Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 15:07:57 GMT -5
Yoko took out Hogan and lost to Bret. Eddie beat Brock. Small guys beat Big Show all the time. Pro wrestling. You don't say? It's all how they've booked Brock over the past year. It makes absolutely no sense for Lesnar to destroy Big Show, break the streak, and destroy Cena thus winning the title and making him the biggest monster in the last 10-15 years only to end up losing to a little 5'10" guy who just came off a career threatening injury. WWE won't invest that into Daniel Bryan and I don't blame him. The guy who beats Brock will get a rub ten times over what a rub from Bryan will do if Bryan is the one to beat Brock. I know it's pro wrestling, but how some of you don't get the real logic in this is beyond me. Yes, but your "logic" is based on why they won't put Bryan over Brock. I was commenting on your comment saying it wouldn't be believable if Bryan beat Brock. Two completely different things. It's pro wrestling. Most things that happen aren't really too believable in real life. But they make it work. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 31, 2014 15:08:01 GMT -5
It's  ing professional wrestling. Believability went out the window long ago. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 15:24:34 GMT -5
It's ing professional wrestling. Believability went out the window long ago. As did logic. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 15:26:20 GMT -5
^^ So they might as well put Torito over Brock then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 31, 2014 15:35:36 GMT -5
I don't see why not since people are acting like Daniel Bryan going over Brock Lesnar is the equivalent.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Dec 31, 2014 15:38:34 GMT -5
This thread is intellectually- disabled. Bryan beat HHH, who beat Brock, who went on to beat Orton/Batista later that night. Same with Cena, who lost clean to Bryan for the first time in years. Bryan is a FAR more believable choice for Brock compared to Roman, who has had 1 match with Orton, Fandango, Big Show. This is WM, not a throwaway PPV,
|
|
Starscream
Superstar
"In my restless dreams. I see that town...."
Joined on: Sept 9, 2009 20:11:52 GMT -5
Posts: 544 
|
Post by Starscream on Dec 31, 2014 15:49:48 GMT -5
Have people even seem Daniel Bryan's work? The guy had matches with freaking Takeshi Morishima, someone who in real life would kill Daniel, but he made the match believable, made it entertaining. That's what it's all about.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 15:50:22 GMT -5
So you're telling me Undertaker isn't really a supernatural zombie?
|
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Dec 31, 2014 16:04:02 GMT -5
Last time we saw Bryan vs Cena. . What happened again? Daniel Bryan beat Cena. In no way was it one sided. Cena also was out of action afterwards for a couple of months due to injury. So he had to drop the belt. What happened when Brock has faced Cena? Do you recall SummerSlam 2014? Okay. I do. I also recall NOC2014. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 16:40:57 GMT -5
I'm laughing at the people who think Bryan could "believably" beat Brock being as Brock beat the #1 star in WWE, who Vince happens to love, John Cena in the most lopsided title match in a very very long time. They let their golden boy get decimated by Brock but they'll let a guy they don't think near as much of beat him at Wrestlemania? Last time we saw Bryan vs Cena. . What happened again? Bryan beat a one armed Cena. They built the match around Cena's elbow hyping how hurt he was, lol. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 16:43:00 GMT -5
It's ing professional wrestling. Believability went out the window long ago. It is the reality era according to HHH and reality is that Bryan would get crushed by Brock whether it be real life or in the ring. |
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Dec 31, 2014 16:45:22 GMT -5
Last time we saw Bryan vs Cena. . What happened again? Bryan beat a one armed Cena. They built the match around Cena's elbow hyping how hurt he was, lol. No they didn't. Cena mentioned it once, then went on to mention that it was no excuse after he lost. Bryan never even touched the damn elbow in the match except maybe once. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 31, 2014 16:46:25 GMT -5
It's ing professional wrestling. Believability went out the window long ago. It is the reality era according to HHH and reality is that Bryan would get crushed by Brock whether it be real life or in the ring. JBL is trying to pass off El Torito as a legitimate miniature twerking bull. reality. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 16:50:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Dec 31, 2014 16:51:34 GMT -5
Touché, though it wasn't made to be much of a big deal in the match itself. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 17:06:48 GMT -5
Have people even seem Daniel Bryan's work? The guy had matches with freaking Takeshi Morishima, someone who in real life would kill Daniel, but he made the match believable, made it entertaining. That's what it's all about. His ROH work has literally zero to do with his WWE standing kayfabe wise. Not one bit. No one is denying the match would be good, it's the logic behind it. It makes no sense to take Bryan, who just recovered from an injury that easily could have ended his career, and stepping in to face a guy like Brock in a match that is undoubtedly going to be hard hitting. There's legit reason for concern throwing Bryan into the match after only just recovering. Not to mention, yes, Bryan beat HHH and Cena cleanly. Fine, say what you want, but kayfabe wise, why would he stand a chance against a guy like Brock who attacks with brute force and has seemingly unlimited stamina? It doesn't make sense. It also doesn't make sense to have Bryan beat Lesnar. Bryan is already a star, and beating Brock would be a HUGE deal and make a star almost instantly. There is no reason, absolutely no reason whatsoever to waste it on Bryan. And I'm a big Daniel Bryan fan, but it's not something that should happen this year. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 17:07:02 GMT -5
If Bryan does face Brock I would want Undertaker to run interference whether it be just his music playing, him watching at ringside, or preferably getting in the ring and attacking Brock after Heyman runs interference for Brock. It could give Bryan the advantage and would be just enough to distract Brock for Bryan to get back into the fight and win. That would be way more believable than Bryan pinning Brock clean.
Even with Taker running interference I still would take Brock to win over Bryan though so....
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 31, 2014 17:11:02 GMT -5
Eddie Guerrero- 5' 8" "220" lbs Daniel Bryan- 5' 10" "210" lbs One of the greatest moments in modern wrestling history was Eddie pinning Brock for the WWE Title at No Way Out 2004 so everyone can now STFU about Bryan "not being a threat to Lesnar". That argument is officially closed by Chip. Prior to UFC.. Post UFC... Big difference. People remember him being UFC undisputed heavyweight champion.. So before you say people need to stfu how about you use a little common sense. Oh yeah. Goldberg interfered too I know you're new here, and this probably doesn't matter to you, nor should it...but from what I've seen so far, I really don't like you. You come off as a standoffish know it all, who puts down the people who don't agree with his opinion. Your words aren't gospel, have a conversation without telling people to "stfu." It would be much appreciated. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 17:21:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 31, 2014 17:20:26 GMT -5
Prior to UFC.. Post UFC... Big difference. People remember him being UFC undisputed heavyweight champion.. So before you say people need to stfu how about you use a little common sense. Oh yeah. Goldberg interfered too I know you're new here, and this probably doesn't matter to you, nor should it...but from what I've seen so far, I really don't like you. You come off as a standoffish know it all, who puts down the people who don't agree with his opinion. Your words aren't gospel, have a conversation without telling people to "stfu." It would be much appreciated. In his defense Chip told everyone to "stfu" about people who say Bryan not being a threat to Lesnar... and saying the arguement is closed by himself.... yeah.... So.... Anyways I like Bryan. Will I come on here screaming and crying if he faces Brock and wins? No. It will be a good match and as people said earlier if told correctly it could be great. If WWE really are in the reality era and want to build up a NEW star, not an established one, I rather see Rollins, Reigns, or Ambrose take down Brock instead of a man who wrestling in this match could be a threat to his in ring career and his life after wrestling. Now if Bryan can go for it, sure, but it is still a risk. |
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Dec 31, 2014 17:25:38 GMT -5
Goddamn this thread.
|
|
