Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:30:45 GMT -5
 When people refer to the "IWC", they're referring to a small or large part of people based on what they're arguing. They aren't referring to them as a whole. It's like when people say "I hate people!", they're obviously still going to have friends and many others that they like. |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 23, 2015 2:31:52 GMT -5
It's about time someone stepped up and looked like a challenge to Cena's spot. Congratulations, Roman Reigns. I just don´t get it. Why do they booked the match to begin with? Because the Rumble butthurt set up an interesting conflict, and this was a much better prospect than Reigns vs Big Show or Reigns and Cena vs Big Show and Rollins or whatever the hell else they could have booked to main event this show. They turned a nothing B-show into an important show. Plus it saves on Wfigs server space because nobody (with a brain) will make "Roman Reigns has never had a good singles match" posts anymore. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:32:22 GMT -5
When people refer to the "IWC", they're referring to a small or large part of people based on what they're arguing. They aren't referring to them as a whole. It's like when people say "I hate people!", they're obviously still going to have friends and many others that they like. ....That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. |
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Feb 23, 2015 2:34:38 GMT -5
It's about time someone stepped up and looked like a challenge to Cena's spot. Congratulations, Roman Reigns. I just don´t get it. Why do they booked the match to begin with? Because the Rumble butthurt set up an interesting conflict, and this was a much better prospect than Reigns vs Big Show or Reigns and Cena vs Big Show and Rollins or whatever the hell else they could have booked to main event this show. They turned a nothing B-show into an important show. Plus it saves on Wfigs server space because nobody (with a brain) will make "Roman Reigns has never had a good singles match" posts anymore. Yea, it went from none to one. Can't wait for the Mania main event!! |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:36:12 GMT -5
When people refer to the "IWC", they're referring to a small or large part of people based on what they're arguing. They aren't referring to them as a whole. It's like when people say "I hate people!", they're obviously still going to have friends and many others that they like. ....That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Yes, it is. People aren't referring to every single wrestling fan that also owns internet when they're complaining about the IWC. They may be apart of the IWC, but they aren't referring to the IWC as a whole. They're referring to a small part of it. In that case it's Daniel Bryan fans. |
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Feb 23, 2015 2:38:51 GMT -5
....That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Yes, it is. People aren't referring to every single wrestling fan that also owns internet when they're complaining about the IWC. They may be apart of the IWC, but they aren't referring to the IWC as a whole. They're referring to a small part of it. In that case it's Daniel Bryan fans. How convenient. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:39:24 GMT -5
....That's not how this works. That's not how any of this works. Yes, it is. People aren't referring to every single wrestling fan that also owns internet when they're complaining about the IWC. They may be apart of the IWC, but they aren't referring to the IWC as a whole. They're referring to a small part of it. In that case it's Daniel Bryan fans. There's millions of different people in the IWC. Nearly everyone complains about something one time or another. So there's no need to get bent out of shape about it. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:41:22 GMT -5
Yes, it is. People aren't referring to every single wrestling fan that also owns internet when they're complaining about the IWC. They may be apart of the IWC, but they aren't referring to the IWC as a whole. They're referring to a small part of it. In that case it's Daniel Bryan fans. There's millions of different people in the IWC. Nearly everyone complains about something one time or another. So there's no need to get bent out of shape about it. Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 23, 2015 2:42:28 GMT -5
When people refer to the "IWC", they're referring to a small or large part of people based on what they're arguing. They aren't referring to them as a whole. The best thing to do is to specify and use a collective term that applies only to the people you're arguing with. I quite like Dirtsheep, although I only just thought of it now while writing the previous sentence. Hmm. Fair point. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:44:53 GMT -5
There's millions of different people in the IWC. Nearly everyone complains about something one time or another. So there's no need to get bent out of shape about it. Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online If Bryan won tonight, Reigns marks would be bitching. Reigns won and now Reigns haters are bitching. If it was a no contest due to interference, somebody would be bitching about something else. It's the internet, people bitch. It's basically what social media is for these days. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:45:33 GMT -5
When people refer to the "IWC", they're referring to a small or large part of people based on what they're arguing. They aren't referring to them as a whole. The best thing to do is to specify and use a collective term that applies only to the people you're arguing with. I quite like Dirtsheep, although I only just thought of it now while writing the previous sentence. Hmm. Fair point. I like it. Assuming it refers to the people who believe in everything the dirt sheets say? |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:46:31 GMT -5
There's millions of different people in the IWC. Nearly everyone complains about something one time or another. So there's no need to get bent out of shape about it. Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online Then ignore it and move on. Once you log out of wfigs it has no affect on you. There's nothing wrong with a little "complaining". Well thought out criticism should be welcome,a forum is made for that. However, no one wants to see the typical "Never watching again posts". But why worry about it? It shouldn't let you affect how you feel about something, just glaze over it and move on. Or add your thoughts to the topic in a constructive, respectable way. It's no biggie. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:49:48 GMT -5
Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online If Bryan won tonight, Reigns marks would be bitching. Reigns won and now Reigns haters are bitching. If it was a no contest due to interference, somebody would be bitching about something else. It's the internet, people bitch. It's basically what social media is for these days. I know, I should probably clear up that when I said "in this case it's Bryan fans", I was referring to the picture I originally quoted about the IWC, because in that photo the guy was complaining about Bryan and Ziggler fans, not me myself. I'm a huge fan of Bryan, and I totally agree with you and have already explained that there's always going to be bitching in every situation |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:50:59 GMT -5
Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online Then ignore it and move on. Once you log out of wfigs it has no affect on you. There's nothing wrong with a little "complaining". Well thought out criticism should be welcome,a forum is made for that. However, no one wants to see the typical "Never watching again posts". But why worry about it? It shouldn't let you affect how you feel about something, just glaze over it and move on. Or add your thoughts to the topic in a constructive, respectable way. It's no biggie. I'm not referring to me, personally. I was referring to the guy in the photo  , I bitch just as much as anyone, and I personally don't use the term "IWC", I single out a group using a specific name, I was just speaking on behalf of those who do say stuff like "The IWC should stop complaining" etc |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:51:30 GMT -5
Then ignore it and move on. Once you log out of wfigs it has no affect on you. There's nothing wrong with a little "complaining". Well thought out criticism should be welcome,a forum is made for that. However, no one wants to see the typical "Never watching again posts". But why worry about it? It shouldn't let you affect how you feel about something, just glaze over it and move on. Or add your thoughts to the topic in a constructive, respectable way. It's no biggie. I'm not referring to me, personally. I was referring to the guy in the photo , I bitch just as much as anyone, and I personally don't use the term "IWC", I single out a group using a specific name, I was just speaking on behalf of those who do say stuff like "The IWC should stop complaining" etc And I was generally speaking to everyone. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:53:20 GMT -5
I'm not referring to me, personally. I was referring to the guy in the photo , I bitch just as much as anyone, and I personally don't use the term "IWC", I single out a group using a specific name, I was just speaking on behalf of those who do say stuff like "The IWC should stop complaining" etc And I was generally speaking to everyone. Ah, makes sense |
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 23, 2015 2:54:44 GMT -5
There was always going to be bitching, and there was always going to be gloating. You can't have one without the other. It's an institute you can't disparage. Ask the local gentry, and they will say it's... OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online It's about time someone stepped up and looked like a challenge to Cena's spot. Congratulations, Roman Reigns. Because the Rumble butthurt set up an interesting conflict, and this was a much better prospect than Reigns vs Big Show or Reigns and Cena vs Big Show and Rollins or whatever the hell else they could have booked to main event this show. They turned a nothing B-show into an important show. Plus it saves on Wfigs server space because nobody (with a brain) will make "Roman Reigns has never had a good singles match" posts anymore. Yea, it went from none to one. Can't wait for the Mania main event!! Same here! The empire begins. The best thing to do is to specify and use a collective term that applies only to the people you're arguing with. I quite like Dirtsheep, although I only just thought of it now while writing the previous sentence. Hmm. Fair point. I like it. Assuming it refers to the people who believe in everything the dirt sheets say? Pretty much -- it's slightly problematic, because it's more to do with hivemind opinion stuff rather than believing every rumour published in newsletters/online... But it works well enough for now. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 15, 2024 14:05:47 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2015 2:55:14 GMT -5
Anyways, Roman stepped it up tonight. I'm just not sure if he'll actually beat Brock. Very interested in seeing where it goes.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Feb 23, 2015 2:55:26 GMT -5
If people want to complain about a specific subset of fans, they should call out that specific subset. When someone broadly insults the IWC, I believe the sentiment behind it is clear: "I feel superior to this group, so I'm going to pretend that I'm not a part of it and make fun of it to make myself feel even more superior."
|
|
|
|
Post by Hulk Who? on Feb 23, 2015 2:57:31 GMT -5
There's millions of different people in the IWC. Nearly everyone complains about something one time or another. So there's no need to get bent out of shape about it. Ik, but people are still going to complain, and then people will complain about them complaining and so on, and eventually it just leads to someone referring to a small batch of people complaining as "the IWC", they're not referring to the IWC as a whole Basically, if our favourites don't win we complain online That is not how a word works. Internet wrestling community, very much means internet wrestling community. Words don't convey your meaning, they are meaning. If you don't choose words wisely you end up with people who say things like "do you know what I mean?" A LOT, but we will have no idea what they mean and they won't either. I said IWC but I didn't mean IWC. I ordered a hamburger, but I didn't mean a hamburger. I don't care all that much about Bryan really, but I think a lot of people cheering on Roman right now are just trolls who want to watch a train wreck and laugh at everyone upset about it. |
|
