|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Jun 27, 2020 1:44:59 GMT -5
I still say it was a work.
The entire year he was back he got 'screwed.'
In Your House Dec. 96, HBK cost Bret the title against Sid, he got screwed.
Royal Rumble 97, Austin cost him the win, he got screwed.
The following night on Raw, he quits the WWF in an angle to go to WCW and then gets rehired.
Loses the WWF Title to Sid the night after he won it at IYH due to Austin, he got screwed.
Lost to Sid in the cage match due to Undertaker and Austin, he got screwed.
Then in November the final screwing takes place and that's that.
If Bret wanted to stay with the WWF so bad, then why didn't he?? He says in Wrestling With Shadows that it wasn't about the money. So then stay for less money?? I am guessing he would.
People will argue this till the end of time, and if it's a work (like I believe it is) then it's the greatest work in the wrestling business ever!
If it was a shoot?? Then it was the greatest wrestling shoot in the business ever!
Either way, it wins, and people will always be guessing and wondering about it.
|
|
nibs92
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 29, 2008 5:47:21 GMT -5
Posts: 2,357
|
Post by nibs92 on Jun 27, 2020 4:07:04 GMT -5
Working on the theory that it is a shoot I’d say McMahon screwed Bret
Some of the things that make me understand Bret’s motives:
He was given a contract that should it be broken, he would have creative control over his character in the last 30 days, which covered the Survivor Series match. Now regardless, it was tradition that the departing wrestler would do “the honourable thing” and put his opponent over on his way out. However, with the legitimate heat between himself and Shawn, I believe the Hitman didn’t think it was possible.
Apparently, Bret and Shawn had a conversation where the Hitman had said words to the effect that he would do the right thing for Shawn and Shawn said he wouldn’t reciprocate. Whether that conversation took place, I think that the Hitman believed it to be the case. Looking at the human side of that, would you, the reader, be willing to do the honours for someone that you have heat with, that has messed with your career and even your marriage (sunny days) and either told you or implied that they wouldn’t be prepared to do the right thing by you, even though you said you would for them? All the while having a legally binding contract saying you don’t have to?
McMahon seemed to back out f the contract fairly quickly after it was signed. Vince is known for taken gambles and putting it all on the line, but surely even he wouldn’t have made such a grand promise in the form of a lucrative contract, if he didn’t think there would be a good chance he could afford it long term. My guess is that he had buyers regret and realised that firstly the Hitman wasn’t worth it and secondly that Bret’s character didn’t fit the new direction. Did the Hitman really owe McMahon anything?
From McMahon’s perspective, he leads a pretty sheltered life. Working long days, seven days a week in the fantasy world of wrestling, surrounded by yes men. How in touch with reality is he? I would imagine his lawyers spend a good portion of their time trying to explain to Vince why he can’t do certain things. With written contracts being fairly new in 1997, I do wonder if he fully grasped the 30 days creative control clause. Not to doubt his intelligence, maybe just the concept that a wrestler he no longer needs could have a legal hold on him.
As much as the Hitman couldn’t legally turn up on the next days Nitro with the belt, the Lex Luger and Alundra Blayne incidents must have been playing on his mind. Even if Bret did turn go to Nitro and McMahon sued, the impact of losing the current champion to the opposition could have caused the WWF to go out of business by the time it was heard in the courts. To me the onus was on McMahon to take whatever action was necessary to get the belt back. McMahon screwed Bret.
The biggest tragedy of it was that the super hot Michaels was the tool that put Austin at the top, with the Evil McMahon proving to be the nemeses that kept him there and reinvigorating the fortunes of the WWF. Bret should have the sole figure that cranked the heat up in the Monday Night Wars. The way he was handled in WCW was pathetic.
If the whole Montreal debacle turned out to be a work, I wouldn’t be surprised. I’ve always thought that it was pretty convenient that a film crew was allowed backstage access to the still reasonably closed brotherhood of wrestling at what turned out to be not only Bret’s last year in the WWF but also finishes with one of the most controversial and talked about incidents in the history of the sport. As hbkdaddycool said, the storylines leading up to his departure were based around Bret being screwed over time and again. I mentioned earlier about Vince backing out of the 20 year contract. If I remember rightly, he played a role in helping with negotiations with his biggest competitor, who was beating him in the ratings. From what I remember as well, there didn’t seem to be much counter offers from the WWF. Surely there was room for some compromise? Just think there are some questions we’ll never have answered
|
|
Old Zeke
Main Eventer
'Fraid old Zeke, he rides up here with me. Can't trust a pig with watermelons, you know.
Joined on: Jun 24, 2019 13:46:50 GMT -5
Posts: 3,370
|
Post by Old Zeke on Jun 27, 2020 5:11:16 GMT -5
My opinion has always been this - despite Bret's personal feelings about HBK and not wanting to lose in Montreal, he was leaving the company for its main competition. He should've done business, plain and simple.
Bret DID screw Bret.
|
|
|
Post by FLUX on Jun 27, 2020 5:37:01 GMT -5
Yes.
|
|
Thunder Chunky
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 1, 2010 21:57:30 GMT -5
Posts: 4,545
|
Post by Thunder Chunky on Jun 27, 2020 12:24:10 GMT -5
Nah. Vince gave him creative control for his last 30 days. He didnt have to drop the belt to Shawn if he didnt want to.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 27, 2020 12:31:02 GMT -5
honestly, anyone who thinks bret screwed bret see's things from a far away perspective than i do. was bret naive, selfish, egotistical? sure, bigtime. but he didn't go behind anyone's backs. he was honest with a company he'd been loyal to for years, and the company was not loyal back. he was stabbed in the back.
vince, michaels, and triple h are cowards for what they did. pretty plain and simple.
and i don't believe it was a work, the only work was the extent of michael's back injury so that he could stay home getting pilled up like the loser he was.
|
|
|
Post by sonstuds on Jun 27, 2020 12:48:59 GMT -5
If the story is true that Bret told Michaels that he would never hurt him in the ring despite their dislike for one another, and Michael told him he couldn't say the same thing, then I really can't fault Bret for saying screw it and not dropping the belt to him when he had creative control.
|
|
Retrospect
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 20, 2019 16:39:04 GMT -5
Posts: 1,059
|
Post by Retrospect on Jun 27, 2020 13:03:15 GMT -5
I still say it was a work. The entire year he was back he got 'screwed.' In Your House Dec. 96, HBK cost Bret the title against Sid, he got screwed. Royal Rumble 97, Austin cost him the win, he got screwed. The following night on Raw, he quits the WWF in an angle to go to WCW and then gets rehired. Loses the WWF Title to Sid the night after he won it at IYH due to Austin, he got screwed. Lost to Sid in the cage match due to Undertaker and Austin, he got screwed. Then in November the final screwing takes place and that's that. If Bret wanted to stay with the WWF so bad, then why didn't he?? He says in Wrestling With Shadows that it wasn't about the money. So then stay for less money?? I am guessing he would. People will argue this till the end of time, and if it's a work (like I believe it is) then it's the greatest work in the wrestling business ever! If it was a shoot?? Then it was the greatest wrestling shoot in the business ever! Either way, it wins, and people will always be guessing and wondering about it. I will say that I’ve given this theory a lot of thought too. My only issue with this is the way he acted in the years following the screw job. Who knows tho. From what I understand he did like working the boys. There’s the story about how him leaving immediately after WM12 was a work/shoot to build heat. But if it was a work it was the best work of all time.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jun 27, 2020 14:31:02 GMT -5
Absolutely did.
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Jun 27, 2020 20:05:35 GMT -5
Yes. Bret screwed Bret
|
|
|
Post by MKSavage on Jun 27, 2020 20:18:27 GMT -5
Offering some more information, Bret has said over the years that what he wanted was for Shawn to show him some respect first, especially after what Shawn said about not promising to hurt him in the ring or putting him over anymore. Bret had said that if Shawn wanted Bret to put him over at Survivor Series, Bret wanted Shawn to put him over first on a raw prior to the PPV - but either Shawn or the company refused this request. Also, he has said for years that he offered to drop the title to anyone else prior to the PPV, I believe he said that he worked with Austin and Undertaker at house shows leading up to the PPV and would have dropped the title to either of them (they still would have had the match between Shawn and Bret at Survivor Series but it wouldn't have been a title match, just a grudge match). I don't blame Vince for doing what he did, I believe he did fear Bret taking the belt to WCW and using it on their TV (ironically like Vince had no problem doing with Flair and the WCW title earlier in the decade) which led to his actions. I don't think he had anything against Bret, I just think he didn't want WCW to use that against him and the WWF. But, I can also see Bret's side as well, would anyone be willing to do what he was asked with someone who had disrespected you for most of the year, and even caused problems in your marriage? Not to mention, Shawn was supposed to drop the belt to Bret at WM13 earlier in the year and refused to do it and just dropped the belt on RAW. I also find it kind of funny that a lot of Shawn Michaels fans have a problem with Bret not dropping the belt to him but seem to have no problem with all the times Shawn refused to drop a belt to another wrestler and just gave the belt up instead of getting pinned, I believe Jericho mentioned this on a podcast and said/asked has anyone in the wrestling business forfeited more titles instead of getting pinned/beat than Shawn Michaels.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 30, 2024 22:21:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2020 20:24:06 GMT -5
I will always side with Bret in the Montreal Screwjob so I say no.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick Bateman (original) on Jun 27, 2020 21:42:03 GMT -5
I still say it was a work. The entire year he was back he got 'screwed.' In Your House Dec. 96, HBK cost Bret the title against Sid, he got screwed. Royal Rumble 97, Austin cost him the win, he got screwed. The following night on Raw, he quits the WWF in an angle to go to WCW and then gets rehired. Loses the WWF Title to Sid the night after he won it at IYH due to Austin, he got screwed. Lost to Sid in the cage match due to Undertaker and Austin, he got screwed. Then in November the final screwing takes place and that's that. If Bret wanted to stay with the WWF so bad, then why didn't he?? He says in Wrestling With Shadows that it wasn't about the money. So then stay for less money?? I am guessing he would. People will argue this till the end of time, and if it's a work (like I believe it is) then it's the greatest work in the wrestling business ever! If it was a shoot?? Then it was the greatest wrestling shoot in the business ever! Either way, it wins, and people will always be guessing and wondering about it. Same. I think it was a work that turned into a shoot after Owen and his own injuries. I think if those things wouldn't of happened it would of come out as a work by now.
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Jun 28, 2020 10:50:01 GMT -5
if it was a work, why wouldn’t they have admitted it yet?
in bret’s book he vilifies McMahon for both the screwjob and his brother’s death. he’d really keep up the act, 15 years later? and Michaels would allow his career to forever be tarnished? and they’d have a DVD where it’s basically Bret just calling Michaels out on being a POS?
if it was a work, I think we would’ve found out with Owen’s passing. you don’t mix kayfabe with a person’s death.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 28, 2020 16:12:52 GMT -5
I still say it was a work. The entire year he was back he got 'screwed.' In Your House Dec. 96, HBK cost Bret the title against Sid, he got screwed. Royal Rumble 97, Austin cost him the win, he got screwed. The following night on Raw, he quits the WWF in an angle to go to WCW and then gets rehired. Loses the WWF Title to Sid the night after he won it at IYH due to Austin, he got screwed. Lost to Sid in the cage match due to Undertaker and Austin, he got screwed. Then in November the final screwing takes place and that's that. If Bret wanted to stay with the WWF so bad, then why didn't he?? He says in Wrestling With Shadows that it wasn't about the money. So then stay for less money?? I am guessing he would. People will argue this till the end of time, and if it's a work (like I believe it is) then it's the greatest work in the wrestling business ever! If it was a shoot?? Then it was the greatest wrestling shoot in the business ever! Either way, it wins, and people will always be guessing and wondering about it. They even had cameras rolling backstage the night of the screwjob. It made the whole thing look like a work.
|
|
jking1979
Superstar
Joined on: Oct 3, 2019 20:00:02 GMT -5
Posts: 754
|
Post by jking1979 on Jun 28, 2020 23:58:27 GMT -5
Vince McMahon, Shawn Michaels, Triple H and Earl Hebner screwed Bret Hart at Survivor Series 1997.
|
|
|
Post by Kill Em' All on Jun 29, 2020 0:52:48 GMT -5
I don’t blame him since his dislike for Shawn, but he killed that point for wanting to drop it the next night
I see it as he was looking out for himself since it was Shawn but I don’t blame Vince two very opposing agenda for each dude
|
|
TheXtremisT
Main Eventer
10 Year Member
This is the way
Joined on: May 3, 2008 8:03:15 GMT -5
Posts: 3,954
|
Post by TheXtremisT on Jun 29, 2020 4:30:49 GMT -5
I still say it was a work. The entire year he was back he got 'screwed.' In Your House Dec. 96, HBK cost Bret the title against Sid, he got screwed. Royal Rumble 97, Austin cost him the win, he got screwed. The following night on Raw, he quits the WWF in an angle to go to WCW and then gets rehired. Loses the WWF Title to Sid the night after he won it at IYH due to Austin, he got screwed. Lost to Sid in the cage match due to Undertaker and Austin, he got screwed. Then in November the final screwing takes place and that's that. If Bret wanted to stay with the WWF so bad, then why didn't he?? He says in Wrestling With Shadows that it wasn't about the money. So then stay for less money?? I am guessing he would. People will argue this till the end of time, and if it's a work (like I believe it is) then it's the greatest work in the wrestling business ever! If it was a shoot?? Then it was the greatest wrestling shoot in the business ever! Either way, it wins, and people will always be guessing and wondering about it. They even had cameras rolling backstage the night of the screwjob. It made the whole thing look like a work. Yeah but even the filmmakers admitted they stumbled upon gold and that prior to that it was just a documentary. They just happened to be right place, right time. There is no way it was a work, at least one person in the know would have blabbed by now. It is hard enough to get people to keep a secret in real life, let alone in wrestling. Plus Bret is not a good actor. He would not be this bitter if it was a work. Bret was a shell of his former self in WCW, moping around and never had any of the same passion he had before. Bischoff said he was a miserable person and didn't want to do anything. And that was prior to Owen's death and you could say it was due to backstage politics but Bret came in immediately like this. He could never move past the MSJ then and couldn't for years afterwards along with Owen's death.
|
|
|
Post by JokerFC on Jun 29, 2020 7:55:18 GMT -5
It wasn't a work.
I put more of the blame on Vince here to be honest.
Vince puts the belt on Bret @sslam 97 despite knowing that he is going to have serious upcoming issues with him & that Taker vs HBK is his main feud moving into Winter...I mean WTF is he thinking here? At this point he knows he is going to back out of the contract and tell Bret to go to WCW but he still makes him champ?
Vince's fears about the belt showing up on WCW are totally baseless. Turner executives would NEVER have allowed it and Bischoff wouldn't have done it. Turner was in sh*te up to their neck over the case with WWF concerning WWF property being on TV(womens belt) & Hall acting like Razor. Gerry McDevitt would have told Vince this...
Vince's claims that he hadn't got the money to reatin Brets services were also baseless. look at the $$$ he splashed on Tyson.
This is what happened....Vince was tired of Bret & high on his darling HBK. He seen more of a future in the soon to be DX (Correct decision) than Hart. he thought if he fed Bret a fable about being broke & told him to bounce to WCW with his permission to make the bug bucks for a few years then come home it would be all good. Of course in his heart he needed Bret to job to HBK on the way out....HBK was also likely in his ear about this amongst constant threats to take himself down south.
When Hart didn't go along willingly 100% with everything? We got trouble....by the time of IYH Ground Zero the trouble had started in earnest after One Night Only & he had his chance there to get the title off Bret. Bad Blood came and went still no change.....
IMO its all on Vince. Hart didnt want to drop to HBK & thats fine...Vince shouldnt have allowed it to go into that 30 days. arrogance....
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 30, 2024 22:21:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 29, 2020 11:26:34 GMT -5
if it wasnt a work, i put blame on both vince/bret equally!
despite creative control, EVERY other champ did the job before they left inc hogan/diesel etc! if wrestling is his life and cares SOOOO much about it, you honor the tradition.
on other hand, since bret/shawn had issues and bret was willing to drop belt to ANYONE else, vince shoulda just picked another guy for the night!
|
|