Jeff Hardy to plead GUILTY

Obviously murder is not ok, because you are harming someone else. That law is completely justifiable.

We should not just accept things the way they are and sit down and let these things take over our lives. We do need to stand up and fight. We cannot let unjust laws go on.

Damn people are so clouded in the own ing bias, they refuse to even LOOK AT it from someone else's POV.

This has NOTHING to do with the government.

See how it is though. You do post something trying to open people's eyes and you are labeled as crazy and anything you say will be brought back to try and discredit you later on. Ridiculous.

People can make up their own mind. If they want to buy drugs and take them, so what? They harm no one by taking the drugs. We don't punish gas stations for selling cigarettes or alcohol.

How can you convict someone on a charge you can't prove? That is how it is bogus.

Just because you have guns doesn't mean you are going to go shoot up some places. So why is it that they think that if he has drugs that he will sell them?

Has all the evidence been disclosed in this case? Considering it's been delayed so many times, there hasn't even been a chance for anyone to provide their evidence or witnesses. All the facts are really only known by the defense and the prosecution.

And, if Jeff is, in fact, going to plead guilty, chances are there is probably a witness or some evidence that will show that he did, in fact, have intent to sell at least some of the drugs.

Chances are, he'll strike some sort of deal, and the evidence will wind up sealed. He'll get his punishment, and the rest of us will know that he did something wrong.

But, since we won't actually have knowledge of what the evidence is, the CM's and Slappy's of the world will continue to claim it was unjust, it was dumb, there was no reason for it, etc. Even though the prosecution may have had an eye witness that says "I saw Jeff dealing drugs before, and I know he had plans to sell some of the drugs he was busted with", it will still be unjust.

I still love the fact that you're ignoring the fact that Jeff may have had intent to distribute. You think they're going to just drop it for a guilty plea. But you still don't get that he may have had intent to traffick.

There is no proof THAT WE KNOW OF. Just because they haven't released it yet DOES NOT mean that the proof doesn't exist. Once again, let me go through it again.

The trial has been delayed numerous times. The evidence has not been brought forward, because they have not had a chance to present it, because THE TRIAL HAS BEEN DELAYED.

With me so far? Probably not, but I'll continue.

The only people who know the evidence or witnesses are the defense team, and the prosecution. And they only know it because it is required that they share the information with each other.

Get it? Understand? Just because the evidence has not been released (and will most likely end up sealed when Jeff pleads guilty) does NOT mean it does not exist. Period. End of story. The police are not going to charge someone with a crime unless they have evidence that there is a reason to (see, k5? I've been reading your posts).

EDIT: Jeff was also charged with misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. Which, get this, can mean dealer supplies.

"Dealer-specific products are used by the drug sellers or traffickers for preparing drugs for distribution. Items such as digital scales, vials, and small "ziploc" baggies that can be used to sell crack, heroin, or marijuana fall into this category."

Yeah, because no one has ever been arrested before on literally bogus charges. Meaning they were charged with something that has nothing to do with the reason they were arrested.

People who sit in their car and refuse to get out for the police and get dragged out of their car and arrested can get a bogus charge of assaulting a police officer tacked on even if they didn't even lay a finger on the cops.

So if he had sandwich bags in his house, he could be charged with intent, because he may break up the drugs into those bags. How stupid.

OK. You aren't even paying attention. Otherwise, you'd see that more than one person has provided more than enough evidence to support the possibility he was intending to sell. But, hey, whatever. Stay in your ignorance.