|
Post by RAC on Jul 21, 2008 18:51:25 GMT -5
Just got back from seeing it a 3rd time and it's not even over for me. I could see it 100 times and not get bored.
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Jul 21, 2008 19:04:39 GMT -5
Some fat kid said that TDK was a prequel to the '89 Batman. Don't know if he is being stupid or telling the truth really, since I never bothered to see any of the Batman movies besides Batman Returns, Batman Begins and TDK.
|
|
|
Post by Kody on Jul 21, 2008 19:10:54 GMT -5
Some fat kid said that TDK was a prequel to the '89 Batman. Don't know if he is being stupid or telling the truth really, since I never bothered to see any of the Batman movies besides Batman Returns, Batman Begins and TDK. lol no
|
|
hartbreakkid!
Superstar
Joined on: Sept 22, 2007 12:28:22 GMT -5
Posts: 900
|
Post by hartbreakkid! on Jul 21, 2008 19:17:26 GMT -5
Hey guys just saw it, and it was by FAR the best movie Ive ever seen. The only part that scared me (mildly) was when the dead "Joker" hit the window. Other than that, It was AMAZING. Heath Ledger was INCREDIBLE. Heath Ledger WILL win an Oscar for being the Joker. Quote me. "You wanna know how I got these scars?"
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Jul 21, 2008 19:24:44 GMT -5
YES I'm goin again tomorrow. The movie is at about 4, but I'm going at 12 to get the tickets because its right near my workplace and I'm gunning for the IMAX with my friend.
|
|
|
Post by Trypod on Jul 21, 2008 19:44:25 GMT -5
I'll have to check it out in IMAX soon. I've only been gone once. Trying to figure out when I'm want to see it next. I totally intend on seeing it a couple of more times.
Listening to the soundtrack now. Good stuff. Love Joker's theme.
|
|
|
Post by Deadshot on Jul 21, 2008 19:46:13 GMT -5
If they ever use the Joker again I think Johnny Depp would be their best option. DIE. Please.
|
|
|
Post by sasso on Jul 21, 2008 19:48:20 GMT -5
Yeah, looks like the next time I'll be seeing this is when it's released on DVD. Anyway, anyone watch Jame Rolfe's reviews on BB and TDK? I love his AVGN videos, but his comments on the films were very weak and he more or less says that Batman movies shouldn't be taken seriously and shouldn't attempt to be serious films. Truth be told, judging from the reviews he didn't even seem to understand the themes in either movie.
|
|
MuffFuzz
Main Eventer
Where is he?!
Joined on: Feb 21, 2004 14:56:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,995
|
Post by MuffFuzz on Jul 21, 2008 19:52:14 GMT -5
Yeah, the dead Batman imposter hitting the window with the noose around his neck; that startled me for a sec. lol, my mom was like "thats joker playing dead again" then I say "No, that's one of the fake batmen!"
|
|
MuffFuzz
Main Eventer
Where is he?!
Joined on: Feb 21, 2004 14:56:16 GMT -5
Posts: 2,995
|
Post by MuffFuzz on Jul 21, 2008 19:57:54 GMT -5
Hey, wasn't their a rumour about a scene where we get to see what Joker looks like from the point of view of someone who is poisoned with Crane's fear gas?
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Jul 21, 2008 20:05:41 GMT -5
I just saw the movie again.
A few things:
1. Anyone who says Dent isn't dead...is a moron. No more claims about "the coin landed clean head side up". That coin flip was for the kid anyway, not Dent. Nice try.
2. The end of this movie really sets up perfectly for a Riddler appearance in the next movie...if they do one. I'm calling Catwoman and the Riddler as the two main villains.
3. Ledger's performance stands up well to a second viewing. Even if the first one was only a few days prior. I still laughed. A lot. I'm thinking there will be a deleted scene with Harleen Quinzell and the Joker on the dvd.
4. A second showing makes me appreciate Eckhardt's performance that much more.
5. Bale sounds really nasally under that cowl. Brother needs to blow his nose.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:30:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2008 20:07:22 GMT -5
Hey, wasn't their a rumour about a scene where we get to see what Joker looks like from the point of view of someone who is poisoned with Crane's fear gas? That sounds awesome. I hope there are some nice deleted scenes on the DVD. Another question that has been asked is what happened to the Joker up at Harvey's party?
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jul 21, 2008 20:13:32 GMT -5
I just saw the movie again. A few things: 1. Anyone who says Dent isn't dead...is a moron. No more claims about "the coin landed clean head side up". That coin flip was for the kid anyway, not Dent. Nice try. 2. The end of this movie really sets up perfectly for a Riddler appearance in the next movie...if they do one. I'm calling Catwoman and the Riddler as the two main villains. 3. Ledger's performance stands up well to a second viewing. Even if the first one was only a few days prior. I still laughed. A lot. I'm thinking there will be a deleted scene with Harleen Quinzell and the Joker on the dvd. 4. A second showing makes me appreciate Eckhardt's performance that much more. 5. Bale sounds really nasally under that cowl. Brother needs to blow his nose. What makes you think Harley will have a deleted scene?
|
|
|
Post by jayjayjames on Jul 21, 2008 20:15:49 GMT -5
Hey, wasn't their a rumour about a scene where we get to see what Joker looks like from the point of view of someone who is poisoned with Crane's fear gas? That sounds awesome. I hope there are some nice deleted scenes on the DVD. Another question that has been asked is what happened to the Joker up at Harvey's party? Although there's no scene he more than likely left as he could not find Dent.
|
|
|
Post by modano09 on Jul 21, 2008 20:21:28 GMT -5
Hey, wasn't their a rumour about a scene where we get to see what Joker looks like from the point of view of someone who is poisoned with Crane's fear gas? That sounds awesome. I hope there are some nice deleted scenes on the DVD. Another question that has been asked is what happened to the Joker up at Harvey's party? I think he just left. Got there, didn't find Dent, threw Rachel off the building and got out of there before Batman could come back and kick his ass again. Dent wasn't anywhere to be seen and throwing Rachel off the building seem to be a distraction to get Batman off him, since Batman took care of his men and Joker isn't really tough.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Jul 21, 2008 20:30:41 GMT -5
I just saw the movie again. A few things: 1. Anyone who says Dent isn't dead...is a moron. No more claims about "the coin landed clean head side up". That coin flip was for the kid anyway, not Dent. Nice try. 2. The end of this movie really sets up perfectly for a Riddler appearance in the next movie...if they do one. I'm calling Catwoman and the Riddler as the two main villains. 3. Ledger's performance stands up well to a second viewing. Even if the first one was only a few days prior. I still laughed. A lot. I'm thinking there will be a deleted scene with Harleen Quinzell and the Joker on the dvd. 4. A second showing makes me appreciate Eckhardt's performance that much more. 5. Bale sounds really nasally under that cowl. Brother needs to blow his nose. What makes you think Harley will have a deleted scene? And how does that ending set up anything? Just a hunch about Harley. _____________________________________________________ Assuming of course that they follow the plot for The Dark Knight...it's pretty obvious that a lot of people are going to STILL be trying to figure out who the Batman is. Enter an obsessed detective Eddie Nashton. As we've seen in Nolan's universe, he doesn't have a problem mixing elements of the comics to create stronger villains. Nashton, a superb detective who has had extraordinary problem solving skills since childhood, becomes obsessed with solving the mystery of who the Batman is. So much so that it throws him over the edge, creating his own Riddles to help slowly piece together the mystery of the Batman. I think if a third movie comes out the most logical thing to do is to continue to have Batman be an outlaw, have Eddie Nashton be the straight detective, and towards the end of the movie have the bad guy/good guy dynamic flip in the eyes of Gotham. Batman shows Gotham the true nature of the Riddler and as such becomes not only the Hero they deserve but also the hero that Gotham wants.
|
|
|
Post by chumped on Jul 21, 2008 20:32:01 GMT -5
What makes you think Harley will have a deleted scene? And how does that ending set up anything? Just a hunch about Harley. _____________________________________________________ Assuming of course that they follow the plot for The Dark Knight...it's pretty obvious that a lot of people are going to STILL be trying to figure out who the Batman is. Enter an obsessed detective Eddie Nashton. As we've seen in Nolan's universe, he doesn't have a problem mixing elements of the comics to create stronger villains. Nashton, a superb detective who has had extraordinary problem solving skills since childhood, becomes obsessed with solving the mystery of who the Batman is. So much so that it throws him over the edge, creating his own Riddles to help slowly piece together the mystery of the Batman. I think if a third movie comes out the most logical thing to do is to continue to have Batman be an outlaw, have Eddie Nashton be the straight detective, and towards the end of the movie have the bad guy/good guy dynamic flip in the eyes of Gotham. Batman shows Gotham the true nature of the Riddler and as such becomes not only the Hero they deserve but also the hero that Gotham wants. Ah, I see. I thought you meant like, THE ending, with Dent/Batman/Gordon, then Batman riding away. Everyone seems to think that Mr. Reese is Riddler
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Jul 21, 2008 20:35:04 GMT -5
Just a hunch about Harley. _____________________________________________________ Assuming of course that they follow the plot for The Dark Knight...it's pretty obvious that a lot of people are going to STILL be trying to figure out who the Batman is. Enter an obsessed detective Eddie Nashton. As we've seen in Nolan's universe, he doesn't have a problem mixing elements of the comics to create stronger villains. Nashton, a superb detective who has had extraordinary problem solving skills since childhood, becomes obsessed with solving the mystery of who the Batman is. So much so that it throws him over the edge, creating his own Riddles to help slowly piece together the mystery of the Batman. I think if a third movie comes out the most logical thing to do is to continue to have Batman be an outlaw, have Eddie Nashton be the straight detective, and towards the end of the movie have the bad guy/good guy dynamic flip in the eyes of Gotham. Batman shows Gotham the true nature of the Riddler and as such becomes not only the Hero they deserve but also the hero that Gotham wants. Ah, I see. I thought you meant like, THE ending, with Dent/Batman/Gordon, then Batman riding away. Everyone seems to think that Mr. Reese is Riddler Nada. Unfortunately there was no scene with Jim Gordon and Batman on the roof and Gordon stamping a green question mark to batman's head to help us out this time. If only the Riddler had a card....*sigh* hahaha.
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Jul 21, 2008 20:36:41 GMT -5
Just a hunch about Harley. _____________________________________________________ Assuming of course that they follow the plot for The Dark Knight...it's pretty obvious that a lot of people are going to STILL be trying to figure out who the Batman is. Enter an obsessed detective Eddie Nashton. As we've seen in Nolan's universe, he doesn't have a problem mixing elements of the comics to create stronger villains. Nashton, a superb detective who has had extraordinary problem solving skills since childhood, becomes obsessed with solving the mystery of who the Batman is. So much so that it throws him over the edge, creating his own Riddles to help slowly piece together the mystery of the Batman. I think if a third movie comes out the most logical thing to do is to continue to have Batman be an outlaw, have Eddie Nashton be the straight detective, and towards the end of the movie have the bad guy/good guy dynamic flip in the eyes of Gotham. Batman shows Gotham the true nature of the Riddler and as such becomes not only the Hero they deserve but also the hero that Gotham wants. Ah, I see. I thought you meant like, THE ending, with Dent/Batman/Gordon, then Batman riding away. Everyone seems to think that Mr. Reese is Riddler My feeling about this is that if that was the case they would have cast a bigger name for that role considering they are going to have to anchor the next movie. Even Cillian Murphy was a big enough name for a Batman villain. They could have cast someone big for that role (of Reese).
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Jul 21, 2008 20:37:52 GMT -5
Saw it a 4th time. Still amazed as I was the first time.
|
|