|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 16, 2007 13:10:49 GMT -5
New TNA Women's Champion Gail Kim was interviewed yesterday by "F4W" and had a lot to say about TNA's new women's division as well as Amazing Kong's "wardrobe malfunction" at Bound For Glory.
- Gail was asked when TNA decided to get serious about the Women's Division. She said, "when I started with the company, and they called me to offer me a contract, they said, “We want to build a women’s divison, but it’s not going to happen overnight”. And, I said, “Okay”. And, kind of a year had passed, a year and a half passed, and I said, “Guys, I want to wrestle"
- Gail was promised that when iMPACT! expanded to 2 hours, the Women's Division would get a big push. So far so good.
- Kim said she heard the wardrobe malfunction was not visible on TV, which it clearly was. She put over Amazing Kong as a great competitor and a real threat to her new TNA Women's title
- Gail talked about the differences between the WWE and TNA Women's Divisions. She said the WWE girls are "cookie cutter" while TNA has women of all shapes, sizes and nationalities.
Source: TNWrestlingNews.com
|
|
Spevo™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 6, 2004 5:01:06 GMT -5
Posts: 3,035
|
Post by Spevo™ on Oct 16, 2007 13:12:56 GMT -5
Hopefully Gail can keep the title for a while, she really deserves it.
|
|
|
|
Post by sincityhero on Oct 16, 2007 13:40:16 GMT -5
I agree with her about the divisions.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cammi Oh on Oct 16, 2007 14:35:06 GMT -5
Anyone have screen shots of KONG's malfunction? PM me with them and I will Exalt! Awesome!
|
|
|
|
Post by cosbydawg91 on Oct 16, 2007 18:06:11 GMT -5
you really wanna see that dude?
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Oct 16, 2007 18:36:00 GMT -5
Umm..how does that make any sense? WWE's division isn't cookie cutter..but I guess to her Melina, Candice, & Beth Phoenix( the last 3 champs) all look the same..
|
|
Mr. Bo Ziffer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 2, 2007 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 1,139
|
Post by Mr. Bo Ziffer on Oct 16, 2007 18:45:56 GMT -5
Umm..how does that make any sense? WWE's division isn't cookie cutter..but I guess to her Melina, Candice, & Beth Phoenix( the last 3 champs) all look the same.. She means there all skinny model types. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 16, 2007 19:02:07 GMT -5
Umm..how does that make any sense? WWE's division isn't cookie cutter..but I guess to her Melina, Candice, & Beth Phoenix( the last 3 champs) all look the same.. They all look like models is what she means. |
|
|
|
Post by ztj_wwf on Oct 16, 2007 19:16:48 GMT -5
All the other girls in the TNA division don't look like 'cookie cutters'. They have girls of all different sizes and nationalities? No they don't, except for Viscera with a vagina.
ODB
Shelly
Angel
Talia
Ms. Brooks
They are no different from any WWE divas.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Oct 16, 2007 19:37:11 GMT -5
All the other girls in the TNA division don't look like 'cookie cutters'. They have girls of all different sizes and nationalities? No they don't, except for Viscera with a vagina. ODB Shelly Angel Talia Ms. Brooks They are no different from any WWE divas. The difference is that they're wrestlers BEFORE they're signed... |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 16, 2007 19:56:18 GMT -5
All the other girls in the TNA division don't look like 'cookie cutters'. They have girls of all different sizes and nationalities? No they don't, except for Viscera with a vagina. ODB Shelly Angel Talia Ms. Brooks They are no different from any WWE divas. You don't get it.. all of those you just named was wrestlers before they signed with TNA. They didn't come in because they was "hot" or because they use to be models. The only women in TNA that wasn't wrestlers before TNA signed them are Leticia & Crystal who aren't wresters but interviewers.. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 16:53:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2007 20:49:15 GMT -5
Anyone have screen shots of KONG's malfunction? PM me with them and I will Exalt! Awesome!  (Don't Ban Me Plz) |
|
|
|
Post by James St. James on Oct 17, 2007 10:57:52 GMT -5
I would like to take objection to Gails comments. While I agree the WWE womens division isn't as good as it has been, and their is a lot of fat that needs to be trimmed, TNAs isn't much better than the WWEs.
Amazing Kong = Beth Phoenix
Gail Kim = Mickie James
Roxxi LeVeaux (she sucks!) = Torrie Wilson
Jacqueline = Jillian
Talia = Melina
ODB = Victoria
Christy = Maria
Ms. Brooks = Candice
Shelly = skank who will do anything for attention/money with supposed wrestling abilities I have yet to see. Lent absolutely nothing to the WWE womans division while she was there.
I forgot the tenth knockout, but do you really need 10 in the chase anyways? I think its moreso the fact that the divas are on 2 different shows and the booking is terrible on both of them. If all the divas were on the same show it would be a lot better.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2007 11:33:14 GMT -5
Did you SERIOUSLY just compare Traci Brooks to Candice?
|
|
|
|
Post by James St. James on Oct 17, 2007 13:31:29 GMT -5
Yes. From what I've seen of Traci, she is on par with Candice. Until she starts showing me some more in the ring I'm sticking to it.
Gail Kim needs to just shut it and realize she is on the show with a 1.0 rating, and have respect for her fellow female wrestlers, even if they aren't fat, black or asian.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2007 13:56:18 GMT -5
Yes. From what I've seen of Traci, she is on par with Candice. Until she starts showing me some more in the ring I'm sticking to it. Gail Kim needs to just shut it and realize she is on the show with a 1.0 rating, and have respect for her fellow female wrestlers, even if they aren't fat, black or asian. Then you haven't see much then.. Also, how is she dis-respecting them? She just said that the womens division in WWE is "cookie-cutter" compared to TNA? Also, what does a 1.0 have anything to do with what she said? |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Oct 17, 2007 14:35:54 GMT -5
She shouldnt respect Women who have no buisness being in the Ring. Especially these generic bimbos who are only employed because of looks...
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2007 15:21:38 GMT -5
She shouldnt respect Women who have no buisness being in the Ring. Especially these generic bimbos who are only employed because of looks... And people wonder why we <3 Asia.. |
|
Master Lewpac
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Detroit plays dirty.
Joined on: Apr 12, 2007 1:47:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,890
|
Post by Master Lewpac on Oct 17, 2007 15:32:20 GMT -5
Anyone have screen shots of KONG's malfunction? PM me with them and I will Exalt! Awesome! Just tune into ECW every tuesday, I believe she goes under the name Big Daddy V. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 24, 2024 16:53:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2007 16:06:18 GMT -5
Did you SERIOUSLY just compare Traci Brooks to Candice? Moreover, did he seriously just compare Beth to Kong? Beth is good in the ring, but Amazing Kong she ain't. This guy sounds like the type to drool at the screen whenever Candice Michelle or Maria learn a new move. He probably didn't even watch TNA until they created the women's division. |
|
