|
Post by Word™ on Aug 30, 2016 3:25:05 GMT -5
There is more CGI if not just as much in Ep. 7 than any given prequel. I'm not sure where this idea comes from that the prequels weren't 'practical' either. There's all sorts of makeup, costume design, set pieces, miniatures...I've never understood this argument. Does it look fantastical at times? Yup, it takes place in outer space. Love the prequels, love the originals, think there is terrible acting in both and also don't think it matters, really. That having been said, I thought Daisy Ridley was great in a movie that I unfortunately didn't love. The imagination is missing for most of it in trying to placate to too many opinions. It lacks the risks taken on creativity that all 6 other films had which means George Lucas was clearly missing. Ridley's a bright spot for sure. So much magic in the moment she pours water on to her green bread and it 'fluffs' up. These moments are featured throughout Star Wars and are what make it great, but I felt like this one was mostly missing them or just referencing ones from the past. Too many cooks in that kitchen. There is a lot of CGI in Episode 7, but it blends much, much better than the Prequels did. The Phantom Menace hadn't yet been swallowed completely by CGI, but AOTC and ROTS both were. I think a lot of Episode 7's issues were the fact that it was a literal retread of Episode 4, which I feel they did on purpose to reestablish the baseline of Star Wars after the prequels. I fully expect Episode 8 to bust out and be its own thing.I sure hope you're right. Disney likes to play it safe.
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Aug 30, 2016 9:43:43 GMT -5
There is more CGI if not just as much in Ep. 7 than any given prequel. I'm not sure where this idea comes from that the prequels weren't 'practical' either. There's all sorts of makeup, costume design, set pieces, miniatures...I've never understood this argument. Does it look fantastical at times? Yup, it takes place in outer space. Love the prequels, love the originals, think there is terrible acting in both and also don't think it matters, really. That having been said, I thought Daisy Ridley was great in a movie that I unfortunately didn't love. The imagination is missing for most of it in trying to placate to too many opinions. It lacks the risks taken on creativity that all 6 other films had which means George Lucas was clearly missing. Ridley's a bright spot for sure. So much magic in the moment she pours water on to her green bread and it 'fluffs' up. These moments are featured throughout Star Wars and are what make it great, but I felt like this one was mostly missing them or just referencing ones from the past. Too many cooks in that kitchen. There is a lot of CGI in Episode 7, but it blends much, much better than the Prequels did. The Phantom Menace hadn't yet been swallowed completely by CGI, but AOTC and ROTS both were. I think a lot of Episode 7's issues were the fact that it was a literal retread of Episode 4, which I feel they did on purpose to reestablish the baseline of Star Wars after the prequels. I fully expect Episode 8 to bust out and be its own thing. I guess it just never felt that way to me. I get characters like Ep 1 Jar Jar, Boss Nass, Dex, etc are just so fantastical it's hard at first (by Episode 3 this is all worked out...you can't go wrong with the light that shines through Yoda's ear), but the sets/locations have never, ever felt anything other than legit. I think the problem now lies in that I don't know that a 'baseline' needed to be re-established but I get what you're saying. I think it's a case of to each their own but I just can't believe that something packaged and sold to me as Star Wars left me underwhelmed like Episode 7 did still. I'm also hoping Episode 8 blows it up, but I think they could do well from taking some prequel cues in imagination and inspiration and not just hanging pod-racing banners in a hallway.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2016 23:22:28 GMT -5
Netflix has finally put 'The Force Awakens' up so I'll check that out soon...officially one of the only people that didn't see it first go-round.
😁
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Sept 13, 2016 0:12:26 GMT -5
Netflix has finally put 'The Force Awakens' up so I'll check that out soon...officially one of the only people that didn't see it first go-round. 😁 American Netflix ends up being the worst Netflix.. Canada and the UK get all the good stuff on Netflix.. We barely get anything new and fresh and exciting..
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2016 2:19:07 GMT -5
Netflix has finally put 'The Force Awakens' up so I'll check that out soon...officially one of the only people that didn't see it first go-round. 😁 American Netflix ends up being the worst Netflix.. Canada and the UK get all the good stuff on Netflix.. We barely get anything new and fresh and exciting.. Australia's lumped in there somewhere, eh? 😜
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Sept 13, 2016 9:33:18 GMT -5
Netflix has finally put 'The Force Awakens' up so I'll check that out soon...officially one of the only people that didn't see it first go-round. 😁 American Netflix ends up being the worst Netflix.. Canada and the UK get all the good stuff on Netflix.. We barely get anything new and fresh and exciting.. Having had the opportunity to see the USA & Ireland/UK Netflix I have to disagree. Netflix is absolutely crippled over here by Sky TV and its sub programme Sky Boxsets.........Sky gets 90% of movies first and holds onto it for YEARS. GOTG only came onto our Netflix a couple of months back......chew that one over. We get sweet FA......I mean the USA even gets the new series of Peaky Blinders before us and it airs on the effin BBC.. Its absolutely ridiculous and its all because of Sky wanting a 100% monopoly. Netflix is only good for its own exclusive content over here. USA Netflix gets WAY more stuff(Flash, Arrow, Supernatural to name just 3)
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Sept 15, 2016 1:04:59 GMT -5
I've noticed US Netflix gets way more stuff, especially tv related, but in Canada we tend to get some bigger movies earlier, especially Disney stuff, it seems Disney has a deal with Netflix Canada to put major titles on it a little sooner
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Sept 15, 2016 9:17:52 GMT -5
The movie selection on US Netflix is the drizzling sh*ts. Seriously, unless you watch TV Shows, I have no idea why you pay for Netflix because it's 75% B and C movies. Every once in a great while something like Snowpiercer will pop up, and ARQ looks to be another gem that will be out shortly, but there are rarely any good movies.
We watch movies on Exodus though. So we have Netflix specifically for the TV shows. I just get frustrated every time I go to find a movie on there and chances are if I was interested in watching a movie it's probably gone haha.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Sept 15, 2016 9:59:46 GMT -5
As someone who hates the prequels, I have been watching the Clone Wars cartoon (on season 3 now) and it's kind of been lessening my hate of all things prequels. The main reason I started watching it was to get caught up to Rebels for the debut of Thrawn. But so far the Clone Wars cartoon is way better than the prequel movies.
I get why some younger people don't have a problem with the prequels. And I get that some of us older folk might have been stuck in the past when it comes to the original trilogy. But in terms of feel of the universe, it was way different, and while flawed, I think that is what Episode VII got right again if nothing else. They used a lot more practical effects in episode VII. You watch the behind the scenes of the prequels and almost everything is done with CGI and I think ultimately that is why some of the performances were so bad. That and nobody had the balls to tell Lucas that things were off.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2016 10:13:26 GMT -5
As someone who hates the prequels, I have been watching the Clone Wars cartoon (on season 3 now) and it's kind of been lessening my hate of all things prequels. The main reason I started watching it was to get caught up to Rebels for the debut of Thrawn. But so far the Clone Wars cartoon is way better than the prequel movies. I get why some younger people don't have a problem with the prequels. And I get that some of us older folk might have been stuck in the past when it comes to the original trilogy. But in terms of feel of the universe, it was way different, and while flawed, I think that is what Episode VII got right again if nothing else. They used a lot more practical effects in episode VII. You watch the behind the scenes of the prequels and almost everything is done with CGI and I think ultimately that is why some of the performances were so bad. That and nobody had the balls to tell Lucas that things were off. The Clone Wars cartoon completely changed my view on Obi-Wan, by season 6 I realized that he wasn't so stuck up and strict as the Prequels made me think. The whole Satine story is abit 'aww.' Oh and Ventress is a 10/10. Would.
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Sept 15, 2016 10:50:13 GMT -5
As someone who hates the prequels, I have been watching the Clone Wars cartoon (on season 3 now) and it's kind of been lessening my hate of all things prequels. The main reason I started watching it was to get caught up to Rebels for the debut of Thrawn. But so far the Clone Wars cartoon is way better than the prequel movies. I get why some younger people don't have a problem with the prequels. And I get that some of us older folk might have been stuck in the past when it comes to the original trilogy. But in terms of feel of the universe, it was way different, and while flawed, I think that is what Episode VII got right again if nothing else. They used a lot more practical effects in episode VII. You watch the behind the scenes of the prequels and almost everything is done with CGI and I think ultimately that is why some of the performances were so bad. That and nobody had the balls to tell Lucas that things were off. Again...I'm not finding these behind the scenes where practical effects weren't at all used. I get that some people enjoy the blend better but the miniatures used, the sets, definitely the makeup...the practical effects are all there. And it's 100x more imaginative than Episode VII which gave us Tatooine, Hoth and Yavin over again but called them something 'different'. That is the first time I've ever watched something Star Wars and felt like I was on Earth, of all places. I never liked James Cameron, mostly because he's pretentious with his 'forward thinking' and Avatar sucked, but he won me back over when he called out Episode VII for exactly what it was, a re-tread. I also love how suddenly everyone turned anti-Cameron in defense of Episode VII after he spoke out. deadline.com/2016/06/james-cameron-star-wars-force-awakens-criticism-1201781204/I just don't think I'll ever get it. I have legitimately enjoyed EVERYTHING Star Wars up to this point...even Episode VII. Thankfully I am invested in the characters, so I am on board to see what happens...but it's by far the least inspired of all 7 movies. Whoever deserves the blame for that, I don't know. But as far as holding it up against the prequels in terms of effects, I would take a look at this article and the accompanying reddit thread. People can whine about the acting all they want, but really I don't see the argument here after having a look at this: makezine.com/2015/10/07/the-surprising-practical-effects-of-the-star-wars-prequels/
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Sept 15, 2016 11:22:24 GMT -5
As someone who hates the prequels, I have been watching the Clone Wars cartoon (on season 3 now) and it's kind of been lessening my hate of all things prequels. The main reason I started watching it was to get caught up to Rebels for the debut of Thrawn. But so far the Clone Wars cartoon is way better than the prequel movies. I get why some younger people don't have a problem with the prequels. And I get that some of us older folk might have been stuck in the past when it comes to the original trilogy. But in terms of feel of the universe, it was way different, and while flawed, I think that is what Episode VII got right again if nothing else. They used a lot more practical effects in episode VII. You watch the behind the scenes of the prequels and almost everything is done with CGI and I think ultimately that is why some of the performances were so bad. That and nobody had the balls to tell Lucas that things were off. Again...I'm not finding these behind the scenes where practical effects weren't at all used. I get that some people enjoy the blend better but the miniatures used, the sets, definitely the makeup...the practical effects are all there. And it's 100x more imaginative than Episode VII which gave us Tatooine, Hoth and Yavin over again but called them something 'different'. That is the first time I've ever watched something Star Wars and felt like I was on Earth, of all places. I never liked James Cameron, mostly because he's pretentious with his 'forward thinking' and Avatar sucked, but he won me back over when he called out Episode VII for exactly what it was, a re-tread. I also love how suddenly everyone turned anti-Cameron in defense of Episode VII after he spoke out. deadline.com/2016/06/james-cameron-star-wars-force-awakens-criticism-1201781204/I just don't think I'll ever get it. I have legitimately enjoyed EVERYTHING Star Wars up to this point...even Episode VII. Thankfully I am invested in the characters, so I am on board to see what happens...but it's by far the least inspired of all 7 movies. Whoever deserves the blame for that, I don't know. But as far as holding it up against the prequels in terms of effects, I would take a look at this article and the accompanying reddit thread. People can whine about the acting all they want, but really I don't see the argument here after having a look at this: makezine.com/2015/10/07/the-surprising-practical-effects-of-the-star-wars-prequels/I watched a lot of the behind the scene docs on the DVDs when they came out. It's been a long time, but they are littered with scenes of the actors in giant green screen rooms with very little to no actual props at all. I'd have to dig to find them all. I think Lucas relied too heavily on CGI in a time where the technology really wasn't ready to be used in such a manner. CGI can be wonderful when used to chance sets and moments, but an over reliance can really hurt the film. But lots of stuff like this. smg.photobucket.com/user/txkarenr/media/txkarenr2/txkarenr3/txkarenr4/SWOrder662.jpg.htmlAnd I think it hurt the performances of the actors as well. I certainly can see why people were disappointed in Episode VII being too similar to IV. I get it, and while it didn't really bother me, it wasn't quite what I expected in that regard. However I still really enjoyed it far more than I did the prequels if for no other reason that it actually "felt" like a Star Wars movie, whereas the prequels did not. Maybe that is because I am old, I couldn't say for sure.
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Sept 16, 2016 8:44:58 GMT -5
We could sit here all day and show screenshots of people behind CGI walls and people next to elaborate miniatures with examples from all 7 movies...that's also a scene of Padme riding in a space ship being transported. I guess what I don't understand is, did your enjoyment of those three movies really suffer that much because of the way this scene or a scene like this in particular was constructed? I don't know if I've ever sat in a Star Wars movie and been concerned about whether or not the car or whatever that was being driven was real? If anything I've always just kind of accepted the backdrops and been concerned with what people are saying without really thinking twice about it.
I'm 30 and these movies were released while I was in my early-late teens, which is where one would think I would be most resistant in terms of age and thinking things like this are dumb, but maybe you're right? Not sure if you're older than me or not. I watch clips of the Marvel movies these days and everyone seems to love those and I think the 'subtlety' of that CGI pales in comparison to the way Star Wars blends (all 7 as far as I'm concerned).
Also, Portman is the understated and never mentioned worst part about the prequels. At least Hayden gave it his efforts and despite the fact that people hate that Darth Vader is a whiny teenager, too bad. She phones in everything and anything she's doing in all of those movies and it's as clear as day she doesn't want to be there. Leia is the same way in Return of the Jedi. She is far and away more damaging to that whole world than Jar Jar Binks could ever be.
Anyways, just thoughts!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2016 9:09:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Sept 16, 2016 9:28:17 GMT -5
We could sit here all day and show screenshots of people behind CGI walls and people next to elaborate miniatures with examples from all 7 movies...that's also a scene of Padme riding in a space ship being transported. I guess what I don't understand is, did your enjoyment of those three movies really suffer that much because of the way this scene or a scene like this in particular was constructed? I don't know if I've ever sat in a Star Wars movie and been concerned about whether or not the car or whatever that was being driven was real? If anything I've always just kind of accepted the backdrops and been concerned with what people are saying without really thinking twice about it. I'm 30 and these movies were released while I was in my early-late teens, which is where one would think I would be most resistant in terms of age and thinking things like this are dumb, but maybe you're right? Not sure if you're older than me or not. I watch clips of the Marvel movies these days and everyone seems to love those and I think the 'subtlety' of that CGI pales in comparison to the way Star Wars blends (all 7 as far as I'm concerned). Also, Portman is the understated and never mentioned worst part about the prequels. At least Hayden gave it his efforts and despite the fact that people hate that Darth Vader is a whiny teenager, too bad. She phones in everything and anything she's doing in all of those movies and it's as clear as day she doesn't want to be there. Leia is the same way in Return of the Jedi. She is far and away more damaging to that whole world than Jar Jar Binks could ever be. Anyways, just thoughts! I'm 41 so I was in my mid to late 20's when they came out. From my experiences, people who were younger when the prequels were a lot more likely to accept them at face value than those who were older. I'm sure a lot of factors play a part in that. It's all subjective it's not like one person is more right than the other. I didn't think about how the films were made while watching them. It's more that I saw after the fact how the movies were made, and that clued me in to one of the reasons that the movies were so poorly acted. I think many factors are to blame, including becoming so preoccupied with the special effects (like Cameron did later in life) that he paid little attention to the acting and story. He didn't have enough people around him to challenge his visions and ideas. Too many stars in the movie hurt it as well, and some of them were clearly not passionate about the films and mailed it in. The only performances I thought weren't awful were McGregor, Neeson, and McDiarmid. I also don't think the technology was ready for CGI to be used as heavily as it was. I personally felt the prequel universe felt very shiny and sterile and the original trilogy had a much grittier feel to it. They didn't look or feel like Star Wars very much to me. Perhaps it is me being a grumpy old man, but it isn't like I am opposed to there being more movies. I really enjoyed episode VII and I am looking forward to Rogue One.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2016 15:48:04 GMT -5
Netflix has finally put 'The Force Awakens' up so I'll check that out soon...officially one of the only people that didn't see it first go-round. 😁 It was fantastic, wasn't it? Glad I decided to watch it. First Star Wars film I've seen since 'Return Of The Jedi'.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 17:56:41 GMT -5
Theres no defending the piles of trash the prequels were.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 2, 2024 2:44:52 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 19, 2016 19:29:50 GMT -5
Theres no defending the piles of trash the prequels were. Avoided 'em like the plague. Hell of a gap then between films for me...I saw ROTJ in '89 when I was 7...Christ, that's 27 years. 😳
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Sept 19, 2016 19:43:13 GMT -5
I am a prequel apologist. Always will be. Not as good as the original trilogy, thought Episode 3 is great. I was 9 when Episode I came out, 12 for the second and 15 for the third. They were a big part of my childhood, I watched the originals on VHS so many times I lost track, and Phantom Menace was my first time ever at a movie theater.
There is good in them. There is tons of bad, but they're fun, and at the end of the day I find them enjoyable if you focus on the positives
|
|
mrassbillygunn
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Jul 23, 2011 19:35:48 GMT -5
Posts: 4,299
|
Post by mrassbillygunn on Sept 19, 2016 20:50:11 GMT -5
Ill chip into this little debate with my simple view...for me the stars wars universe works best in animation. The Clone Wars is my fave star wars saga.
|
|