|
|
Post by LA Times on Dec 19, 2020 9:31:29 GMT -5
I've always been more interested in Sting Vs Kane than him and Taker. If Sting vs Undertaker was a dream match in 1997, then Wolfpac Sting vs Kane mustve been one in 1998. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Dec 19, 2020 10:17:01 GMT -5
The people complaining about Sting putting over older guys like HHH are the same people complaining he never faced The Undertaker. 😂 no one worded it like that. people didn't want him putting over triple h, quote one person who refers to not wanting sting to lose to 'older guys'. some of you reach so hard. |
|
|
|
Post by Hurricane on Dec 19, 2020 19:04:31 GMT -5
The people complaining about Sting putting over older guys like HHH are the same people complaining he never faced The Undertaker. 😂 no one worded it like that. people didn't want him putting over triple h, quote one person who refers to not wanting sting to lose to 'older guys'. some of you reach so hard. People have been saying exactly that for nearly 6 years, so I’m not sure what planet you’re living on. So many people complain that he was putting over Triple H, because he should have been facing Undertaker instead (an even older guy that he would have put over as well). Here’s a quote from earlier in this very thread: “They also brought him in to remind their fans that WWF defeated WCW. At least he put over young talent...like Triple H. The fact they never did Undertaker vs Sting is pure idiocy. No one can reasonably defend it.” Better luck next time. |
|
|
|
Post by K5 on Dec 19, 2020 21:19:59 GMT -5
no one worded it like that. people didn't want him putting over triple h, quote one person who refers to not wanting sting to lose to 'older guys'. some of you reach so hard. People have been saying exactly that for nearly 6 years, so I’m not sure what planet you’re living on. So many people complain that he was putting over Triple H, because he should have been facing Undertaker instead (an even older guy that he would have put over as well). Here’s a quote from earlier in this very thread: “They also brought him in to remind their fans that WWF defeated WCW. At least he put over young talent...like Triple H. The fact they never did Undertaker vs Sting is pure idiocy. No one can reasonably defend it.” Better luck next time. that quote makes my point...the problem wasn't putting someone older over, the problem was putting someone over that no one wanted to see and didn't need it. undertaker/sting would've been a dream match, I never heard anyone bicker about who would have to go over in that one. no one clamoured for sting/hhh and then they had hhh go over. |
|
