|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 8, 2008 21:27:38 GMT -5
Do they really need to spend 20 minutes on the entrances?
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 8, 2008 21:29:37 GMT -5
Do they really need to spend 20 minutes on the entrances? Yes. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:30:03 GMT -5
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 1, 2024 22:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 21:31:05 GMT -5
Well, there is 6 people entering for this match. It's gonna take a bit, nothing new to wrestling fans.
C'mon now, James (you too deskjet)... you both know how wrestling works with main event entrances. Haha.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:31:09 GMT -5
Alright, we get it! we seen the challengers come to the ring...we dont need to hear it again
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:32:00 GMT -5
Well, there is 6 people entering for this match. It's gonna take a bit, nothing new to wrestling fans. C'mon now, James (you too deskjet)... you both know how wrestling works with main event entrances. Haha. - Triple S I know man, I'm just tired...LOL |
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 8, 2008 21:33:13 GMT -5
Well, there is 6 people entering for this match. It's gonna take a bit, nothing new to wrestling fans. C'mon now, James (you too deskjet)... you both know how wrestling works with main event entrances. Haha. - Triple S I sure as craphope you're not serious. They really spent about 10-15 mins on just the entrances when they could have done in in about 5. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:37:07 GMT -5
uhmmm...the concept of this match is so dumb
|
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Jun 8, 2008 21:39:39 GMT -5
Booker T pinned Rhino with a Bookend
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 1, 2024 22:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 21:40:55 GMT -5
Whats dumb about it? Not saying that it isn't, just curious as to WHY you think it is.
I just hate the reverse ladder match part. If it was a 5-Man ladder match, with the penalty box, I think it'd be better.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 8, 2008 21:42:54 GMT -5
That's my only issue with some of TNA's "innovative" matches. Having a reverse battle royals and reverse ladder matches is just silly.
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 8, 2008 21:43:41 GMT -5
Exactly why the concept is dumb. TNA and their shitty "Concepts" for gimmick matches. They have a reverse battle royal too. And I thought this reverse ladder match was bad...
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:44:04 GMT -5
hurry up and win this booker so i can go home and watch the Celtics beat LA
|
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Jun 8, 2008 21:44:39 GMT -5
Roode pins Cage via chairshot, knocking the ladder cage was holding into his own face
|
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Jun 8, 2008 21:44:56 GMT -5
Rhino pins Roode via roll up
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Dec 1, 2024 22:43:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 8, 2008 21:45:14 GMT -5
So, are we all agreeing that if TNA turned King of the Mountain into a 5-Man Ladder Match... where the title was hung above the ring, instead of being hung up, and they kept the penalty/eligibleness (yeah, I think I made that up)... it'd be much better?
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Jun 8, 2008 21:46:42 GMT -5
Whats dumb about it? Not saying that it isn't, just curious as to WHY you think it is. I just hate the reverse ladder match part. If it was a 5-Man ladder match, with the penalty box, I think it'd be better. - Triple S well, its complicated for the casual fan or even the tna fan to understand what the rules are..I just think that while i'm watching a wrestling show it should require me to analyze the concept of a gimmcik match. It's an interesting concept just a bit confusing |
|
|
|
Post by Wato Stan Account on Jun 8, 2008 21:46:47 GMT -5
Yes, also having the KOTM on free tv(although not the same competitors) days before the PPV that has it as it's signature match, not smart.
|
|
|
|
Post by kurtangleisgod on Jun 8, 2008 21:46:47 GMT -5
Christian cage pins Booker T via frog splash
|
|
|
|
Post by James Hetfield on Jun 8, 2008 21:46:49 GMT -5
TNA completely stopping anything gimmick-y would make it better. That womens match was a Hair vs. Hair, Battle Royal and a Ladder match all in one. You can't tell me that's good.
|
|
