to Ryback for taking the high road, regardless of whatever is true.
|
|