Orton comments on Kennedy vid

You do realize no one is "trying" to change your opinion, right? As in, whenever you post things like "and my opinion hasn't changed" to a comment like that, it makes no sense since he wasn't trying to sway you on something. If anything, he was just sharing his opinion, much like you label a majority of your posts as.

We are all very happy that you enjoy Ken Anderson over Randy Orton, and while a great deal of us disagree to an extent, the majority of us are not trying to "debate" Orton vs Anderson. If anything, we are just simply debating the intention of your posts vs what is actually typed.

I think Randy Orton is great.

Ken Anderson is the best wrestler in the world.

See the difference between those two? One is obviously an opinion, stated as so with the phrase "I think". It could also be substituted with "I believe" or "In my opinion". The second one, the way it is phrased, does not really imply an "opinion". Mainly because it appears to be stated as a fact.

Now I get it. "It's a fact to me". Roger that, over and out. However, when your phrase things as a fact, regardless of if it's a fact to you or not, others get the impression you are in fact stating it as undeniable truth. That is the reason that people are so "defensive" to most of your posts. You make a claim, attempt to back it up as a fact with "proving points", and then hide behind "It's an opinion" whenever someone brings up a point you can't counter-point.

Am I the general of these forums? No. Am I the standard in post, with rules and regulations of how to post? Not even close. But if we are going to give our "opiinons" about something, and since the topic of this thread as shifted a great deal, I suppose this is my "opinion" of you. Now, I'm sure you don't care....or disagree....or will respond with a counter of sorts. Thats all good, since that's your right as a poster.

But I'll finish with this. While I don't agree completely with you about Mr. Anderson, I think he has been better in TNA then he has in WWE. The Angle/Anderson feud is honestly the only part of TNA I've actually tried to make sure I catch. Ken gets to do his thing on the mic, and show his personality. It's entertaining and I'd be a liar if I said otherwise.

But according to all the "sources" we have about the situation, including both Ken and Orton's account of things, have pointed out that Orton WAS NOT the only one that got him fired. And since none of us are actually wrestlers who get in the ring with either man, who are we to declair when someone is "injured or not". Given how much we know about his past, which is a great deal now days, Orton has never "faked an injury". Not to metion, as much as Ken might know about injuries, he's never broken his collar bone. In fact, I'd like to see if any members here actually have. You know who's opinion of the matter should be held above all? Randy Orton. Why? Because hes the guy with the former broken Collar Bone. He's the one claiming he had pain. And he's the only that landed awkwardly, regardless who's fault it is.

So anything else about Orton "abusing his power" or "trying to get Ken fired because of jealousy" or any of that other crapis exactly that. Nothing but bullshit.

This is still going on?

Well, I just read Sean's post and that pretty much sums up the whole thing.

If that post don't stop this, then nothing will.