|
Post by K5 on Jan 28, 2014 12:19:05 GMT -5
No matter the intention, this is what's happened: --------------------------------- WWE = Overprotective parent Crowd = Virgin teenage daughter Daniel Bryan = Bad boy on a motorcycle --------------------------------- The more they try to keep them apart, the more they are drawn to each other. Batista = the HS star QB with the scholarship to that amazing University that the parents think is better for her ...but is actually just a roided out ugly douchebag with the intelligence of a flea
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:20:14 GMT -5
Unless this is all part of some huge storyline....I'd just fire Daniel Bryan. His mere presence in the company is a huge distraction. Daniel Bryan has ruined more segments that HE WASN'T EVEN IN than the WHAT chant. He's WORSE than WHAT! It's embarrassing that the hardcore mark fans are RUINING other wrestlers moments, like Batista winning the Rumble and Orton winning the Championship by chanting YES/NO and DANIEL BRYAN when Daniel Bryan isn't even IN THE SEGMENT, and those fans are also ruining WWE for those of us who are not OBSESSED with Daniel Bryan. Yeah, I like Daniel Bryan, too. I think he's a great wrestler and I enjoy his matches....but I don't go into work everyday and yell NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO! at my boss because nothing on the morning meeting agenda has anything to do with Daniel Bryan. Be a Daniel Bryan fan and when Daniel Bryan is involved in the segment, cheer for him or boo at him as much as you want...but when Daniel Bryan's segment is over, just drop it and focus on who IS in the segment. I mean, do you guys want Daniel Bryan to be on RAW for the entire 3 hours tonight? Will there be OUTRAGE if 15 minutes goes by and Daniel Bryan is not seen, heard from, or mentioned? This whole thing is really crazy. I couldn't agree more. If Daniel Bryan is going to ruin the rest of the product, I'd rather he leave. Unless this is all part of some huge storyline....I'd just fire Daniel Bryan. His mere presence in the company is a huge distraction. Daniel Bryan has ruined more segments that HE WASN'T EVEN IN than the WHAT chant. He's WORSE than WHAT! It's embarrassing that the hardcore mark fans are RUINING other wrestlers moments, like Batista winning the Rumble and Orton winning the Championship by chanting YES/NO and DANIEL BRYAN when Daniel Bryan isn't even IN THE SEGMENT, and those fans are also ruining WWE for those of us who are not OBSESSED with Daniel Bryan. Yeah, I like Daniel Bryan, too. I think he's a great wrestler and I enjoy his matches....but I don't go into work everyday and yell NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO! at my boss because nothing on the morning meeting agenda has anything to do with Daniel Bryan. Be a Daniel Bryan fan and when Daniel Bryan is involved in the segment, cheer for him or boo at him as much as you want...but when Daniel Bryan's segment is over, just drop it and focus on who IS in the segment. I mean, do you guys want Daniel Bryan to be on RAW for the entire 3 hours tonight? Will there be OUTRAGE if 15 minutes goes by and Daniel Bryan is not seen, heard from, or mentioned? This whole thing is really crazy. Dude you hate on the Yankees offseason moves and now Daniel Bryan, Are you serious bro? Jk. I don't think they're "ruining" anyone's moment, no one cares about Batista and that was obvious by the lack of a pop he got at the rumble and when he returned Funny because 2 million extra people tuned in to see Batista return, and he got a great pop at the rumble. It wasn't until the butthurt marks realized that Bryan wasn't in that he started getting booed.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:28:57 GMT -5
I don't get all the hype. He lost the opening match and just cuz everyone yells yes/no he still gets pushed. If the loser gets the push why don't they give truth or ANY mid card wrestler a chance? When truth comes out all the fans scream what's up.the only difference is truth has payed his dues.bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging
|
|
SMK
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2007 20:02:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,354
|
Post by SMK on Jan 28, 2014 12:30:08 GMT -5
I'm not sure how anyone could feel bad for Batista. He looks horribly rusty and has regressed on the mic. But he gets to come back and immediately main event WM. I dont blame the crowd a bit for booing him relentlessly. He shouldn't be the one in that spot.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 28, 2014 12:30:47 GMT -5
I don't get all the hype. He lost the opening match and just cuz everyone yells yes/no he still gets pushed. If the loser gets the push why don't they give truth or ANY mid card wrestler a chance? When truth comes out all the fans scream what's up.the only difference is truth has payed his dues.bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging This might be the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on this site. Congratulations.
|
|
SMK
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 24, 2007 20:02:00 GMT -5
Posts: 1,354
|
Post by SMK on Jan 28, 2014 12:31:18 GMT -5
I don't get all the hype. He lost the opening match and just cuz everyone yells yes/no he still gets pushed. If the loser gets the push why don't they give truth or ANY mid card wrestler a chance? When truth comes out all the fans scream what's up.the only difference is truth has payed his dues.bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging You are trying too hard to troll.
|
|
|
Post by el torro on Jan 28, 2014 12:32:29 GMT -5
bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging I...
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jan 28, 2014 12:33:07 GMT -5
WWE is trolling the IWC...so hard! I love it more and more. 'The IWC.' Yup, because those weren't actual people at the Rumble, it was only people online who had an emotional reaction. the whole 'IWC' concept. It's so dead and gone that it's not even funny. What does it even mean these days? When WWE spends a majority of their show promoting an app and other means of social media, which a very large portion of its audience is a part of, then where does that line even exist anymore?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:33:15 GMT -5
I don't get all the hype. He lost the opening match and just cuz everyone yells yes/no he still gets pushed. If the loser gets the push why don't they give truth or ANY mid card wrestler a chance? When truth comes out all the fans scream what's up.the only difference is truth has payed his dues.bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging You are trying too hard to troll. you are a troll
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:36:18 GMT -5
Batista = the HS star QB with the scholarship to that amazing University that the parents think is better for her ...but is actually just a roided out ugly douchebag with the intelligence of a flea lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:39:25 GMT -5
I don't get all the hype. He lost the opening match and just cuz everyone yells yes/no he still gets pushed. If the loser gets the push why don't they give truth or ANY mid card wrestler a chance? When truth comes out all the fans scream what's up.the only difference is truth has payed his dues.bryan only gets pushed cuz who he is banging This might be the most ridiculous thing I've ever read on this site. Congratulations. this is only ridiculous cuz you say so??? Is this how I will become a hall of famer?
|
|
Fleet Foxes
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 9, 2012 10:27:47 GMT -5
Posts: 1,117
|
Post by Fleet Foxes on Jan 28, 2014 12:46:05 GMT -5
Unless this is all part of some huge storyline....I'd just fire Daniel Bryan. His mere presence in the company is a huge distraction. Daniel Bryan has ruined more segments that HE WASN'T EVEN IN than the WHAT chant. He's WORSE than WHAT! It's embarrassing that the hardcore mark fans are RUINING other wrestlers moments, like Batista winning the Rumble and Orton winning the Championship by chanting YES/NO and DANIEL BRYAN when Daniel Bryan isn't even IN THE SEGMENT, and those fans are also ruining WWE for those of us who are not OBSESSED with Daniel Bryan. Yeah, I like Daniel Bryan, too. I think he's a great wrestler and I enjoy his matches....but I don't go into work everyday and yell NO!NO!NO!NO!NO!NO! at my boss because nothing on the morning meeting agenda has anything to do with Daniel Bryan. Be a Daniel Bryan fan and when Daniel Bryan is involved in the segment, cheer for him or boo at him as much as you want...but when Daniel Bryan's segment is over, just drop it and focus on who IS in the segment. I mean, do you guys want Daniel Bryan to be on RAW for the entire 3 hours tonight? Will there be OUTRAGE if 15 minutes goes by and Daniel Bryan is not seen, heard from, or mentioned? This whole thing is really crazy. I couldn't agree more. If Daniel Bryan is going to ruin the rest of the product, I'd rather he leave. Why should he leave over something he has no control over? He's in high demand and the WWE is ruining their own product by limiting him. "Daniel Bryan chants are ruining other segments" Well, if the WWE used their most over guy more effectively, the crowd wouldn't be constantly demanding for him.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:48:04 GMT -5
I couldn't agree more. If Daniel Bryan is going to ruin the rest of the product, I'd rather he leave. Why should he leave over something he has no control over? He's in high demand and the WWE is ruining their own product by limiting him. "Daniel Bryan chants are ruining other segments" Well, if the WWE used their most over guy more effectively, the crowd wouldn't be constantly demanding for him. Because giving him the title twice and him having a match on every major card is limiting him. OK.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 28, 2014 12:55:55 GMT -5
Why should he leave over something he has no control over? He's in high demand and the WWE is ruining their own product by limiting him. "Daniel Bryan chants are ruining other segments" Well, if the WWE used their most over guy more effectively, the crowd wouldn't be constantly demanding for him. Because giving him the title twice and him having a match on every major card is limiting him. OK. You'll get no argument from me about Bryan being featured prominently, but those title reigns were a joke. Quite frankly, it's a shame they even count. And the "ruining segments" thing, to me, is ridiculous. They're not chanting for him the entire show, they're chanting for him during segments revolving around the Championship, a story he should undoubtedly be involved in. The crowd doesn't want to see Orton/Batista, and they're making damn sure WWE knows it. They brought Batista in to be this mega babyface and it backfired. He's naturally unlikeable. He's old. He's blown up, and people know it. He comes off as completely disingenuous. What's to like? He'd make a great heel, but convincing the crowd to cheer for that guy is going to be a major uphill battle.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 12:58:51 GMT -5
I honestly don't see a damn thing changing from the rumored Mania card from last week. I think they'll put Taker vs Brock on last just so the crowd doesn't get too pissed, but the card will probably stay the same. For some reason I just see them sticking to their guns on this one.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Oct 8, 2024 17:20:48 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2014 14:01:31 GMT -5
Batista = the HS star QB with the scholarship to that amazing University that the parents think is better for her ...but is actually just a roided out ugly douchebag with the intelligence of a flea That's offensive to fleas, dude.
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jan 28, 2014 14:13:48 GMT -5
Lets say hypothetically this is true...The first thing you need to learn is that if you build up something for too long it eventually gets to the point of a "we dont give a anymore". Take the Sting-Hogan angle from 1997. It was built up for over a year and when it finally came about, people really didnt care. Once we knew Sting was "pro WCW" the angle lost all momentum and then the match was God awful. WWE is dangerously pushing the envelope of "we dont care" any more. If the angle doesnt come to a head by Elimination Chamber or Wrestlemania, its going to be a train wreck.
|
|
|
Post by Next Manufactured’s Sweater on Jan 28, 2014 16:01:10 GMT -5
WWE is trolling the IWC...so hard! I love it more and more. 'The IWC.' Yup, because those weren't actual people at the Rumble, it was only people online who had an emotional reaction. the whole 'IWC' concept. It's so dead and gone that it's not even funny. What does it even mean these days? When WWE spends a majority of their show promoting an app and other means of social media, which a very large portion of its audience is a part of, then where does that line even exist anymore? The "IWC" mindset isn't really a distinction of Internet vs non-Internet anymore. "IWC" is essentially just shorthand for the community of fans that hate anyone with muscles and want WWE to only push the little "workrate" guys.
|
|
Road Warriors
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
"When we get done with you, we're going after family members boys!"
Joined on: Aug 15, 2006 15:16:34 GMT -5
Posts: 1,622
|
Post by Road Warriors on Jan 28, 2014 16:03:37 GMT -5
'The IWC.' Yup, because those weren't actual people at the Rumble, it was only people online who had an emotional reaction. the whole 'IWC' concept. It's so dead and gone that it's not even funny. What does it even mean these days? When WWE spends a majority of their show promoting an app and other means of social media, which a very large portion of its audience is a part of, then where does that line even exist anymore? The "IWC" mindset isn't really a distinction of Internet vs non-Internet anymore. "IWC" is essentially just shorthand for the community of fans that hate anyone with muscles and want WWE to only push the little "workrate" guys. I find nothing wrong with that and as you can see from my Avatar, I'm a big supporter of the muscle guys.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 28, 2014 16:37:05 GMT -5
'The IWC.' Yup, because those weren't actual people at the Rumble, it was only people online who had an emotional reaction. the whole 'IWC' concept. It's so dead and gone that it's not even funny. What does it even mean these days? When WWE spends a majority of their show promoting an app and other means of social media, which a very large portion of its audience is a part of, then where does that line even exist anymore? The "IWC" mindset isn't really a distinction of Internet vs non-Internet anymore. "IWC" is essentially just shorthand for the community of fans that hate anyone with muscles and want WWE to only push the little "workrate" guys. That statement seems incredibly short-sighted and narrowminded, albeit, a valiant attempt at attempting to exclude yourself from the label. For better or for worse, we're part of whatever label you want to slap on it these days, and there's growing discord among that group (because it's becoming exponentially larger.)
|
|