|
Post by TheSystem 1.5 on Dec 22, 2015 18:34:08 GMT -5
What changed is what matters the most. The fans opinion. For both situations. And if you can't accept that, then I don't know what to tell you. But I'm finished here. Have fun. Well duh...obviously the fans opinion changed, I'm asking why they couldn't of had the same opinion going into the rumble so WWE weren't forced to change plans. Don't know what makes you feel this thread isn't serious when I've presented a legit arguement, but whatever, can't please everybody. Reigns was being pushed despite fans negative reaction torwards him and clear preference to other wrestlers. At The Rumble fan favorites were tossed out left and right as an obvious middle finger to the fans for not supporting Vinces guy.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Dec 22, 2015 18:35:47 GMT -5
People only started booing him at the Royal Rumble. Before that he got huge pops. For instance last year at the Slammys when he won superstar of the year he didn't get 1 boo.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 23:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2015 18:37:42 GMT -5
Well duh...obviously the fans opinion changed, I'm asking why they couldn't of had the same opinion going into the rumble so WWE weren't forced to change plans. Don't know what makes you feel this thread isn't serious when I've presented a legit arguement, but whatever, can't please everybody. Reigns was being pushed despite fans negative reaction torwards him and clear preference to other wrestlers. At The Rumble fan favorites were tossed out left and right as an obvious middle finger to the fans for not supporting Vinces guy. Yeah, but it's not like he was only booed then, even after Mania when he took Zigglers spot or whoever smarks wanted, he was still booed many times. Why? It's not like they've only been pushing him now that he's been getting good reactions, he was bored against the title match with Ambrose at Survivor Series.
|
|
|
Post by Weemanv1 on Dec 22, 2015 19:04:37 GMT -5
I'm surprised and slightly worried that it took until the second page for something like this to come up.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 23:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2015 19:12:39 GMT -5
I'm surprised and slightly worried that it took until the second page for something like this to come up. Why? I presented a serious arguement and had a serious discussion about it with people on the forum. What's wrong with that? Isn't this supposed to be what this forums for? Discussion? bad guy™ I'm sorry but how is what I did worthy of a warning level but this isn't? This is blatant trolling, it has no reveleance to the discussion.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 23:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2015 19:17:44 GMT -5
I'm surprised and slightly worried that it took until the second page for something like this to come up. Why? I presented a serious arguement and had a serious discussion about it with people on the forum. What's wrong with that? Isn't this supposed to be what this forums for? Discussion? To T.R.W it's mostly bewbs.
|
|
|
Post by Weemanv1 on Dec 22, 2015 19:27:43 GMT -5
I'm surprised and slightly worried that it took until the second page for something like this to come up. Why? I presented a serious arguement and had a serious discussion about it with people on the forum. What's wrong with that? Isn't this supposed to be what this forums for? Discussion? bad guy™ I'm sorry but how is what I did worthy of a warning level but this isn't? This is blatant trolling, it has no reveleance to the discussion. Not necessarily. How do you know I wasn't pointing out that someone was crap posting your thread? Maybe I was trying to help clean it up. Don't assume. You know what they say about people who assume. Wow, actually, seeing some of your other posts in other threads, I feel really stupid for feeding you and hope I don't get a warning bar for that. I'll be smarter not to reply to you anymore.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 23:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2015 19:36:26 GMT -5
Because Seth Rollins can wrestle and had a wrestling background. Roman Reigns is good looking ripped and booed going into Rumble and booed up barely until Sheamus was champ and everybody rather have Reigns than Sheamus. However Bryan is better and that shows in the crowd. Rollins ended stings career a 15 time world champion. He's the freaking man. Reigns is rocks cousin.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 23:32:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2015 19:38:11 GMT -5
Why? I presented a serious arguement and had a serious discussion about it with people on the forum. What's wrong with that? Isn't this supposed to be what this forums for? Discussion? bad guy™ I'm sorry but how is what I did worthy of a warning level but this isn't? This is blatant trolling, it has no reveleance to the discussion. Not necessarily. How do you know I wasn't pointing out that someone was crap posting your thread? Maybe I was trying to help clean it up. Don't assume. You know what they say about people who assume. Wow, actually, seeing some of your other posts in other threads, I feel really stupid for feeding you and hope I don't get a warning bar for that. I'll be smarter not to reply to you anymore. Jack Specific bad guy™ see this? Getting accused of being a troll for simply sharing my differing opinions. I did not start this and hope I do not get in trouble for simply reporting these people getting my thread off track to you.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Dec 22, 2015 19:43:54 GMT -5
I would have been here sooner, but Doc Brown set all his clocks precisely 25 minutes late. And now Strickland is looking out for me.
|
|