mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,298
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 24, 2015 18:49:32 GMT -5
Sorry but I dont want to see Bryan vs Lesnar either. I knew it wouldnt happen and regardless of this latest situation it still wont happen. Bryan is not a credible opponent to go up against Brock. Quote me, because after WM Ill be proven right. I made a similar thread and it got locked because all the internet Daniel Bryan fan boys kept moaning but i guess WWE agreed with me. I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. |
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,298
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 24, 2015 18:53:31 GMT -5
Sorry but I dont want to see Bryan vs Lesnar either. I knew it wouldnt happen and regardless of this latest situation it still wont happen. Bryan is not a credible opponent to go up against Brock. Quote me, because after WM Ill be proven right. I made a similar thread and it got locked because all the internet Daniel Bryan fan boys kept moaning but i guess WWE agreed with me. I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. And another thing, you say you dont want to be dragged into my argument and have the cheek to say im talking nonsense when clearly the WWE are supporting my argument much more than yours. Im not talking nonsense. Im talking business sense and you are too foolish to see it. |
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Feb 24, 2015 18:55:40 GMT -5
I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. Then who do you think is a credible threat Lesnar at this point? Certainly not the guy who struggled with beating Fandango in his return match right? That same guy who just lost to the Big Show that Lesnar tore apart in seconds. |
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Feb 24, 2015 18:57:32 GMT -5
I agree it's probably a money thing. For what it's worth I don't really see him going back to UFC, although I could easily be wrong on that. Just for the sake of argument if I'm right, after Wrestlemania Brock doesn't have a job. If UFC was a bargaining chip and WWE didn't cave I can understand him being upset. He'd be in the wrong, but I could understand nonetheless. On the other hand, how much money does one man need to show up once every two or three months? He's still likely making more in one year than I will in five. On the other hand, WWE likely shot themselves in the foot by setting a precedent. Whoever said more dates, less money was probably spot on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Feb 24, 2015 18:59:59 GMT -5
No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. Then who do you think is a credible threat Lesnar at this point? Certainly not the guy who struggled with beating Fandango in his return match right? That same guy who just lost to the Big Show that Lesnar tore apart in seconds. You mean that same guy who just beat Daniel Bryan who beat Triple H who beat Lesnar? If you're using Word's "Bryan beat Triple H who beat Lesnar" logic, at least stick to it. |
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Feb 24, 2015 19:00:00 GMT -5
I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. And another thing, you say you dont want to be dragged into my argument and have the cheek to say im talking nonsense when clearly the WWE are supporting my argument much more than yours. Im not talking nonsense. Im talking business sense and you are too foolish to see it. Whatever man.. Go tell someone that cares. |
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Feb 24, 2015 19:03:05 GMT -5
I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. And another thing, you say you dont want to be dragged into my argument and have the cheek to say im talking nonsense when clearly the WWE are supporting my argument much more than yours. Im not talking nonsense. Im talking business sense and you are too foolish to see it.  |
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,298
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 24, 2015 19:05:15 GMT -5
No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. Then who do you think is a credible threat Lesnar at this point? Certainly not the guy who struggled with beating Fandango in his return match right? That same guy who just lost to the Big Show that Lesnar tore apart in seconds.  Get Blackman in there with his nunchucks and beat the diverticulitis out of Lesnar. |
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Feb 24, 2015 19:06:59 GMT -5
Then who do you think is a credible threat Lesnar at this point? Certainly not the guy who struggled with beating Fandango in his return match right? That same guy who just lost to the Big Show that Lesnar tore apart in seconds. You mean that same guy who just beat Daniel Bryan who beat Triple H who beat Lesnar? If you're using Word's "Bryan beat Triple H who beat Lesnar" logic, at least stick to it. Fine. The guy who struggles in the ring with Fandango, Kane, and Show on a weekly basis. The guy who has six months worth of singles experience. There's not going to be any hot tags come Mania time. I'll say it again I'm a fan of him but he's got sooo much to work on. |
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Feb 24, 2015 19:20:29 GMT -5
As to why Brock wasn't on RAW it could have been anything. Maybe he got sick? Or his diverticulitis flared up? It could have been anything so I'm not worried about it. Sorry but I dont want to see Bryan vs Lesnar either. I knew it wouldnt happen and regardless of this latest situation it still wont happen. Bryan is not a credible opponent to go up against Brock. Quote me, because after WM Ill be proven right.
I made a similar thread and it got locked because all the internet Daniel Bryan fan boys kept moaning but i guess WWE agreed with me. i call BS I don't. I like Bryan alot and have never been a fan of Brock...but when I watch wrestling I want a little bit of credibility to it. Sure I was able to believe Bryan and the underdog aspect last year. Because you had Triple H being over confident heel in the first match. And then being able to overcome Orton and Batista in the main event, because you knew Orton and Batista would be at odds also. So that had some believability to it. But not one on one against Brock. To expect me to believe Bryan after missing a most the year to the neck injury has a chance to beat a real life bad a$$ who has been built up as this unstoppable monster since coming back from the UFC is totally unbelievable. Especially when Bryan's appeal is being the underdog...If he beats Brock cleanly than he'll never be considered an underdog again. And then the fans will more than likely turn on him. The best thing they could do is have Brock and Roman have an old fashion brawl where Rollins cashes in on a worn out winner at the end. Then you have title matches set up for the year for Rollins against Orton, Reigns, Brock (if he resigns) and Bryan where they are all underdogs against the Authority backed Rollins. To me that is better than Bryan having another WM moment by beating Brock cleanly in the Main Event. Plus the wwe woudn't have given in to the ICW which is good or every year they'd have to deal with these fans who ruin it for others because they aren't getting their way. |
|
hbkfan
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 8:00:29 GMT -5
Posts: 503
|
Post by hbkfan on Feb 24, 2015 19:28:34 GMT -5
Let's not forget Brock was handed the WWE title on a silver platter during his first run as well. Almost instantly. So for all those saying Lesnar is upset about Roman not earning it, who the flying f*** would Brock be to judge anyone? Was about to mention this. Brock had done nothing but squashing people around before he got the strap from the rock at summer slam. If this is the case I recommend him to remember a similar situation he had with Austin during his first run. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:38:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:32:28 GMT -5
Maybe nothing happened at all and they just kept him off TV.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Feb 24, 2015 19:42:46 GMT -5
I don't care dude.. I really don't care.. Don't drag me into your WFigs bitterness because you think it's hip to dislike one of the best wrestlers in the world.. And that's against anybody. Daniel Bryan can beat Triple H.. Who beat Brock Lesnar.. Beat Batista and Randy Orton.. But he is not a credible opponent against Brock Lesnar. You're talking non sense. No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. WRESTLING ISN'T REAL AND "CREDIBILITY" DOES NOT MATTER. Bryan didn't win the Rumble because WWE decided, at least six months ago, that Roman was winning come hell or high water. Has nothing to do with "credibility". Give me a break. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:38:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:45:25 GMT -5
No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. WRESTLING ISN'T REAL AND "CREDIBILITY" DOES NOT MATTER. Bryan didn't win the Rumble because WWE decided, at least six months ago, that Roman was winning come hell or high water. Has nothing to do with "credibility". Give me a break. This. You can build anybody to be "credible" if you want to. They could legitimately build a guy like Ryder as a threat within a few months with the right booking. Anybody and everybody can be credible in professional wrestling. |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Feb 24, 2015 19:49:11 GMT -5
Let's not forget Brock was handed the WWE title on a silver platter during his first run as well. Almost instantly. So for all those saying Lesnar is upset about Roman not earning it, who the flying f*** would Brock be to judge anyone? Was about to mention this. Brock had done nothing but squashing people around before he got the strap from the rock at summer slam. If this is the case I recommend him to remember a similar situation he had with Austin during his first run. Plus who put Brock over for the WWE title? The Rock. Roman's cousin. So I'm sure Brock has no issue returning the favor. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:38:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:49:27 GMT -5
Maybe nothing happened at all and they just kept him off TV. Possible but I sure as hell wouldn't want to be the guy to say to him 10 minutes before the show "Hey Brock we got you out here tonight but we've changed our mind and want to save your appearance for next week" Although it would be sweet if he shows up on next weeks RAW in NJ. |
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,298
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Feb 24, 2015 19:51:15 GMT -5
No no no. I didnt say im not a fan of Bryan, i like the guy and WWE is better for having him around, hes a great wrestler. But dude...he aint beating Lesnar after how WWE have built him up. Your saying how he beat HHH and others like that warrants some sort of validity or relevancy but it doesnt. That sort of argument can trickle down through the years and never end. We will soon see who WWE will agree with and if he is a credible opponent for Lesnar then why didnt he win the the rumble?? or beat reigns at Fastlane? why? Because it would be BS for him to go over Lesnar. WRESTLING ISN'T REAL AND "CREDIBILITY" DOES NOT MATTER. Bryan didn't win the Rumble because WWE decided, at least six months ago, that Roman was winning come hell or high water. Has nothing to do with "credibility". Give me a break. LOL. You just dont get it. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 17, 2024 23:38:45 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2015 19:58:56 GMT -5
WRESTLING ISN'T REAL AND "CREDIBILITY" DOES NOT MATTER. Bryan didn't win the Rumble because WWE decided, at least six months ago, that Roman was winning come hell or high water. Has nothing to do with "credibility". Give me a break. LOL. You just dont get it. Other way around, broski. |
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Feb 24, 2015 20:02:21 GMT -5
WRESTLING ISN'T REAL AND "CREDIBILITY" DOES NOT MATTER. Bryan didn't win the Rumble because WWE decided, at least six months ago, that Roman was winning come hell or high water. Has nothing to do with "credibility". Give me a break. This. You can build anybody to be "credible" if you want to. They could legitimately build a guy like Ryder as a threat within a few months with the right booking. Anybody and everybody can be credible in professional wrestling. I don't buy that at all. I am 6'5" 47 year old with a serious back injury and can tell you I look at a guy like Brock and believe he'd destroy me. But then there's Rusev who probably could destroy me also, but when I watch him I just don't believe it. I don't believe he's this monster who could beat me let alone 90% of the roster. And he's been being built as an unbeatable monster for how long? |
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Feb 24, 2015 20:03:42 GMT -5
Are people still saying that it isn't believeable that Bryan can beat Brock? Seriously?
The reason why it's believable that Bryan could beat Brock is very, very simple: he can out-wrestle him. Who was the last guy to nearly beat Brock before he got the mega-push? That skinny-fatass from Chicago. How? By out-wrestling Brock - in fact, he would've won without Heyman's interference. Of course Bryan can't match Brock's power - which is why it's laughable to me that people say Roman beating him is MORE believable, since that's his whole offense - but Bryan can take out a body part, and wear down The Beast (just like Eddie Guerrero). If anything, the thought that Roman can out-muscle Lesnar, when he made Super Cena look like a little bitch, is the far more outlandish idea.
|
|
