Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:59:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 22:09:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by CampCornette on Feb 15, 2017 22:14:46 GMT -5
1. Not Mattel
2. They look awful
3. They all look awful, no clue why anyone would drop $100 for 2 of these dumpster fires
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:59:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 22:17:53 GMT -5
Yeah, all the wwe figuarts look awkward as hell.
Just bad.
Also, whats the obsession people have over double sleeved kane?
Didnt he only do it a few times over a couple months?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 28, 2024 16:59:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 15, 2017 22:19:43 GMT -5
Yeah, all the wwe figuarts look awkward as hell. Just bad. Also, whats the obsession people have over double sleeved kane? Didnt he only do it a few times over a couple months? Personally, I like the look of double sleeved Kane. Just looks more menacing. |
|
Clique
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Mar 14, 2015 0:33:50 GMT -5
Posts: 67
|
Post by Clique on Feb 15, 2017 22:19:52 GMT -5
Not a fan of the Taker, but that Kane is A1.
|
|
|
|
Post by BadGirlRyleigh on Feb 15, 2017 22:23:31 GMT -5
Was expecting 1998 Taker & Kane. I don't understand why they made RA versions when they just made Rock Austin & Triple H and Vince is in development
|
|
|
|
Post by The American Daydream on Feb 15, 2017 22:31:19 GMT -5
The only thing they have going for them thats better than mattel is the amount of different posing theyre capable of. Everything else about them is crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Feb 15, 2017 22:40:02 GMT -5
Kane turned out pretty good. Taker's singlet is way off.
|
|
gregrules420
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 29, 2014 9:17:09 GMT -5
Posts: 4,884 
|
Post by gregrules420 on Feb 15, 2017 22:49:45 GMT -5
1. Not Mattel 2. They look awful 3. They all look awful, no clue why anyone would drop $100 for 2 of these dumpster fires thank you rock and SCSA were awful as well |
|
|
|
Post by Sizzle on Feb 15, 2017 22:53:02 GMT -5
That Kane is their best figure so far. I won't buy it because I can't justify 56 bucks for an action figure...
But that Taker is Shiite.
|
|
nwo4lyfe
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 6, 2017 22:56:36 GMT -5
Posts: 124
|
Post by nwo4lyfe on Feb 15, 2017 22:55:01 GMT -5
Absolutely horrible why couldn't we get debut or attitude era outfits for both🤔
|
|
Biff Slamkovich™
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 21, 2009 22:53:58 GMT -5
Posts: 3,594
Member is Online
|
Post by Biff Slamkovich™ on Feb 15, 2017 23:17:52 GMT -5
If you're into displaying only, Figuarts definitely has amazing articulation. But as people have said, in terms of the look of these figures they're a little off.
|
|
vashts
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 2, 2014 10:03:58 GMT -5
Posts: 523
|
Post by vashts on Feb 15, 2017 23:18:15 GMT -5
I wish Mattel would use the dot matrix face technology. But these are a pass. Everyone WANTS Debut Taker and kane before these two abominations. Who the heck at Bandai thought this was a good idea?
|
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Feb 15, 2017 23:25:48 GMT -5
They look a little weird but so did the rock and stone cold. I will wait to see finished product before i fully judge them. I don't think i would buy them though. Too expensive.
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Feb 15, 2017 23:30:01 GMT -5
Not liking either of them, at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by qdogg on Feb 15, 2017 23:33:17 GMT -5
would of preferred debuts of them as well
|
|
|
|
Post by TheHitmanKid on Feb 15, 2017 23:49:21 GMT -5
(Mattel executive laughing)
Undertaker figure looks like they used a JAKKS head.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mongo Bears on Feb 15, 2017 23:53:09 GMT -5
Me no like
|
|
|
|
Post by Vamp55 on Feb 15, 2017 23:55:38 GMT -5
The McMahon one is the only good one so far.
If they make Hitman, Warrior or Balor I may get it, but so far easy pass for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Old School Collector on Feb 16, 2017 0:00:42 GMT -5
Awful
|
|
